Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A12-9700P vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It combines four Zen cores (4 threads as no SMT/HyperThreading support) clocked at 3.5 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD A12-9700PAMD Ryzen 3 2200G
CodenameBristol RidgeZen
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3400 MHz3500 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt65 Watt
Transistors3100 Million4500 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketFP4AM4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 2200G
25.4 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
363 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1446 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
min: 561     avg: 574     median: 577 (4%)     max: 581 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (22%)     max: 80 Points
min: 142     avg: 145.8     median: 145.6 (40%)     max: 150 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
6.7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.94 Points
1.7 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
4625 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
16684 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
333 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1462 Points (2%)
3229 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
14790 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3948 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.7 fps (0%)
39.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
84.6 fps (2%)
184 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.3 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 825     avg: 826     median: 826 (6%)     max: 827 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
6636 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.2 s (4%)
11.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
42.1 s (2%)
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
980 s (4%)
651 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
7608 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (6%)     max: 2530 Points
min: 6549     avg: 6805     median: 6805 (17%)     max: 7061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27373 Points (22%)
71141 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
5655 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
7706 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 950     avg: 1087     median: 1086.5 (41%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3391     avg: 4882     median: 4881.5 (9%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
959 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3431 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4148     avg: 4249     median: 4249 (42%)     max: 4350 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11266     avg: 11897     median: 11896.5 (12%)     max: 12527 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2158 Points (24%)
4082 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4899 Points (6%)
11105 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (27%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2308 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2059 ms (2%)
min: 954     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
164.9 ms (2%)
92.7 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19404 Points (14%)
34670 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
95.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)
69 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200G → 207% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 16:51:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9896 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759157474s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9896 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 9896 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.054s

#13 return log +0.006s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)