Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-660LM vs Intel Core i7-1265U vs Intel Core i7-640LM

Intel Core i7-660LM

► remove from comparison Intel 660LM

The Intel Core i7-660LM is a fast middle class low voltage dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.27 to 3.07 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline).  All features (like Virtualization VT-x and VT-d, Trusted Execution) of the Arrandale core are activated in the 660LM. Compared to the Core i7-620M, the 660LM is slower but more power efficient.

A feature of the new Core i7-660LM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i7-660LM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. The performance should be somewhere on the level of the Core i3-380M and i5-450M. Beware, that some designs may not feature the Turbo Boost or due to small cooling solutions, the TurboBoost may not trigger very often. Therefore, the performance could be worse.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Modern applications that support AES encoding can profit significantly using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 266-566 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be a lot faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 25 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 25 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo P-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i7-1265U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1265U

The Intel Core i7-1265U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.8 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.3 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The 1265U offers "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the 10 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older quad-core Tiger Lake CPUs with 15 Watt (like the Intel Core i7-1160G7). The sustained performance will be limited by the TDP setting and thermals and therefore only short term loads. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the big Golden Cove cores, the single thread performance should be better than similar clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

Intel Core i7-640LM

► remove from comparison Intel 640LM

The Intel Core i7-640LM is a fast middle class low voltage dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.16 to 2.93 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i7-620M, the 640LM is slower but more power efficient.

A feature of the new Core i7-640LM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-640LM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. The performance should be somewhere on the level of the Core i5-430M. Beware, that some designs may not feature the Turbo Boost or due to small cooling solutions, the TurboBoost may not trigger very often. Therefore, the performance could be worse.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Modern applications that support AES encoding can profit significantly using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 266-566 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be a lot faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 25 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 25 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo P-series (CPU alone).

ModelIntel Core i7-660LMIntel Core i7-1265UIntel Core i7-640LM
CodenameArrandaleAlder Lake-UArrandale
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-MIntel Core i7
Series: Core i7 Arrandale
Intel Core i7-640M2.8 - 3.46 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620M2.66 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660LM « 2.27 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640LM2.13 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620LM2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-680UM1.47 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660UM1.33 - 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640UM1.2 - 2.27 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620UM1.06 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85050.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85000.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73050.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73000.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640M2.8 - 3.46 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620M2.66 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660LM2.27 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640LM « 2.13 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620LM2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-680UM1.47 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660UM1.33 - 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640UM1.2 - 2.27 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620UM1.06 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2267 - 3067 MHz1300 - 4800 MHz2130 - 2933 MHz
FSB25002500
L2 Cache512 KB9.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 410 / 122 / 4
TDP25 Watt15 Watt25 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm10 nm32 nm
Die Size81+177 mm281+177 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1288BGA1744BGA1288
FeaturesTurbo Boost (2.93 GHz max), Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrated GMA HD 266-566MHzDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHATurbo Boost (2.93 GHz max), Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrated GMA HD 266-566MHz
Architecturex86x86x86
$346 U.S.$332 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache928 KB
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1265U
34.9 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4332     avg: 7486     median: 8225 (8%)     max: 9219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1144     avg: 1595     median: 1679.5 (71%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 528     avg: 619     median: 642 (70%)     max: 701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1669     avg: 2884     median: 3214.5 (8%)     max: 3584 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 706     avg: 1244     median: 1344.5 (8%)     max: 1572 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 165.3     avg: 229.7     median: 240 (66%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.5 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8549 Points (52%)
36%
1 640LM +
min: 2980     avg: 3054     median: 3053.5 (18%)     max: 3127 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38152 Points (28%)
16%
1 640LM +
min: 5869     avg: 5956     median: 5956 (4%)     max: 6043 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60266 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13904 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
217.4 s (3%)
21%
1 640LM +
min: 668     avg: 1037     median: 1036.5 (12%)     max: 1405 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.2 s (1%)
24%
1 640LM +
min: 20.96     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (4%)     max: 21.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5960 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 20087     avg: 32344     median: 34399 (20%)     max: 38715 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4614     avg: 5198     median: 5285.5 (62%)     max: 5617 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
265.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.09     avg: 8.6     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (27%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.7 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 684     avg: 887     median: 834 (11%)     max: 1326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 364     avg: 465.9     median: 423.5 (3%)     max: 684 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4666     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.578 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7351     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (20%)     max: 11516 Points
27%
1 640LM +
min: 2496     avg: 2539     median: 2539 (5%)     max: 2582 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
55%
1 640LM +
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (3%)     max: 15 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.8 s (2%)
49%
1 640LM +
min: 869     avg: 878     median: 877.5 (4%)     max: 886 s
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 640LM +
5734 Points (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 640LM +
min: 6.4     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (83%)     max: 6.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26635     avg: 35503     median: 35502.5 (27%)     max: 44370 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7560     avg: 11888     median: 11716 (29%)     max: 16290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63003 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63619 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67580 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5667     avg: 9450     median: 10255 (26%)     max: 12375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8745     avg: 14302     median: 14659 (26%)     max: 18414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3482     avg: 5221     median: 5352.5 (23%)     max: 6837 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2376 Points (57%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7304 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1789 Points (57%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
7851 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1429     avg: 1697     median: 1739.5 (66%)     max: 1806 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5022     avg: 7709     median: 8127 (15%)     max: 8981 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1489     avg: 1648     median: 1678 (7%)     max: 1700 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6992     avg: 8211     median: 8305.5 (26%)     max: 8917 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7515 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33057 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 542     avg: 572     median: 553 (1%)     max: 636 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 68050     avg: 75259     median: 73251 (54%)     max: 84477 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 198.4     avg: 233.9     median: 242.5 (67%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 221     avg: 268.4     median: 279.5 (50%)     max: 288 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1301     avg: 1540     median: 1593.5 (60%)     max: 1623 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.8     avg: 41.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 63 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.2     avg: 48.6     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 72.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.54     avg: 6.8     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.67     avg: 5     median: 4.6 (6%)     max: 6.61 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18.3     avg: 25.8     median: 26.1 (19%)     max: 30.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1265U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-640LM → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 07. 20:23:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1277 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14072 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 558 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759861396s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1277 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 1277 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14072 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 14072 +0.013s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 558 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#13 got single benchmarks 558 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.064s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)