Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H vs Intel Core i5-7267U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 6850H

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is a processor for big (workstation) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. This is a professional version of the consumer R7 6800H with additional managment features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6850H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-11800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 9 4900H in multi-thread benchmark scores. Which puts it slightly behind the powerful 12th Gen Alder Lake-H processors; still, this is a more than decent option for your 3D-rendering jobs and gaming on the go as energy efficiency is good here. More on that below.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-7267U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-7267U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.1-3.5 GHz (two cores also up to 3.5 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7500U (2.7-3.5 GHz, no eDRAM, 15 Watts), but it should be a bit slower on practice due to the missing level 4 eDRAM and the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HIntel Core i5-7267U
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Kaby Lake
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Kaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U « 3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4700 MHz3100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 4
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology6 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2BGA1356
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$304 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 6850H
34.3 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12016     avg: 12393     median: 12393 (12%)     max: 12770 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1469     avg: 1480     median: 1480 (62%)     max: 1491 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 564     avg: 574     median: 576 (63%)     max: 583 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2990     avg: 4274     median: 4887 (12%)     max: 4946 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2081     avg: 2086     median: 2085.5 (13%)     max: 2090 Points
383 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 166.2     avg: 205.1     median: 205.1 (57%)     max: 244 Points
141 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.3 Points (28%)
4.1 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (62%)
1.5 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5791 Points (35%)
5010 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
34412 Points (25%)
11403 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
103.6 s (1%)
492 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.7 s (1%)
15.6 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5263 Points (8%)
3243 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52391     avg: 54445     median: 54444.5 (31%)     max: 56498 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5374     avg: 5417     median: 5417 (64%)     max: 5460 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
104.1 fps (3%)
21.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
222.5 fps (6%)
119.4 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.3 (25%)     max: 15.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.1 GB/s (24%)
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 414     avg: 469.5     median: 469.5 (6%)     max: 525 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 235     avg: 241.5     median: 241.5 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.516     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.524 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11620 Points (25%)
4378 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
0.9 s (0%)
12.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.7 s (1%)
27.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
800 s (4%)
626 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12978     avg: 13828     median: 13828 (34%)     max: 14678 Points
4896 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44493 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16089     avg: 16231     median: 16230.5 (41%)     max: 16372 Points
3712 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23064     avg: 23155     median: 23155 (41%)     max: 23246 Points
5169 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8354     avg: 8631     median: 8631 (36%)     max: 8908 Points
2044 Points (9%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2061 Points (51%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9461 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1474     avg: 1478     median: 1477.5 (58%)     max: 1481 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8093     avg: 8472     median: 8472 (15%)     max: 8851 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3972     avg: 4182     median: 4181.5 (42%)     max: 4391 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8084     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (9%)     max: 9328 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 586     avg: 599     median: 599 (1%)     max: 612 ms
820 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
110.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38960 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 166.7     avg: 179.6     median: 179.6 (49%)     max: 192.4 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 218     avg: 232     median: 232 (42%)     max: 246 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1336     avg: 1407     median: 1407 (53%)     max: 1478 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 51     avg: 76.5     median: 76.5 (13%)     max: 101.9 Watt
42.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
103 Watt (19%)
29.5 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.57     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (6%)     max: 10.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
8.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
20.2 Points per Watt (15%)
13 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7267U → 42% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 25. 16:27:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14374 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8454 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758810433s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14374 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14374 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8454 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 8454 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.057s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)