Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP14 vs Samsung Xclipse 920

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G78 MP14

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP14

The ARM Mali-G78MP14 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the Samsung Exynos 2100 (e.g. Galaxy S21). It integrates 14 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14Samsung Xclipse 920
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Shared Memoryyesnoyes
technology4 nm5 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 26.05.2020 18.01.2022
CodenameValhallRDNA 2
ArchitectureValhallRDNA 2
Pipelines14 - unified192 - unified
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comsemiconductor.samsung.com
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 5873     avg: 5950     median: 5966 (3%)     max: 6010 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
1758 Points (2%)
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
3589 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88848     avg: 96343     median: 98950 (10%)     max: 101231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 7718     avg: 8299     median: 7933 (34%)     max: 9245 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 9794     avg: 10985     median: 9889 (22%)     max: 13273 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 6717     avg: 7688     median: 8001 (34%)     max: 8345 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 7680     avg: 9796     median: 10794 (27%)     max: 10913 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7078     avg: 8019     median: 8019 (71%)     max: 8960 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10216     avg: 11862     median: 11861.5 (71%)     max: 13507 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
7614 Points (37%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
9978 Points (33%)
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.5     median: 76 (14%)     max: 89 fps
min: 25     avg: 26.7     median: 27 (5%)     max: 28 fps
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 49     avg: 60.7     median: 64 (5%)     max: 69 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
min: 42     avg: 54     median: 58 (5%)     max: 62 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
min: 74     avg: 88     median: 83 (2%)     max: 107 fps
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
min: 117     avg: 140.3     median: 143 (6%)     max: 161 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP14
min: 137     avg: 177.7     median: 154 (1%)     max: 242 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
277129 Points (28%)
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (52%)     max: 695509 Points
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
84.4 fps (2%)
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
8695 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP14 → 41% n=13

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 54% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
high
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
103%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
103%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
109%
Mali-G78 MP14:
59  fps
108%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP14:
102 111 ~ 107 fps
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
75%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
55%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
med.
Mali-G78 MP14:
40  fps
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
56%
Mali-G78 MP14:
30 30 40 ~ 33 fps
54%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
0%
Mali-G78 MP14:
0 (!)  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP14 → 69%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 86%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 80%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 80%

Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60606060
Genshin Impact585460605959.559.358.2
Armajet10767
PUBG Mobile8059406040334439.532
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1


2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3

1
1

1
2

1
1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 09. 05:51:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10649 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759981883s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:57 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.044s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.02s ... 0.064s

#10 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.007s ... 0.071s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10649 +0s ... 0.071s

#12 got single benchmarks 10649 +0.005s ... 0.076s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.076s

#14 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.081s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.091s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.091s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.092s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.105s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.105s

#22 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.114s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.115s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.115s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.118s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.118s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.118s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)