The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 93%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 97%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 06. 04:11:02
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.003s ... 0.024s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.041s ... 0.065s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.003s ... 0.068s
#10 got single benchmarks 438 +0.046s ... 0.114s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.117s
#12 got single benchmarks 340 +0.048s ... 0.165s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.165s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.278s