Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5750
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2400 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800667
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million291 Million
65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478 PBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Steepstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$307 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T5750 +
1.1 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (21%)     max: 2598 Points
81%
1 T7250 +
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (17%)     max: 2093 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (5%)     max: 4665 Points
81%
1 T7250 +
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (4%)     max: 3822 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
101%
1 T5750 +
41.3 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1714     avg: 1732     median: 1738 (4%)     max: 1745 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
28 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
99%
1 T7250 +
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1266 s (6%)
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
1523 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
22156 MIPS (11%)
82%
1 T7250 +
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
81%
1 T7250 +
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
81%
1 T7250 +
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)
92%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5750 +
min: 3375     avg: 3413     median: 3412.5 (3%)     max: 3450 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 93% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 94% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 09. 07:02:27

#0 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:40:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.018s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.002s ... 0.019s

#8 got single benchmarks 323 +0.041s ... 0.06s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.002s ... 0.062s

#10 got single benchmarks 340 +0.032s ... 0.094s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.002s ... 0.096s

#12 got single benchmarks 407 +0.022s ... 0.118s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.173s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.173s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)