Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Apple M2 vs Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FApple M2Intel Core i5-9600K
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeApple M2Intel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz2424 - 3480 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB20 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache9 MB8 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 68 / 86 / 6
TDP65 Watt20 Watt95 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm14++ nm
Voltage100 V
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationARMv8 Instruction SetDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86ARMx86
$182 U.S.$262 U.S.
Announced
Transistors20000 Million
iGPUApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.apple.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (45%)
92%
1 M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
98%
1 M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
123%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
1094 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (48%)
129%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (62%)     max: 229 Points
193 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
7205 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
33950 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (26%)
39494 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
9318 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
176.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
5903 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (21%)
68.8 fps (23%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
250 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
8 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
0.4 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
78%
M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
444.4 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10974 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
37593 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (28%)
11938 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
78929 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
78531 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (60%)
80235 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
9031 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
13701 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
6071 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (65%)     max: 2650 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (39%)     max: 10120 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (45%)
168%
M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (75%)     max: 1953 Points
1217 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
157%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
5855 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
5916 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (22%)
23810 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
193%
1 M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (57%)     max: 78736 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (65%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (38%)
178%
1 M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (68%)     max: 387 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (65%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (74%)     max: 301865 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1936540     avg: 1954930     median: 1961470 (65%)     max: 1966790 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 535127     avg: 540446     median: 537292 (16%)     max: 548919 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (56%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
145.9 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
422%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
134 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
528%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 131% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 107% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 05:16:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753845364s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.012s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.091s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)