Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Core i5-8400

Intel Core i7-8700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700K

The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8700K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier.

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8700K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i7-9700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700

The Intel Core i7-9700 is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3 - 4.7 GHz. Compared to the similar named Core i7-9700K, the 9700 has no open multiplicator for easy overclocking, offers lower clock speeds and offers a reduced TDP.

Compared to the old Core i7-8700, the 9700 offers two more real cores but no Hyperthreading. Therefore, the performance gain is not that big - depending on the app. The single core performance was slightly improved thanks to the higher Turbo clocks. As a high end desktop CPU, the i7-9700 is well suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 65 Watt (instead of the 95W of the faster models) and therefore the CPU wont need a high end desktop cooling system.

Intel Core i5-8400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8400

The Intel Core i5-8400 is a mid-range 6-core CPU. The processor belongs to the Coffee Lake generation and was presented in September 2017. It does not support Hyper-Threading, which means it can run six threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 2.8 GHz and the CPU can speed up to 4.0 GHz under high load. Despite belonging to the new generation of CPUs, the Core i5-8400 is manufactured in an improved 14nm process.

Performance

The processor offers a strong performance increase compared to the Core i5-7400 due to its two additional cores. Single-core performance has not improved significantly compared to its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a mid-range model, the Core i5-8400 should be suitable for demanding games and programs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-9700Intel Core i5-8400
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-S
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K « 3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 « 3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 « 2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock3700 - 4700 MHz3000 - 4700 MHz2800 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 86 / 6
TDP95 Watt65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14++ nm14 nm
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$359 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9700
34 pt (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
430 Points (48%)
110%
1 i7-9700 +
474 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3165 Points (8%)
2892 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1323     avg: 1374     median: 1362 (9%)     max: 1422 Points
1254 Points (8%)
min: 939     avg: 943     median: 941 (6%)     max: 949 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 187     avg: 192.4     median: 192 (58%)     max: 199 Points
199 Points (60%)
min: 167     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (51%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 13.61     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (20%)     max: 15.64 Points
14.4 Points (19%)
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.11     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (55%)     max: 2.27 Points
2.3 Points (56%)
1.9 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7130     avg: 7302     median: 7328 (44%)     max: 7423 Points
7473 Points (45%)
min: 6356     avg: 6364     median: 6363.5 (38%)     max: 6371 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36392     avg: 38552     median: 39096 (28%)     max: 39624 Points
37381 Points (27%)
min: 30658     avg: 30790     median: 30789.5 (22%)     max: 30921 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
46535 Points (32%)
107%
1 i7-9700 +
49666 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9303 Points (11%)
106%
1 i7-9700 +
9840 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 116.6     avg: 120.8     median: 118.9 (1%)     max: 129.1 s
155.8 s (2%)
191.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.2 (1%)     max: 5.341 s
4.8 s (1%)
6.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7032     avg: 7196     median: 7120 (11%)     max: 7435 Points
6945 Points (11%)
5173 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-9700 +
33539 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-9700 +
5186 MIPS (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 82.1     avg: 85.6     median: 87.2 (30%)     max: 87.4 fps
77.6 fps (27%)
61.4 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 230     avg: 231.7     median: 232 (54%)     max: 233 fps
247.5 fps (57%)
223.8 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.8 fps (19%)
10.5 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.668     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.796 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.3     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (22%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 7.3     median: 8 (21%)     max: 8 GB/s
7.6 GB/s (20%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 312     avg: 332.8     median: 332.8 (2%)     max: 353.5 Seconds
388.7 Seconds (3%)
488 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11599     avg: 11729     median: 11701 (25%)     max: 11886 Points
9474 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.545     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
8.3 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.73     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 18.77 s
18.4 s (1%)
21.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 413.8     avg: 443.5     median: 442.8 (2%)     max: 465.1 s
460.7 s (2%)
526 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i5-8400 +
35310 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13293     avg: 14460     median: 14766 (40%)     max: 15013 Points
13939 Points (38%)
min: 9057     avg: 9453     median: 9453 (26%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 63878     avg: 64781     median: 64445 (52%)     max: 66020 Points
123%
1 i7-9700 +
79476 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 63734     avg: 64731     median: 64316 (52%)     max: 66143 Points
79073 Points (64%)
65891 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63328     avg: 65156     median: 65451.5 (55%)     max: 66393 Points
79079 Points (67%)
69971 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12363     avg: 12530     median: 12521 (32%)     max: 12713 Points
11688 Points (30%)
7891 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18221     avg: 18728     median: 18574 (33%)     max: 19358 Points
16387 Points (29%)
min: 10911     avg: 11774     median: 12066 (22%)     max: 12346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6578     avg: 7256     median: 7255.5 (31%)     max: 7933 Points
6867 Points (29%)
min: 4372     avg: 4941     median: 4940.5 (21%)     max: 5509 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1210 Points (51%)
108%
1 i7-9700 +
1312 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6310 Points (11%)
112%
1 i7-9700 +
7060 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
1300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
7060 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5760     avg: 5827     median: 5783 (58%)     max: 5937 Points
5777 Points (58%)
5104 Points (51%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24546     avg: 24938     median: 25045 (27%)     max: 25223 Points
27040 Points (30%)
20500 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5738     avg: 5754     median: 5754 (78%)     max: 5770 Points
4996 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23187     avg: 23209     median: 23208.5 (57%)     max: 23230 Points
19500 Points (47%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
25920 Points (41%)
19334 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4914 Points (74%)
4283 Points (64%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
753 ms (1%)
100%
1 i7-9700 +
790 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 52.2     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (1%)     max: 59.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 45565     avg: 47064     median: 47063.5 (42%)     max: 48562 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 i7-9700 +
232 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 142.7     avg: 149.4     median: 149.4 (26%)     max: 156 Watt
101%
1 i7-9700 +
143.8 Watt (25%)
108%
1 i5-8400 +
115 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.3     avg: 143.2     median: 143.2 (26%)     max: 152 Watt
100%
1 i7-9700 +
141.9 Watt (26%)
111%
1 i5-8400 +
97 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.36     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (7%)     max: 9.85 Points per Watt
8.8 Points per Watt (7%)
101%
1 i5-8400 +
9.7 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700K → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8400 → 82% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 03. 15:28:15

#0 checking url part for id 9296 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12254 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9298 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9296 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 9296 +0.014s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12254 +0.017s ... 0.059s

#10 got single benchmarks 12254 +0.007s ... 0.066s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9298 +0.003s ... 0.068s

#12 got single benchmarks 9298 +0.008s ... 0.076s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.389s ... 0.465s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.465s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)