Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP14

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G78 MP14

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP14

The ARM Mali-G78MP14 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the Samsung Exynos 2100 (e.g. Galaxy S21). It integrates 14 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesno
technology4 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 26.05.2020
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines14 - unified
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88848     avg: 96343     median: 98950 (10%)     max: 101231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 7718     avg: 8299     median: 7933 (34%)     max: 9245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 9794     avg: 10985     median: 9889 (22%)     max: 13273 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 6717     avg: 7688     median: 8001 (34%)     max: 8345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 7680     avg: 9796     median: 10794 (27%)     max: 10913 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7078     avg: 8019     median: 8019 (71%)     max: 8960 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10216     avg: 11862     median: 11861.5 (71%)     max: 13507 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
7614 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
9978 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 5873     avg: 5950     median: 5966 (3%)     max: 6010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
1758 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
min: 25     avg: 26.7     median: 27 (5%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 49     avg: 60.7     median: 64 (5%)     max: 69 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
min: 42     avg: 54     median: 58 (5%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 74     avg: 88     median: 83 (2%)     max: 107 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
min: 117     avg: 140.3     median: 143 (6%)     max: 161 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP14
min: 137     avg: 177.7     median: 154 (1%)     max: 242 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
277129 Points (28%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
84.4 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP14 → 41% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
high
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
102%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
med.
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
107%
Mali-G78 MP14:
59  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP14:
102 111 ~ 107 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
69%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
med.
Mali-G78 MP14:
40  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
56%
Mali-G78 MP14:
30 30 40 ~ 33 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
0%
Mali-G78 MP14:
0 (!)  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP14 → 67%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Genshin Impact5955606059
Armajet107
PUBG Mobile875940604033
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G78 MP14
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1


2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3

1
1

1
2

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 15:33:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10649 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754573598s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:42 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.014s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10649 +0s ... 0.05s

#11 got single benchmarks 10649 +0.004s ... 0.055s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.067s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.067s

#15 Got 64 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.074s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.074s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.076s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.076s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)