Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U vs Apple M4 (10 cores)

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155U

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a mid-range Meteor Lake chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 12 cores (2 + 8 + 2) and 14 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 2, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.8 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 4-core Intel Arc Graphics, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 1.95 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.1 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155U comes with 12 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a decent number of PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 7.8 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 155U features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155U is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 155U will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be almost as fast as the Core i7-1340P (Raptor Lake, 12 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.6 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 4-core Arc Graphics runs at up to 1.95 GHz. We expect the iGPU to be about as fast as the aging 96 EU Iris Xe meaning it's good enough for most games, as long as one sticks to 1080p and mostly low quality settings.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc Graphics is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W, with 57 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. An active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 155U is comprised of several small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Apple M4 (10 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (10 cores)

The 10-core Apple M4 is an impressively fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) sporting 4 performance and 6 efficient CPU cores along with a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU with hardware RT support and other modern features. On-package 7500 MT/s LPDDR5x RAM, USB 4 support and Thunderbolt 4 support are onboard as well, as are Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; its 4 performance cores run at up to 4.4 GHz, representing a healthy improvement over the M3 (10-core GPU) and its 4.06 GHz top clock speed. Besides, this new chip also has 6 efficient cores at its disposal that run at up to 2.9 GHz. The M3 had to make do with 4 performance cores and 4 efficient cores, for reference.

Architecture and Features

The new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of while also featuring some minor architectural improvements. A heavily customized version of ARM's v9.4-A microarchitecture is reportedly employed here. The M4 comes with on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (120 GB/s) whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

In 2024 iPad Pros, the 3 nm chip is 10% to 20% faster than the M3 (10 GPU cores) in both multi-thread and single-thread short-term workloads. It also delivers about 10% higher multi-thread performance than the 9-core M4. This puts the 10-core part on an equal footing with the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H and other higher-end x86 processors released in 2023 and 2024.

iPad Pros come with no active cooling solution however Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have one and the latest iMacs probably do as well. As our Fall 2024 Mac mini review shows, the M4's short-term performance doesn't benefit much from the presence of a fan, however its sustained performance benefits tremendously.

Graphics

The M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as 8K.

The graphics adapter runs at higher clock speeds than what the (otherwise identical) 10-core GPU built into the 9-core M4 can muster. As our Mac mini 2024 review confirmed, its performance is good enough to run many 2023 and 2024 games at 1080p on low or medium quality settings.

Much like it is with CPU performance, M4-powered iPad Pros will be much slower in long-term GPU-intensive workloads than iMacs, Mac minis and MacBook Pros due to the lack of proper cooling.

Power consumption

This specific M4 chip is found in 2024 iPad Pros, 2024 iMacs, 2024 Mac minis and 2024 MacBook Pros. Within the thin metal cases of the iPads - no active cooling - the chip's sustained power consumption hovers in the 4 W - 5 W area, with short-term peaks of up to 14 W possible. However, Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have an active cooling solution (and the new iMacs probably do, too) meaning the power consumption figures are several times higher. In our Fall 2024 Mac mini review, the SoC consumed 30 W to 40 W when under high loads.

The M4 is built with a "second generation" 3 nm TSMC process which is still cutting-edge as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155UApple M4 (10 cores)
CodenameMeteor Lake-U
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-UApple M4
Series: M4
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U compare3.6 - 4.4 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M5 (9 Cores) compare - 4.43 GHz9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (10 cores) « 2.89 - 4.46 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores) compare2.9 - 4.4 GHz9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (8 cores) compare2.9 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz2890 - 4464 MHz
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 14
2 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
10 / 10
4 x 4.5 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x 2.9 GHz Apple M4 E-Core
TDP15 Watt40 Watt
Technology7 nm3 nm
max. Temp.110 °C
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHAUnified Memory LPDDR5X-7500 (120 GB/s), 16-Core Neural Engine, Media Engine (Encoding / Decoding: H.264, HEVC, ProRes, ProRes RAW, AV1 Decoding only)
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 1950 MHz)Apple M4 10-core GPU
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L2 Cache4 MB
TDP Turbo PL240 Watt
Transistors28 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155U
34.7 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 90.3     avg: 96.2     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 99.9 Points
min: 173     avg: 174.2     median: 174 (98%)     max: 177 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 487     avg: 549     median: 549 (10%)     max: 611 Points
min: 815     avg: 921     median: 958 (18%)     max: 986 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7884     avg: 9627     median: 9674.5 (9%)     max: 10780 Points
min: 12335     avg: 13338     median: 13833 (13%)     max: 13845 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1265     avg: 1627     median: 1666 (70%)     max: 1782 Points
min: 2165     avg: 2202     median: 2173 (91%)     max: 2269 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 485     avg: 624     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 682 Points
565 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3075     avg: 3721     median: 3721 (9%)     max: 4167 Points
3642 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1378     avg: 1588     median: 1585 (10%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 1901     avg: 1907     median: 1907 (12%)     max: 1913 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 230     avg: 240     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 256 Points
min: 300     avg: 302     median: 302 (84%)     max: 304 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 33897     avg: 38450     median: 38494.5 (22%)     max: 41498 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3666     avg: 4665     median: 4868 (57%)     max: 4920 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.41     avg: 10.7     median: 10.9 (19%)     max: 12.4 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 548     avg: 628     median: 626 (8%)     max: 749 Seconds
min: 389     avg: 397     median: 397 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 309     avg: 346     median: 343.5 (2%)     max: 410 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4853     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.947 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12165     avg: 13883     median: 14097 (35%)     max: 15332 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70865 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
71152 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74670 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11846     avg: 12733     median: 12710 (32%)     max: 13666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17833     avg: 19594     median: 19796 (35%)     max: 21085 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5579     avg: 6483     median: 6534.5 (28%)     max: 7373 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1534     avg: 2195     median: 2312 (56%)     max: 2382 Points
min: 3655     avg: 3747     median: 3748.5 (91%)     max: 3838 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 7592     avg: 8981     median: 9278 (36%)     max: 9829 Points
min: 14690     avg: 14978     median: 14987.5 (58%)     max: 15173 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 891     avg: 1561     median: 1690 (64%)     max: 1717 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6989     avg: 8093     median: 8339.5 (15%)     max: 8805 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 525     avg: 548     median: 543.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
min: 262     avg: 277.7     median: 265.4 (0%)     max: 318.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 105178     avg: 111471     median: 110817 (81%)     max: 118492 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 247.5     median: 246.5 (68%)     max: 253 Points
min: 315     avg: 335     median: 334 (92%)     max: 348 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 136.4     avg: 249.2     median: 267 (48%)     max: 286 Points
min: 430     avg: 467.6     median: 478 (86%)     max: 482 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
2716980 Points (87%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
743583 Points (74%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1393     avg: 1485     median: 1483 (55%)     max: 1566 Points
min: 1944     avg: 2015     median: 2038 (76%)     max: 2066 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.9     avg: 49.6     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 57.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 51.5     avg: 63.1     median: 68.6 (13%)     max: 69.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.25     avg: 5.3     median: 4.9 (3%)     max: 6.42 Watt
min: 2.68     avg: 3.1     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 4.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (8%)     max: 7.59 Watt
min: 2.68     avg: 3.9     median: 4.1 (5%)     max: 4.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.1     avg: 27.5     median: 27.5 (20%)     max: 29.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155U → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (10 cores) → 146% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 12. 04:32:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16915 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17538 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760236338s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16915 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16915 +0.013s ... 0.026s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17538 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 17538 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.06s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)