Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10200H vs Intel Core i7-10850H

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10850H

The Intel Core i7-10850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.7 and 5.1 GHz (with Thermal Velocity Boost and Turbo Boost 3.0). Using only Turbo Boost 3.0 (when the temperatures don't allow the the Thermal Velocity Boost) a single core can reach 4.9 GHz. All six cores can reach 4.4 GHz. The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10850H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP.

Performance

The average 10850H in our database proves to be a somewhat disappointing CPU, only matching the Core i5-10500H and the Ryzen 5 5500U in multi-thread performance. While the Core i7 will have no issue running any app or any game you can install in 2021, there are better options out there both in terms of sheer power and in terms of power efficiency.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD 630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce somewhat (with 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value) resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, the CPU is way too power-hungry to be the heart of a passively cooled mini-PC, laptop, tablet.

The i7-10850H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10200HIntel Core i7-10850H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H « 2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2700 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1440BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$395 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10850H
34.2 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
419 Points (47%)
494 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2082 Points (5%)
2636 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
842 Points (5%)
1232 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171.6 Points (52%)
203 Points (61%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.2 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7653 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
34586 Points (25%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5519 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
21148 MIPS (12%)
30988 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4497 MIPS (54%)
5241 MIPS (63%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
8.4 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.8 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
515 Seconds (4%)
425 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9471 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
431.6 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6233 Points (17%)
10694 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
7254 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (19%)
14601 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (15%)
4313 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
1305 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
5753 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
882 ms (1%)
737 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
187.3 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10850H → 125% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 18. 19:08:45

#0 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11960 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1721322525 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:44:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11960 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 11960 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.048s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)