Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 04.12.2019
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Core Speed250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 - ? MHz587 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (30%)
min: 7970     avg: 9580     median: 9721 (52%)     max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (20%)
min: 11617     avg: 13082     median: 12873 (30%)     max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (28%)
min: 6960     avg: 8109     median: 8089 (50%)     max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (24%)
min: 8633     avg: 9759     median: 9516 (37%)     max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
90 fps (3%)
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 50     avg: 87.5     median: 90 (3%)     max: 142 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168     avg: 210.2     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
79 fps (22%)
min: 50     avg: 77.1     median: 68 (19%)     max: 117 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (7%)
min: 96     avg: 125.3     median: 125 (10%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
26 fps (16%)
min: 18     avg: 28.3     median: 30 (18%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (6%)
min: 18     avg: 21.2     median: 21 (7%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
42 fps (18%)
min: 27     avg: 44.1     median: 46.5 (20%)     max: 57 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (7%)
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (7%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
35 fps (1%)
min: 24     avg: 40.9     median: 44 (1%)     max: 54 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (0%)
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51.5 (0%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
10 fps (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (2%)
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (3%)     max: 78.57 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
54110 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42627 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18     avg: 8.3     median: 7.6 (8%)     max: 12.7 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 134% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
high
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
240%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 72 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
102%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
97%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
87%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 52 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 642:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
75%
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
68%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 110%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 88%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 29. 20:48:04

#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:16:31 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.078s ... 0.079s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.079s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.079s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.024s ... 0.103s

#8 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.006s ... 0.109s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.001s ... 0.11s

#10 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.323s ... 0.433s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.433s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.094s ... 0.527s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.527s

#14 Got 159 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.558s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.558s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.563s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.586s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.586s

#19 return log +0.047s ... 0.633s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)