The AMD Ryzen 5 2600H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.2 (base) - 3.6 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders, unverified). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.
Compared to the older Ryzen 5 2500U for slim and light laptops, the 2600H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.3 versus 2 GHz) and a faster integrated GPU.
More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.
The performance should be slightly better than the Ryzen 5 2600U due to the higher TDP and base clock speed. Especially longer loads should profit from this. Due to the high TDP (configurable from 35 - 54 Watt), the Ryzen 7 2600H is best suited for bigger laptops.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X is a desktop processor with 4 cores and Hyper Threading (SMT). It is the fastest Ryzen 5 quad-core processor in the beginning of 2017, but the 65-watt TDP is similar to the hexa-core Ryzen 5 1600.
The Ryzen 5 1500X has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz and can reach up to 3.7 GHz via Turbo (up to 2 cores) or 3.9 GHz via XFR (also up to 2 cores).
The processor based on the Zen architecture is not fully convincing in games. AMD blames missing optimizations from the gaming producers.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is a desktop processor with 4 cores and Hyper Threading (SMT). It is the slowest Ryzen 5 quad-core processor in the beginning of 2017, but the 65-watt TDP is similar to the hexa-core Ryzen 5 1600.
The Ryzen 5 1400 has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 3.4 GHz via Turbo (up to 2 cores) or 3.45 GHz via XFR (also up to 2 cores). The maximum clock for 3-4 cores is 3.2 GHz.
The processor based on the Zen architecture is not fully convincing in games. AMD blames missing optimizations from the gaming producers.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 03. 16:55:21
#0 checking url part for id 10146 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9166 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9134 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10146 +0.002s ... 0.026s
#8 got single benchmarks 10146 +0.012s ... 0.038s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9166 +0.016s ... 0.054s
#10 got single benchmarks 9166 +0.01s ... 0.064s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9134 +0.014s ... 0.078s
#12 got single benchmarks 9134 +0.008s ... 0.086s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.266s ... 0.352s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card