Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Celeron J3455

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Intel Z8350

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Celeron J3455

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3455

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and Mini-PCs and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 1.5 - 2.3 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3455 is between the mobile Celeron N3450 and Pentium N4200 in the lower range of mobile processors. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for light tasks with not much multitasking (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3455 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly faster Pentium N4200.

ModelIntel Atom x5-Z8350Intel Celeron J3455
SeriesIntel Atom x5Intel Celeron
CodenameCherry TrailApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 compare1.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 compare1.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 « 1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 compare1.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-E8000 compare1.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 « 1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1440 - 1920 MHz1500 - 2300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 500 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS-1600 (12,8 GB/s), USB 3.0, 1x PCIe 2.0Intel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP10 Watt
SocketFCBGA1296
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
0.4 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902.5 (5%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2575     avg: 2939     median: 2978.5 (2%)     max: 3130 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
1108 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
36.2 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 987     avg: 1267     median: 1313 (4%)     max: 1418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
12990 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 8436     avg: 12570     median: 14078 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 929     avg: 1036     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1588 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1126 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1151 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
293 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1024 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (9%)     max: 926 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (3%)     max: 2490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 836     avg: 888     median: 890.5 (12%)     max: 934 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264.5 (6%)     max: 2399 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2130     avg: 2247     median: 2289 (4%)     max: 2332 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 709     avg: 755     median: 760 (15%)     max: 796 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 5047     avg: 5908     median: 5630 (7%)     max: 7230 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 4722     avg: 6393     median: 6494 (6%)     max: 7265 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
58565 Points (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 Z8350 +
3376 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
4671 Points (23%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8350 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3455 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 16:25:06

#0 checking url part for id 8088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13183 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8088 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 8088 +0.047s ... 0.089s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13183 +0.004s ... 0.093s

#9 got single benchmarks 13183 +0.007s ... 0.1s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.213s

#12 return log +0.046s ... 0.259s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)