NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000 for laptops is a professional high-end graphics card for big and powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU102 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 Ti . Compared to the desktop RTX 6000, the mobile variant offers lower clock speeds.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU102 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 6000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Due to the lower clock speeds, the mobile RTX 6000 lags slightly behind the desktop version with the same name. Nvidia states for example that a desktop system using the RTX 6000 is on average 13% faster in the SPECviewperf13 4k benchmark.
Due to the extremely high power consumption of 200 Watt (TDP), the mobile Quadro RTX 6000 needs an excellent cooling solution and will be used only in big laptops.
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The professional GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti . The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T2000 , the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro T2000 Mobile 1024 60 1575 1785 Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 40 1200 1620 Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 35 930 1500 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) 1024 75? 1530 1725 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 80 1455 1590 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 896 50 1395 1560
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.
The performance in professional apps should be clearly lower than a normal (Max-P) Quadro T2000 due to the lower clock speeds, but still ahead the slower Quadro T1000 due to the higher shader count. Compared to consumer cards, the mobile GTX 1650 should be still slower.
Thanks to the relative low power consumption of the Quadro T2000 Max-Q, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Quadro Turing Series Codename TU102 TU117 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q Architecture Turing Turing Turing Pipelines 4608 - unified 1024 - unified 1024 - unified Core Speed 1275 - 1455 (Boost) MHz 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 14000 MHz 12000 effective = 1500 MHz 8000 MHz Memory Bus Width 384 Bit 64 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 24 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 200 Watt 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) 35 - 40 Watt Transistors 18.6 Billion 4.7 Billion technology 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm Features NVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor Notebook Size large medium sized medium sized Date of Announcement 04.09.2019 27.05.2022 27.05.2019 Theoretical Performance 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s Information Optimus only Link to Manufacturer Page nvdam.widen.net
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
11084 Points (32%)
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 18% 22% 100%
min: 3348 avg: 3352 median: 3352 (10%) max: 3356 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 30% 18% 22% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 3066 avg: 3094 median: 3094 (8%) max: 3122 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 62% 73%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
75193 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (19%) max: 17829 Points
min: 21582 avg: 24992 median: 24991.5 (27%) max: 28401 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 70%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (9%) max: 33694 Points
min: 39803 avg: 41106 median: 41106 (11%) max: 42409 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 81%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 100%
min: 7320 avg: 7544 median: 7543.5 (13%) max: 7767 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 61% 69%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
min: 8107 avg: 8262 median: 8261.5 (9%) max: 8416 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 59% 68%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
min: 11695 avg: 11907 median: 11907 (17%) max: 12119 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 62% 75%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 11454 avg: 11461 median: 11461 (10%) max: 11468 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 65% 76%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
39269 Points (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 64%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 Points (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 67%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36376 Points (48%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 85%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 650%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 94 avg: 97.4 median: 97.4 (24%) max: 100.8 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 74.5 avg: 74.6 median: 74.6 (11%) max: 74.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 37.81 avg: 40.3 median: 40.3 (9%) max: 42.75 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 28.57 avg: 32.1 median: 32.1 (8%) max: 35.53 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 50.4 avg: 50.7 median: 50.7 (14%) max: 51 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 6.31 avg: 7.1 median: 7.1 (6%) max: 7.79 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 88.3 avg: 89 median: 89 (36%) max: 89.6 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 88.9 avg: 90.5 median: 90.5 (15%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 93.7 avg: 93.9 median: 93.9 (16%) max: 94 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
217 fps (58%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 44% 49% 100%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 97.2 avg: 100.6 median: 100.6 (27%) max: 103.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 46% 44% 49% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
217 fps (38%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 29% 31% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 88.9 avg: 91.1 median: 91.1 (16%) max: 93.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 200 W 42% 29% 31% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 139.4 avg: 141.6 median: 141.6 (16%) max: 143.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 69% 77%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 37.56 avg: 40 median: 40 (9%) max: 42.39 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 63% 70%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 41.71 avg: 44.9 median: 44.9 (9%) max: 48.02 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 79% 91%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 105.7 avg: 108 median: 108 (12%) max: 110.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 73% 81%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 14.87 avg: 15.3 median: 15.3 (5%) max: 15.66 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 78% 88%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 109.6 avg: 113.2 median: 113.2 (17%) max: 116.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 74% 80%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 134.6 avg: 139.3 median: 139.3 (15%) max: 143.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 76% 85%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (11%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (14%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (10%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (16%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (13%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5840 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
141.2 fps (49%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 216 avg: 220 median: 220 (13%) max: 224 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 85% 93%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
64.8 fps (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 29%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
133.4 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 33%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
150.8 fps (17%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 78%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
234.9 fps (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 73%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
255.2 fps (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 90%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
622 fps (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 72%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1640 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3050 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
6331 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 82%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
min: 76.7 avg: 83.3 median: 83.3 (18%) max: 89.9 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 111%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (44%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
min: 0.3604 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (40%) max: 0.4355 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 89% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
min: 34.7 avg: 36.9 median: 36.9 (59%) max: 39 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 93% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) → 100% n=3 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 31% n=3 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 40% n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
182 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
96 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
78 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
55 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
263.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
77.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47.6 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
35.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
147.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
85.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
58.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
141.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
50.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
44.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
53.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
179 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
94.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
77.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
51 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
123.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
56 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
35.8 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
27.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
120.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
40.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
28.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
148.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
60.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
36.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
24.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
27.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
12.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
9.8 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
271 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
86.1 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
69.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
40.3 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
83 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
58 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
55 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
50 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
41.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
31.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
24.6 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
144 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
86.4 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
72.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.9 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
71 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
53 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
45 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
25 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
101 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
56 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
48 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
42 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91.9 101 ~ 96 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
76 87 ~ 82 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
64.8 73 ~ 69 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
47.2 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
91 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
25.7 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
145 153 ~ 149 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
132 140 ~ 136 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
118 130 ~ 124 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
108 118 ~ 113 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
181 fps
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
107.6 fps
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
62.5 fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
79.5 fps
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2020 182 96 78 55 Gears Tactics 263.3 77.5 47.6 35.1 Doom Eternal 147.4 85.5 58.1 Hunt Showdown 141.3 50.3 44.5 Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 64.2 53.1 47 GRID 2019 179 94.7 77.7 51 Borderlands 3 123.4 56 35.8 27.3 Control 120.2 40.4 28.3 Total War: Three Kingdoms 148.4 60.3 36.3 24.4 Anno 1800 27.86 12.9 9.8 Dirt Rally 2.0 271 86.1 69.9 40.3 Far Cry New Dawn 83 58 55 50 Metro Exodus 91.5 41.74 31.2 24.6 Apex Legends 144 86.4 72.7 64.9 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 71 53 45 25 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101 56 48 42 X-Plane 11.11 96 82 69 47.2 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 91 45 33 25.7 13 Dota 2 Reborn 149 136 124 113 46 The Witcher 3 181 107.6 62.5 33 BioShock Infinite 79.5 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 6 12 1 8 10 1 2 11 6 1 4 8 3 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 23. 19:02:08
#0 checking url part for id 9923 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9886 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:38:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.129s ... 0.13s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.13s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.13s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9923 +0.037s ... 0.167s
#9 got single benchmarks 9923 +0.007s ... 0.174s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0.002s ... 0.176s
#11 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.016s ... 0.191s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9886 +0.002s ... 0.193s
#13 got single benchmarks 9886 +0.015s ... 0.208s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.208s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.324s ... 0.532s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.532s
#17 Got 184 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.56s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.56s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.018s ... 0.578s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.059s ... 0.637s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.637s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.64s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)