Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-10500H

Intel Xeon W-10855M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Xeon W-10855M is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.8 and 4.8 GHz (probably 4.4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10855M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Core i7-10850H with slightly higher clock speeds (+100 MHz base speed). 

Performance

The performance of the Xeon W-10855M should be similar to the old top model Core i7-8950H (6 cores, 2.9 - 4.8 GHz). Thanks to the 6 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run fine on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i5-10500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10500H

The Intel Core i5-10500H is a fast processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on a 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance should be slightly behind the old Core i7-9850H with 6 cores clocked at 2.6 - 4.6 GHz (100 MHz more than the 10500H). Therefore, the performance is well suited for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Xeon W-10855MIntel Core i5-10500H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2800 - 5100 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB153 KB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i5-10500H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10500H
45 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6820     avg: 7104     median: 7103.5 (12%)     max: 7387 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1158     avg: 1160     median: 1159.5 (58%)     max: 1161 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 446     avg: 448     median: 448 (58%)     max: 450 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2842     avg: 2919     median: 2919 (12%)     max: 2996 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1209     avg: 1249     median: 1249 (13%)     max: 1289 Points
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 184.5     avg: 186.3     median: 186.3 (64%)     max: 188 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.8 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7109 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37125 Points (51%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
281 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6194 Points (36%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 33075     avg: 33445     median: 33445 (24%)     max: 33815 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4874     avg: 4886     median: 4885.5 (70%)     max: 4897 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.8 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
227.5 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (20%)     max: 9.73 fps
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 382     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 389 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.645 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11157 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
485.6 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11219     avg: 12299     median: 12299 (43%)     max: 13379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10881     avg: 11086     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16551     avg: 17052     median: 17051.5 (42%)     max: 17552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6016     avg: 6390     median: 6389.5 (34%)     max: 6763 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1296 Points (63%)
min: 1181     avg: 1202     median: 1205.5 (59%)     max: 1214 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6231 Points (22%)
min: 5550     avg: 6139     median: 6332 (22%)     max: 6340 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1200 Points (61%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6233 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5501 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25696 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 813     avg: 819     median: 818.5 (1%)     max: 824 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 218     avg: 223.5     median: 223.5 (59%)     max: 229 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.3     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (17%)     max: 105 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 105.9     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (31%)     max: 125 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (30%)
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.3     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (13%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10855M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10500H → 97% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 10. 01:54:46

#0 checking url part for id 12207 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13217 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#20 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 12207 +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 got single benchmarks 12207 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.019s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 13217 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#27 got single benchmarks 13217 +0.011s ... 0.032s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.048s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.065s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.085s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.089s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.093s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#98 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.093s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.119s

#100 return log +0.004s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)