Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Core i7-7920HQ

Intel Celeron N3050

► remove from comparison Intel N3050

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2815 (1.86 - 2.13 GHz), the N3050 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Core i7-7920HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7920HQ

The Intel Core i7-7920HQ is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer series at the time of the announcement. Only the Xeon E3-1535M v6 is faster (100 - 200 MHz higher Turbo clocks). Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 3.1-4.1 GHz (4 cores up to 3.7 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.9 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance is a bit higher compared to the Skylake predecessor Core i7-6920HQ (2.9-3.8 GHz) thanks to slightly higher clocks (up to 7.9%), so it is the fastest mobile consumer processor in the beginning of 2017 (mobile Xeon E5-1535M v6 has even higher Turbo clocks). The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelIntel Celeron N3050Intel Core i7-7920HQ
CodenameBraswellKaby Lake
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Kaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 « 1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ « 3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2160 MHz3100 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
TDP6 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$378 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB

Benchmarks

814 Points (5%)
163 Points (45%)
8.9 Points (12%)
1.9 Points (44%)
6169 Points (37%)
24138 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 2935     avg: 2943     median: 2943 (2%)     max: 2951 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1568     avg: 1573     median: 1572.5 (2%)     max: 1577 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1740     avg: 1757     median: 1757 (21%)     max: 1773 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 52     avg: 54.4     median: 55.2 (11%)     max: 56.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 514     avg: 548     median: 529 (1%)     max: 619 Points
5228 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 4.7     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (0%)     max: 4.77 fps
50.6 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 22.98     avg: 24.8     median: 25.5 (1%)     max: 25.8 fps
189.6 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.04     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.059 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.063     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0939 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.337     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.427 GB/s
4.6 GB/s (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 943     avg: 1150     median: 1243 (3%)     max: 1263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 32.6     median: 33.6 (7%)     max: 41.3 s
9.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61     avg: 82     median: 88 (4%)     max: 91.1 s
21.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1566     avg: 1829     median: 1896.5 (8%)     max: 1956 s
536 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N3050 +
2247 Points (2%)
10006 Points (25%)
54313 Points (44%)
8483 Points (21%)
11841 Points (21%)
14987 Points (27%)
3906 Points (51%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1594     avg: 1616     median: 1615.5 (3%)     max: 1637 Points
15856 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 895     avg: 905     median: 904.5 (14%)     max: 914 Points
4112 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3050 +
2477 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3050 +
2241 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3050 +
2168 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3050 +
2115 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
2194 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4926     avg: 5391     median: 5082.5 (6%)     max: 7633 ms
904 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 378.8     avg: 407.1     median: 406.4 (4%)     max: 444.5 ms
66.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 4059     avg: 6704     median: 7291 (5%)     max: 7545 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3050 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7920HQ → 793% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 12:38:01

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6781 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8412 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765625881s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Dec 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6781 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 6781 +0.015s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8412 +0s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 8412 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.046s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)