Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FIntel Core i5-11400F
CodenameComet LakeRocket Lake
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Rocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB480 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$155 U.S.$157 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size276 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10235 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1339 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (48%)
502 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
3945 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
1574 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (50%)
210 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
17.7 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (48%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
6210 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
44220 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (31%)
57417 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
8876 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
117.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7147 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
41522 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (60%)
5466 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (27%)
91.5 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
258 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
13.5 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.7 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
290.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13359 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
703 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57236 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (36%)
15367 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
71688 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
71496 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (52%)
74053 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
13346 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21144 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
8468 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (48%)     max: 1223 Points
1575 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
7681 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
1543 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
7679 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
6836 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (25%)
30191 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
654 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (39%)
255 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
236 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
204 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 115% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 14:50:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754571055s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.055s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)