Intel Core i5-2410M vs Intel Core i5-2467M

Intel Core i5-2410M

► remove Intel 2410M

The Intel Core i5-2410M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q1 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.3 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.6 GHz (2 cores active) and 2.9 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2410M does not support AES, VT-d, and Trusted Execution functions.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2410M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2410M it is clocked from  650-1200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2410M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2410M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i5-2467M

► remove Intel 2467M

The Intel Core i5-2467M is power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processor for thin and light laptops. The base frequency of 1.6 GHz is relatively low, but due to Turbo Boost 2.0, the CPU may clock up to 2.3 GHz (one core loaded, 2GHz with both cores loaded). However, this is depending on the cooling and power consumption of the laptop. Due to HyperThreading, the i5-2467M is able to handle 4 threads in parallel. Compared to the slightly slower i5-2537M, the 2467 offers a faster base speed (1.6 vs 1.4GHz).

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. The 2467M offers not all features of the Sandy Bridge core, e.g. VPro, VT-d or Trusted Execution are not enabled.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 clocked at 350 or 1150MHz (Turbo Boost). Due to the slower clock rate, compared to other HD Graphics 3000 (usually 650-1100/1300MHz in non LV processors), the performance should be noticeable lower.

The performance of the CPU should be a bit higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. Therefore, the performance should be similar to a Core i7-680UM / Core i3-330M.

The TDP of 17W (includes the integrated GPU and memory controller) allows the use of the 2467M CPU in small subnotebooks.

Intel Core i5-2410MIntel Core i5-2467M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Core i5 Sandy Bridge
Intel Core i5-2540M (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2520M (compare)2500 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2450M (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2435M (compare)2400 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2430M (compare)2400 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2415M (compare)2300 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-2410M2300 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2557M (compare)1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2467M1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2537M (compare)1400 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2540M (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2520M (compare)2500 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2450M (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2435M (compare)2400 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2430M (compare)2400 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2415M (compare)2300 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2410M2300 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2557M (compare)1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-2467M1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-2537M (compare)1400 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
2300 - 2900 MHz1600 - 2300 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
35 17
624 624
32 32
149 mm2149 mm2
100 °C100 °C
rPGA988B / BGA1023BGA1023
HD Graphics 3000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 16GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 3000 (350-1150MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Intel Core i5 2410MIntel Core i5 2467M
$250 U.S.

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
2.6 Points (6%)
1.8 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 3066     avg: 3642.3     median: 3663 (40%)     max: 3733 Points
min: 2776     avg: 2855.1     median: 2848 (31%)     max: 2922 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 6005     avg: 7879.9     median: 7962 (12%)     max: 8116 Points
min: 4707     avg: 5736.8     median: 5921 (9%)     max: 5970 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 7559     avg: 9451.4     median: 9618 (13%)     max: 9840 Points
min: 6138     avg: 6961     median: 7074 (9%)     max: 7306 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 3093     avg: 4481.7     median: 4545 (44%)     max: 4670 Points
min: 3355     avg: 3534.8     median: 3548 (34%)     max: 3634 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 584     avg: 627.4     median: 591 (7%)     max: 838 seconds
min: 804     avg: 888.5     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1051 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 18     avg: 19.9     median: 19 (4%)     max: 26 seconds
min: 25     avg: 27     median: 27 (5%)     max: 27 seconds
WinRAR - Result
2382 KB/s (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
14.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
76.3 fps (28%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
1.3 GB/s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2702     avg: 3198.4     median: 3219 (22%)     max: 3271 Points
min: 1949     avg: 2315.7     median: 2414 (16%)     max: 2441 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (3%)     max: 25 Seconds
min: 17     avg: 18.3     median: 17 (4%)     max: 24 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 30     avg: 32.4     median: 32 (1%)     max: 47 Seconds
min: 38     avg: 41.3     median: 39 (2%)     max: 54 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 717     avg: 759.5     median: 743 (3%)     max: 1298 Seconds
min: 895     avg: 969.8     median: 934 (4%)     max: 1237 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
53120 MIPS (25%)
min: 27000     avg: 33362.5     median: 33725 (16%)     max: 39000 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
32000 MFLOPS (25%)
min: 18900     avg: 22582.5     median: 23650 (18%)     max: 24130 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 7191     avg: 7287     median: 7287 (46%)     max: 7383 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
min: 3     avg: 6.8     median: 6 (86%)     max: 6 points
6.3 points (90%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 5000     avg: 8505.3     median: 8680 (12%)     max: 8974 Points
min: 5115     avg: 6126.8     median: 6303 (9%)     max: 6549 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 1501     avg: 3173.3     median: 3211 (17%)     max: 3657 points
min: 2652     avg: 2666.5     median: 2666 (14%)     max: 2681 points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2410M → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2467M → 82%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)