Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R7 5800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series processor at launch. They are clocked at 1.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5800U in our database matches the Core i5-11260H and, perhaps a little disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 4800U in multi-core performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the ProBook x360 435 G8 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5800U that we know of. It can be more than 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Choosing the lowest value would allow one to build a passively cooled system around the Ryzen, however, most laptop manufacturers will do the opposite to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The Ryzen 7 5800U is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800UAMD Ryzen 7 5800U
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Cezanne-U (Zen 3)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-U (Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U « 1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U compare2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U compare2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4200 MHz1900 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP15 Watt25 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800U
37.3 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
min: 7872     avg: 8851     median: 8154 (8%)     max: 10624 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
min: 1415     avg: 1425     median: 1427 (61%)     max: 1430 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
min: 551     avg: 555     median: 555 (62%)     max: 560 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
min: 2995     avg: 3347     median: 3303 (8%)     max: 3691 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
min: 1390     avg: 1628     median: 1613 (10%)     max: 1925 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
min: 227     avg: 228.5     median: 229 (69%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
6039 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
26711 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
46311 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11485 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
136.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
min: 39618     avg: 42703     median: 42603.5 (24%)     max: 45985 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
min: 5285     avg: 5354     median: 5362.5 (64%)     max: 5405 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
80.8 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
230.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
min: 9.68     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (18%)     max: 11 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
min: 319     avg: 353.4     median: 351.9 (2%)     max: 391 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.546 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
21.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
514 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
min: 10893     avg: 12059     median: 12124 (33%)     max: 13093 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58600 Points (48%)
75960 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58705 Points (48%)
75286 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67233 Points (57%)
83999 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
min: 12642     avg: 13408     median: 13484 (34%)     max: 14021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
min: 15881     avg: 17158     median: 17427.5 (31%)     max: 17897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
min: 5352     avg: 5793     median: 5704 (24%)     max: 6410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
min: 1411     avg: 1430     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1450 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
min: 6093     avg: 6641     median: 6722.5 (12%)     max: 7026 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1162 Points (5%)
1411 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7298 Points (23%)
7053 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
5878 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
28418 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
min: 632     avg: 636     median: 633 (1%)     max: 646 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36619 Points (33%)
min: 63284     avg: 65366     median: 64961 (58%)     max: 67852 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
min: 248     avg: 252.3     median: 249 (52%)     max: 260 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1335 Points (51%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
min: 28     avg: 30     median: 28.9 (5%)     max: 34.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 34.1     median: 33.2 (6%)     max: 42.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
min: 43.5     avg: 48     median: 48.3 (36%)     max: 51.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800U → 109% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 08:35:15

#0 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12976 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.016s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.017s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12976 +0.016s ... 0.073s

#9 got single benchmarks 12976 +0.034s ... 0.107s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.288s ... 0.394s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.418s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)