Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

Intel UHD Graphics 617

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 617 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 617 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process. Compared to the similar UHD Graphics 615 in other Amber Lake models, the 617 looks to be higher clocked (+50 MHz) and has more headroom due to the higher TDP of 7 versus 5 Watt.

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 617 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 617 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 / 617 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 617 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 617 can be found in Y processors with 7 W TDP  and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled subnotebooks like the MacBook Air 2018.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

► remove from comparison

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 (GT4e) is an integrated professional graphics unit of the Skylake generation (top version). As successors of the Iris Graphics 6200 (Broadwell), the Iris P580 can be found in some high-end Xeon quad core CPUs and offers 128 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT4e-version features 72 Execution Units (EUs). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 580 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Compared to the consumer Iris Pro Graphics 580, the P580 is only included in the Xeon processors and intended for professional applications (certified drivers?) similar to the Quadro and Fire Pro lines. 

Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 (28 W GT3e), the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers more EUs (72 vs. 48) and a larger eDRAM Cache (128 vs. 64 MB).

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Graphics P580 depends on memory configuration and CPU model (different clock speeds). However, it should be clearly faster than the old Broadwell Iris Pro 6200 and may compete with a dedicated GeForce 945M. Modern games of 2015/2016 should be playable in medium settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Graphics P580 can be found in some mobile high-end quad core processors (45 W). Therefore, they are most likely not used in thin and light laptops.

Intel UHD Graphics 617Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby-Lake GT2Skylake GT4e
ArchitectureGen. 9 Amber LakeGen. 9 Skylake
Pipelines24 - unified72 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3eDRAM
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement30.10.2018 24.01.2016
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB
CPU in UHD Graphics 617GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-10510Y4 x 1200 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8210Y2 x 1600 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics P580GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v54 x 3000 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 322     avg: 338.3     median: 337 (1%)     max: 356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 286     avg: 299     median: 300 (1%)     max: 311 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77156 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4841 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
7231 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 845     avg: 890     median: 889.5 (2%)     max: 934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 947     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
3711 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
4496 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1632     avg: 1672     median: 1671.5 (2%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1509     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (1%)     max: 1572 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 617
3DMark 06
8662 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.7     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (2%)     max: 43.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
20.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
14.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
12.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
61.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
26  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
16.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
67.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
28.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
14.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
13.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
47.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
27.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
25  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
8.4  fps

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Intel UHD Graphics 617lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.214.112.8
Rocket League61.22618.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16.1
Dota 2 Reborn67.228.214.613.6
BioShock Infinite47.627.9258.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1
2
4


4


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 07. 10:47:39

#0 checking url part for id 9356 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7172 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:42:36 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.113s ... 0.115s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.115s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.115s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9356 +0.026s ... 0.141s

#8 got single benchmarks 9356 +0.01s ... 0.151s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7172 +0.002s ... 0.153s

#10 got single benchmarks 7172 +0.005s ... 0.158s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.158s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.102s ... 0.26s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.26s

#14 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.265s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.265s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.269s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.28s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.28s

#19 return log +0.054s ... 0.335s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)