Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 690Qualcomm Adreno 710
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm5 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.10.2023 06.12.2018 30.11.2021
Power Consumption7 Watt
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.06787 -95%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.1025 -92%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.2337 -83%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.336
...
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.2337 -83%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 2393%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (10%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (5%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 13910     avg: 20912     median: 22262 (97%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 38076     avg: 43860     median: 44924 (99%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 11753     avg: 17481     median: 18522 (92%)     max: 20131 Points
min: 4356     avg: 4675     median: 4674.5 (23%)     max: 4993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 24304     avg: 30661     median: 32109 (96%)     max: 33376 Points
min: 4323     avg: 4889     median: 4889 (15%)     max: 5455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 16691     avg: 19247     median: 19545 (10%)     max: 20068 Points
min: 2311     avg: 2586     median: 2402 (1%)     max: 3046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4690     avg: 4989     median: 5124 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
3067 Points (4%)
min: 611     avg: 674     median: 623 (1%)     max: 788 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (3%)     max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 32     avg: 38.3     median: 38.5 (16%)     max: 42 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 5.1     median: 4.8 (2%)     max: 5.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 78.5     median: 83 (15%)     max: 96 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.7     median: 11.2 (2%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 193.6     median: 207 (15%)     max: 241 fps
min: 20     avg: 28.7     median: 31 (2%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 142.1     median: 156 (18%)     max: 162 fps
min: 23     avg: 25.3     median: 24 (3%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 240.3     median: 253 (5%)     max: 279 fps
min: 32     avg: 41     median: 45 (1%)     max: 46 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 316     median: 327 (19%)     max: 363 fps
min: 62     avg: 65     median: 64 (4%)     max: 69 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 189     avg: 491.3     median: 535 (4%)     max: 549 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
min: 105     avg: 110.7     median: 107 (1%)     max: 120 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 748439     median: 755643 (94%)     max: 784286 Points
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (9%)     max: 141881 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
212.3 fps (1%)
min: 38.5     avg: 40.3     median: 39.9 (0%)     max: 42.67 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (9%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 13998     median: 14138 (4%)     max: 14956 Points
min: 1323     avg: 1329     median: 1328.5 (0%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 16175     median: 16313 (5%)     max: 16867 Points
min: 1637     avg: 1646     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1654 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
20418 Points (20%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
27419 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.24     avg: 10     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 15.2 Watt
min: 3.43     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 4.94 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 60% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 12% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.8 ~ 60 fps
50%
Adreno 710:
30  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 710:
30  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 710:
47 49 59 ~ 52 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
55%
Adreno 710:
30 31 39 ~ 33 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4 60 89 90 90 ~ 78 fps
68%
Adreno 710:
39 60 60 ~ 53 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59 59.3 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
72%
Adreno 710:
30 40 60 ~ 43 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.9 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 710:
40  fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
60 103 ~ 82 fps
73%
Adreno 710:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 70%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 74%

Qualcomm Adreno 690lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







Qualcomm Adreno 750lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact60
PUBG Mobile78606040
Dead Trigger 282
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


1

1
2

1
1






Qualcomm Adreno 710lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact5233
PUBG Mobile534340
Dead Trigger 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3





1
1

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.27
log 16. 01:44:16

#0 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.143s ... 0.144s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.144s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.144s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0.049s ... 0.194s

#9 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.037s ... 0.23s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.032s ... 0.263s

#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.014s ... 0.277s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0.002s ... 0.279s

#13 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.018s ... 0.297s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.297s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.2s ... 0.497s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.497s

#17 Got 84 rows for game benchmarks. +0.054s ... 0.551s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.551s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.558s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.025s ... 0.583s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.583s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.585s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)