Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 643
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC . The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650 , its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.
The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).
Qualcomm Adreno 643 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 643 is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) that is used in the Qualcomm QCM6490 and QCS6490. The SoC is not only intended for use in Android-based smartphones and tablets, but also for IoT products with Linux, Ubuntu or Windows 11 IoT Enterprise. In the QCM6490 and QCS6490 the 643 clocks at 812 MHz.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 660 Qualcomm Adreno 643 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Vulkan 1.x technology 14 nm 7 nm 6 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 02.12.2020 12.08.2021 Core Speed 812 MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
200519 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
6499 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
7131 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
3135 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
887 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
8.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
49 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
69 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 643
159 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
192996 Points (24%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
51.8 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
2937 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
3054 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
53822 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
42266 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
5.9 Watt (2%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=12 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 835% n=12 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 522% n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 643:
58 [X] Fairphone 5 4.2.1_18831865_18963989
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
35 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 643:
40 [X] Fairphone 5 4.2.1_18831865_18963989
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
27 fps, max:
58 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 643:
38 [X] Fairphone 5 4.2.1_18831865_18963989
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
240%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
150%
Adreno 643:
60 [X] Fairphone 5 2.9.0
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 643:
40 [X] Fairphone 5 2.9.0
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
32 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
180%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
133%
Adreno 643:
40 [X] Fairphone 5 2.9.0
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 643:
60 [X] Fairphone 5 1.10.0
Qualcomm QCM6490 2GHz
Adreno 643
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
261%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 227% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 211%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 128% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 128%
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 643 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Genshin Impact 58 40 38 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 2 1 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 06. 04:37:27
#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11804 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.177s ... 0.178s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.178s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.178s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.042s ... 0.22s
#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.022s ... 0.242s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.002s ... 0.244s
#11 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.091s ... 0.336s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11804 +0.002s ... 0.338s
#13 got single benchmarks 11804 +0.009s ... 0.347s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.347s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.18s ... 0.526s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.526s
#17 Got 126 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.555s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.555s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.559s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.58s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.58s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.582s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)