The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 83%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 84%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 26. 05:21:44
#0 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.003s ... 0.026s
#8 got single benchmarks 339 +0.015s ... 0.041s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.003s ... 0.044s
#10 got single benchmarks 168 +0.09s ... 0.135s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.138s
#12 got single benchmarks 340 +0.046s ... 0.183s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.183s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.111s ... 0.295s