Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 06.12.2018
APIDirectX 12
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.1 pt (3%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.05576 -95%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.0842 -92%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.192 -82%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.097
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 2936%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (2%)     max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 72% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 19:53:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752515625s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.018s ... 0.037s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.043s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.067s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.067s

#15 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.074s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.075s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.078s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.078s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)