, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i5-2450M vs Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-2450M

► remove from comparison Intel 2450M

The Intel Core i5-2450M is a fast dual core processor that first appeared in Dell laptops in 11/2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.5 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.8 GHz (2 cores active) and 3.1 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2450M does not support VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. However, the integrated gpu offers a higher Turbo Boost clock rate.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo Boost 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2450M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2435M it is clocked with  650 or 1300MHz (with Turbo Boost).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2450M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. Looking at benchmarks of slower clocked Core i5 CPUs, the i5-2450M should position itself slightly above the old Core i5-620M and is therefore suited even for demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i5-2410M

► remove from comparison Intel 2410M

The Intel Core i5-2410M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q1 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.3 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.6 GHz (2 cores active) and 2.9 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2410M does not support AES, VT-d, and Trusted Execution functions.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2410M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2410M it is clocked from  650-1200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2410M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2410M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i5-2450MIntel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Core i5 Sandy Bridge
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-2450M2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2410M2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2467M compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2450M2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-2410M2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2467M compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
2500 - 3100 MHz2300 - 2900 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
35 35
624 624
32 32
149 mm2149 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PPGA988rPGA988B / BGA1023
HD Graphics 3000, DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 3000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 16GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1300 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$225 U.S.
Intel Core i5 2450MIntel Core i5 2410M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (5%)     max: 2.8 Points
min: 2.19     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (5%)     max: 2.61 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2450M +
min: 1.19     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (38%)     max: 1.2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3830     avg: 3912     median: 3918.5 (35%)     max: 3989
min: 3066     avg: 3642     median: 3663 (33%)     max: 3733
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8273     avg: 8507     median: 8542 (14%)     max: 8619
min: 6005     avg: 7880     median: 7962.5 (13%)     max: 8116
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 9868     avg: 10292     median: 10318.5 (10%)     max: 10518 Points
min: 7559     avg: 9451     median: 9618 (9%)     max: 9840 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 4664     avg: 4835     median: 4847 (34%)     max: 4922 Points
min: 3093     avg: 4482     median: 4545 (32%)     max: 4670 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 546.9     avg: 604     median: 606.5 (7%)     max: 655.278 s
min: 584.1     avg: 627     median: 591.4 (7%)     max: 838.391 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 17.7     avg: 18.9     median: 19 (4%)     max: 19.461 s
min: 18.3     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (4%)     max: 26.301 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 2529     avg: 2849     median: 2848.5 (18%)     max: 3168
2382 (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 14.01     avg: 14.6     median: 14.6 (7%)     max: 15.2 fps
14.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 76.6     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (23%)     max: 80.66 fps
76.3 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (5%)     max: 0.133 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.192     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.235 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (5%)
1.3 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2830     avg: 3384     median: 3441.5 (19%)     max: 3475 Points
min: 2702     avg: 3198     median: 3219 (18%)     max: 3271 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12.963     avg: 13     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.2 s
min: 12     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (3%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 29     avg: 29.6     median: 29.7 (1%)     max: 30.382 s
min: 30     avg: 32.3     median: 32 (1%)     max: 47 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 671     avg: 689     median: 687.2 (3%)     max: 706.899 s
min: 717.1     avg: 760     median: 743.7 (3%)     max: 1298 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 49000     avg: 53208     median: 52850 (25%)     max: 58130 MIPS
53120 MIPS (25%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 34340     avg: 34720     median: 34490 (26%)     max: 35560 MFLOPS
32000 MFLOPS (25%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 2410M +
min: 7191     avg: 7287     median: 7287 (46%)     max: 7383 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 7     avg: 7     median: 7 (90%)     max: 7.1 Points
min: 3.4     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 9078     avg: 9278     median: 9300 (11%)     max: 9384 Points
min: 5000     avg: 8505     median: 8680 (10%)     max: 8974 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2948     avg: 3530     median: 3521 (13%)     max: 3886 Points
min: 1501     avg: 3173     median: 3211 (12%)     max: 3657 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2450M → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2410M → 95% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 23:02:11

#0 checking url part for id 3001 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1572 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3001 +0s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 3001 +0.035s ... 0.047s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1572 +0.001s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 1572 +0.125s ... 0.173s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.173s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.203s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.206s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)