Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-6006U vs AMD A12-9720P

Intel Core i3-6006U

► remove from comparison Intel 6006U

The Intel Core i3-6006U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core SoC based on the Skylake architecture and has been launched in November 2016. The CPU can be found in small and light notebooks. In addition to two CPU cores with Hyper-Threading clocked at (rather low) 2 GHz (no Turbo Boost), the chip also integrates an HD Graphics 520 GPU (clocked at only 900 MHz) and a dual-channel DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory controller. The SoC is manufactured using a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Skylake replaces both Haswell and Broadwell and brings the same microarchitecture in every TDP class from 4.5 to 45 W. The extensive improvements of the Skylake design include increased out-of-order buffers, optimized prefetching and branch prediction as well as additional performance gains through Hyper-Threading. Overall, however, performance per clock has been increased by only 5 to 10 percent (compared to Haswell) respectively under 5 percent (compard to Broadwell), which is quite modest for a new architecture ("Tock").

Performance

According to the specified clock rates and the improved architecture, the Core i3-6100U should perform slightly above the similar clocked Core i5-5005U of the Broadwell architecture. Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as more demanding applications and light multitasking.

Graphics

The integrated graphics unit called HD Graphics 520 represents the "GT2" version of the Skylake GPU (Intel Gen. 9). The 24 Execution Units, also called EUs, are clocked at 300 - 900 MHz and offer a performance somewhere in range of a dedicated GeForce 820M. Games of 2015 can thus be played smoothly in low settings. For more information about performance and features, check our page for the HD Graphics 520. Clocked at 900 MHz, the i3-6006U features currently the slowest variant of the HD Graphics 520 (clocks up to 1050 MHz in the Core i7 models).

Power Consumption

Specified at a TDP of 15 W (including CPU, GPU and memory controller), the CPU is best suited for small notebooks and ultrabooks (11-inches and above). Optionally, the TDP can be lowered to 7.5 watts (cTDP down), reducing both heat dissipation and performance and allowing even more compact designs.

AMD A12-9720P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9720P

The AMD A12-9720P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was introduced in 2017. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts, not verified) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.7 - 3.8 GHz (4.05 GHz for single core were briefly achievable in our test sample), a Radeon R7 iGPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average A12-9720P in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-4210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, making the former a fairly slow chip that's suitable for basic day-to-day activities only as of late 2022.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAM, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9720P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelIntel Core i3-6006UAMD A12-9720P
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameSkylakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i3-6167U compare2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6100H compare2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6157U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6100U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6006U « 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2000 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
Die Size99 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGAFP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 520 (300 - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors3100 Million

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 212.5     median: 214.5 (1%)     max: 218 Points
min: 229     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (1%)     max: 240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 69     avg: 80     median: 83.5 (25%)     max: 84 Points
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (22%)     max: 76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.4 Points (3%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
min: 0.93     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (23%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3203     avg: 3222     median: 3227 (19%)     max: 3236 Points
min: 2640     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (17%)     max: 2846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 7293     avg: 7348     median: 7364 (5%)     max: 7388 Points
min: 7200     avg: 7361     median: 7361 (5%)     max: 7522 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
768 s (9%)
415.5 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.3 s (5%)
13 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 6006U +
1808 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 6006U +
14.1 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 6006U +
74.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (3%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.8 s (4%)
min: 17.77     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (4%)     max: 21.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
42.3 s (2%)
min: 39.77     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (2%)     max: 48.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
952 s (4%)
min: 864     avg: 902     median: 901.5 (4%)     max: 939 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2837     avg: 2920     median: 2903.5 (8%)     max: 3034 Points
2761 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
25648 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
24747 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27981 Points (24%)
min: 24457     avg: 27079     median: 27079 (23%)     max: 29701 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2258 Points (6%)
min: 2258     avg: 2330     median: 2329.5 (6%)     max: 2401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
3220 Points (6%)
min: 3179     avg: 3265     median: 3264.5 (6%)     max: 3350 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 2575     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (26%)     max: 2639 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 4975     avg: 5042     median: 5042 (6%)     max: 5109 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 2468     avg: 2526     median: 2516 (34%)     max: 2593 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 4723     avg: 4814     median: 4805 (12%)     max: 4914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 4265     avg: 4355     median: 4384 (8%)     max: 4415 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6006U +
min: 1943     avg: 1991     median: 2012 (39%)     max: 2018 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6006U +
4435 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6006U +
2054 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 6006U +
4835 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 6006U +
4572 Points (41%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 6006U +
4402 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 6006U +
4464 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 6006U +
4501 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1734     avg: 1758     median: 1744 (2%)     max: 1797 ms
2422 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 135.3     avg: 239.6     median: 147.4 (2%)     max: 436 ms
min: 146.6     avg: 192.1     median: 192.1 (2%)     max: 237.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18570     avg: 19275     median: 19174 (17%)     max: 20082 Points
min: 14783     avg: 16961     median: 16960.5 (15%)     max: 19138 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-6006U → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9720P → 109% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 11:33:22

#0 checking url part for id 8373 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9192 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8373 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 8373 +0.048s ... 0.086s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9192 +0.003s ... 0.088s

#9 got single benchmarks 9192 +0.013s ... 0.101s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.178s ... 0.279s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.301s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)