Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5-7Y57

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

Intel Core i5-7Y57

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7Y57

The Intel Core i5-7Y57 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the Q1/2017. It is a slightly faster version of the Core i5-7Y54 (1.2-3.2 GHz). The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.2-3.3 GHz (2-core Turbo 2.9 GHz). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Despite the changed designation, the Core i5-7Y57 is the successor to the Core m5-6Y57 (Skylake Y-series), so the chip does not reach the performance level of other Core i processors due to the lower TDP. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y57 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelAMD A10-9600PIntel Core i5-7Y57
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 « 1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz1200 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt4.5 Watt
Transistors3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache4 MB
SocketBGA
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (1%)     max: 217 Points
273 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (23%)     max: 77 Points
133 Points (40%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.6 Points
3 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
1.5 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (15%)     max: 2520 Points
5132 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (5%)     max: 6939 Points
9888 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
12373 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6550 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
534 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.3 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
1054 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
32.2 s (17%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1526 Points (2%)
2105 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.3 fps (6%)
17.2 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
85.4 fps (20%)
106.9 fps (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.5 GB/s (4%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
3698 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.7 s (4%)
11.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
26.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
942 s (4%)
639 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (7%)     max: 7916 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
3579 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (19%)     max: 24803 Points
35764 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
34008 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
min: 39302     avg: 39329     median: 39329 (33%)     max: 39356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
2980 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (5%)     max: 3229 Points
4170 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1045 Points (4%)
1448 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
4073 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
7480 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2047 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4711 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
6405 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
3271 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5702 Points (9%)
6699 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2237 Points (33%)
3377 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
min: 1163     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (1%)     max: 1189 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
268.1 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (18%)     max: 19791 Points
min: 29367     avg: 30851     median: 30850.5 (28%)     max: 32334 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
180866 Points (62%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
146457 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6046 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
15296 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
10309 Points (67%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7Y57 → 132% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 14:50:21

#0 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9230 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:38:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.022s ... 0.061s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9230 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#9 got single benchmarks 9230 +0.009s ... 0.072s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.216s ... 0.288s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.311s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)