The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 100%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 88%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 94%n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 22. 08:02:00
#0 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 339 +0.012s ... 0.037s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.038s
#10 got single benchmarks 322 +0.094s ... 0.132s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.002s ... 0.134s
#12 got single benchmarks 323 +0.039s ... 0.174s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.174s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.09s ... 0.264s