Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i5-13500T

Intel Core i7-9700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700K

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 4.9 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a fast and very economical desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.6 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model, and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited for small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-13500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 watts), the maximum possible energy requirement increases slightly.

ModelIntel Core i7-9700KIntel Core i5-13500T
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K « 3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE compare2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E compare3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E compare2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4900 MHz1600 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 814 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP95 Watt35 Watt
Technology14++ nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1700
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$385 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11028 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1754 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
475 Points (52%)
669 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3250 Points (8%)
4246 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1433     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (9%)     max: 1465 Points
1945 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 205.5     median: 205.5 (57%)     max: 208 Points
247 Points (68%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.8 Points (20%)
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (56%)
3.1 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7624     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (46%)     max: 7682 Points
8693 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42677     avg: 42778     median: 42777.5 (31%)     max: 42878 Points
40528 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
53600 Points (34%)
62808 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9774 Points (12%)
14147 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
120.5 s (1%)
133.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.5 s (1%)
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7396 Points (12%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
40034 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5840 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
94.8 fps (32%)
100.5 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
270 fps (62%)
259.5 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
13 fps (23%)
12.1 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (23%)
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.1 GB/s (21%)
8.2 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
533 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
307 Seconds (2%)
291 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12844     avg: 13016     median: 12928 (28%)     max: 13447 Points
12818 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
421.1 s (2%)
430.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 53605     avg: 54313     median: 54484 (42%)     max: 54680 Points
54029 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14489     avg: 15025     median: 14657 (36%)     max: 16091 Points
12162 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81711     avg: 82658     median: 82294 (67%)     max: 83908 Points
70975 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83615     avg: 83781     median: 83781 (68%)     max: 83947 Points
69547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81896     avg: 84164     median: 84164 (70%)     max: 86432 Points
77848 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12856     avg: 13012     median: 13018 (33%)     max: 13171 Points
13665 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18241     avg: 18437     median: 18332 (33%)     max: 18780 Points
18673 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7736     avg: 7954     median: 7875 (33%)     max: 8349 Points
6210 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2393 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
7327 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1300 Points (51%)
1716 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7440 Points (13%)
7377 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1685 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7316 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5925     avg: 5984     median: 5984 (60%)     max: 6043 Points
7069 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28792     avg: 29226     median: 29225.5 (29%)     max: 29659 Points
29164 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5744 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
26471 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
27774 Points (49%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4825 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
948 ms (1%)
562 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
41962 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
254 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1324 Points (50%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
222.4 Watt (38%)
55.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
202.6 Watt (37%)
79.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
7.1 Points per Watt (5%)
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700K → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 109% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 03:34:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11116 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754530474s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 06 Aug 2025 11:23:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11116 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 11116 +0.007s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.06s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)