Qualcomm Adreno 540 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612
Qualcomm Adreno 540 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 540 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC for smartphones. It was introduced in early 2017 and can be found in high-end Android smartphones.
The integrated GPU is based on the optimized architecture of the Adreno 530 , but features clearly improved clock speeds (710 versus 624 MHz according to Anandtech ) and better thermal stability. This is also thanks to the new 10 nm process the Snapdragon 835 is produced in. In the reference smartphone from Qualcomm, the Adreno 540 is able to beat or perform at a similar level as the fastest smartphone graphics cards on the market (e.g. the ARM Mali-T880MP12 , ARM Mali-G71MP8 or Apple A10 GPU ). Therefore, it should be perfectly suited for demanding 3D gaming and also mobile VR and 4K displays.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 540 Qualcomm Adreno 685 Qualcomm Adreno 612 Adreno 600 Series Core Speed 710 MHz Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 10 nm 7 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 22.03.2017 06.12.2018 15.12.2015 Power Consumption 7 Watt Architecture Adreno 600
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 540
0.2 pt (1%)
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 16794 avg: 53776 median: 56046.5 (6%) max: 58360 Points
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
17290 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2359 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
4259 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 451 avg: 452 median: 452 (1%) max: 453 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 508 avg: 513 median: 513 (1%) max: 518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
17180 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3586 avg: 4690 median: 4956 (22%) max: 5269 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3682 avg: 5894 median: 6245.5 (14%) max: 6475 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2866 avg: 3801 median: 3840 (19%) max: 4101 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3324 avg: 4231 median: 4347 (13%) max: 4490 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 826 avg: 831 median: 831 (1%) max: 836 Points
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 786 avg: 791 median: 791 (1%) max: 796 Points
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.3 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (2%) max: 9.9 fps
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 25 avg: 25.6 median: 26 (2%) max: 26 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 22 avg: 24.5 median: 24 (3%) max: 26 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 21 avg: 37.9 median: 40 (1%) max: 43 fps
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 43 avg: 55.2 median: 54 (3%) max: 64 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 540 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 69 avg: 107 median: 111.5 (1%) max: 119 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 38752 avg: 38763 median: 38762.5 (88%) max: 38773 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
44696 Points (99%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8356 Points (8%)
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3409 Points (6%)
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 540 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 105% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 38% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.21.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
53 fps, max:
60 fps
62 ~ 61 fps
100%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.21.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 61 fps
100%
Adreno 540:
30 60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.9.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 45 fps
100%
Adreno 540:
60 60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.9.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
78%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
100%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Sony Xperia XZ1 5.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 540 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 89% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 101%
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 04. 12:48:22
#0 checking url part for id 7714 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7714 +0.055s ... 0.189s
#9 got single benchmarks 7714 +0.044s ... 0.232s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.002s ... 0.234s
#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.006s ... 0.24s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.002s ... 0.242s
#13 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.023s ... 0.265s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.265s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.142s ... 0.407s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.407s
#17 Got 64 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.422s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.422s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.428s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.03s ... 0.457s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.457s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.46s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)