Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-8100H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

Intel Core i3-8100H

► remove from comparison Intel i3-8100H

The Intel Core i3-8100H is a mid-range processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced mid 2018. The processor clocks at 3 GHz (no Turbo Boost) and can execute up to four threads simultaneously (no Hyper-Threading). According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelIntel Core i3-8100HIntel Xeon E-2276M
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H « 3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 46 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
34.1 pt (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 E-2276M +
484 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 E-2276M +
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2276M +
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2276M +
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (59%)     max: 201 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 E-2276M +
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 E-2276M +
5214 MIPS (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 E-2276M +
9.7 fps (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 E-2276M +
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 E-2276M +
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-2276M +
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (34%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E-2276M +
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E-2276M +
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 E-2276M +
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
1303 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
24150 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E-2276M +
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E-2276M +
56114 Points (50%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 E-2276M +
220 Points (46%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 03:37:11

#0 checking url part for id 10058 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10058 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 10058 +0s ... 0.034s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.021s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.018s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.086s ... 0.159s

#12 return log +0.033s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)