Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 508 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 508 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 508 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs".
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 Qualcomm Adreno 508 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Adreno 600 Series Shared Memory yes yes yes API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 5 nm 14 nm 4 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 07.05.2021 08.05.2017 07.05.2021 Architecture Adreno 500 Core Speed 650 MHz Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 16508 avg: 18279 median: 18469 (2%) max: 18635 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 1299 avg: 1379 median: 1391 (6%) max: 1415 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 1204 avg: 1302 median: 1318 (3%) max: 1332 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 872 avg: 904 median: 907 (5%) max: 919 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6158 median: 6262 (31%) max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 767 avg: 797 median: 801 (2%) max: 809 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7037 median: 7012.5 (21%) max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3140 (2%) max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
min: 825 avg: 833 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 1.7 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (0%) max: 1.9 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.7 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 4.9 avg: 5.3 median: 5.3 (0%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 46.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 5.3 avg: 5.5 median: 5.5 (1%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 5.2 avg: 9.4 median: 9.7 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 13 avg: 13.9 median: 14 (1%) max: 14 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508 min: 29 avg: 29.7 median: 30 (0%) max: 30 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 16% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 106% n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
223%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
68%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
67%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 508:
30 31 31 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
18 fps, max:
32 fps
31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
31 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
Adreno 508:
29 30 55 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.12.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 38 fps
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
50%
Adreno 508:
29 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
47%
Adreno 508:
25 28 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
15 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 28 fps
Adreno 508:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 46% Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 114% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 114%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 08:53:58
#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8112 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.104s ... 0.105s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.105s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.105s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.034s ... 0.139s
#9 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.006s ... 0.145s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8112 +0.002s ... 0.147s
#11 got single benchmarks 8112 +0.021s ... 0.168s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.17s
#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.014s ... 0.185s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.185s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.155s ... 0.34s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.34s
#17 Got 63 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.356s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.356s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.361s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.027s ... 0.388s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.388s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.39s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)