Notebookcheck Logo

ThinkPad P1 Gen 7's 165 Hz screen leads to lower battery life: Why did Lenovo not implement Dynamic Refresh Rate?

ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 165 Hz screen leads to lower battery life: Why did Lenovo not implement Dynamic Refreh Rate? (image source: Benjamin Herzig)
ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 165 Hz screen leads to lower battery life: Why did Lenovo not implement Dynamic Refreh Rate? (image source: Benjamin Herzig)
High refresh rate screens are becoming more popular with laptops, but often, the dynamic refresh rate setting is missing, driving up the power consumption. The Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 is an example for that.

Screens with a high refresh rate are great. Gaming looks much smoother, same goes for scrolling through the web. Recent premium phones have had high refresh rate panels for a while now, and premium laptops are also adopting such displays. One example is the Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7, which we recently thoroughly reviewed. The WQXGA (2,560 x 1,600) LCD of the ThinkPad supports a refresh rate of 165 Hz.

However, there is a problem: A faster screen consumes more energy. The result is a lower battery life. We have tested it: With the screen set to 165 Hz, the ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 (available at Amazon.com for $1,899) lasts seven hours and 30 minutes in the Wi-Fi battery test (maximum screen brightness). Changing the refresh rate to 60 Hz, the ThinkPad P1 G7 lasts longer. In the 60 Hz mode, the Lenovo laptop runs for nine hours.

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh (Edge 129 (60 Hz))
539 min
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh (Edge 129)
451 min -16%

The influence of the screen refresh rate on the battery life could be much smaller, since Windows offers a feature called Dynamic Refresh Rate - if this setting is enabled, the screen automatically switches between 60 Hz and 165 Hz, saving energy. Unfortunately, the Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 does not support this setting. Why Lenovo did not implement this is hard to understand for us. It would be a low-hanging fruit, an easy way to improve battery life. Thus, users have to choose: A smoother user experience or a shorter battery life, there is no in between.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2024 10 > ThinkPad P1 Gen 7's 165 Hz screen leads to lower battery life: Why did Lenovo not implement Dynamic Refresh Rate?
Benjamin Herzig, 2024-10-19 (Update: 2024-10-17)