Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G715 MP7 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP22

ARM Mali-G715 MP7

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G715 MP7

The ARM Mali-G715 MP7 is one of the high-end graphics card and is used in this form for the first time in the smartphones of the Google Pixel 8 series in interaction with the Google Tensor G3. 

The ARM Mali-G715 is based on the fourth generation Valhall architecture and shows improvements in the areas of efficiency and machine learning (ML) in particular. It also masters new features such as variable rate shading, matrix multiply instructions and an improved execution engine.

The performance positions the G715MP7 between the Adreno 725 (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2) and Adreno 730 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1) in synthetic benchmarks (3DMark and GFXBench).

Unlike the Immortalis variants, which have at least 10 cores (e.g. Immortalis-G715 MP11), the ARM Mali-G715 MP7 does not support hardware-based ray tracing.

The G715MP7 in the Tensor G3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
ARM Mali-G715 MP7ARM Mali-G78 MP22
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallValhall
Pipelines11 - unified24 - unified
Shared Memoryyesno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.11.2021 26.05.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CPU in Mali-G715 MP7GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Google Tensor G48 x 1950 MHz? MHz940 MHz
Google Tensor G39 x 1700 MHz? MHz890 MHz
min. - max.? MHz890 - 940 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 11317     avg: 11366     median: 11366 (49%)     max: 11415 Points
11598 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17527     avg: 17630     median: 17629.5 (39%)     max: 17732 Points
16653 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 7856     avg: 10314     median: 10594 (45%)     max: 11584 Points
9630 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 13546     avg: 15156     median: 15399 (38%)     max: 16473 Points
12079 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 8922     avg: 9174     median: 9150 (5%)     max: 9476 Points
6399 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2353     avg: 2517     median: 2560.5 (3%)     max: 2605 Points
1805 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.3     median: 19 (7%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 40.1     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 44 fps
31 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 96     avg: 107     median: 108.5 (8%)     max: 119 fps
76 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 74     avg: 79.6     median: 79 (7%)     max: 90 fps
64 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 139     median: 153 (3%)     max: 167 fps
112 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 97     avg: 224.3     median: 241 (10%)     max: 355 fps
154 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G715 MP7
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 317     avg: 383     median: 386 (3%)     max: 423 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
232 fps (2%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 190098     avg: 273681     median: 273680 (27%)     max: 357263 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 370494     avg: 412209     median: 412603 (33%)     max: 447588 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 142.2     avg: 150.8     median: 152.8 (4%)     max: 157.4 fps
74.4 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 5070     avg: 6179     median: 6481.5 (2%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 5944     avg: 6768     median: 6963 (2%)     max: 7835 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.05     avg: 7.6     median: 8.2 (3%)     max: 8.42 Watt
11.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G715 MP7 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 76% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
58 58.6 ~ 58 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
111.4  fps
high
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
59.3  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
53.7 55.9 58 ~ 56 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
48.1  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
45.8 47.4 55 ~ 49 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
52.3 57.8 58.8 ~ 56 fps
high
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
53.8 58.3 58.8 58.8 ~ 57 fps
53%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
39.2 39.3 39.6 39.7 ~ 39 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G715 MP7:
90.4  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G715 MP7 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 53%

ARM Mali-G715 MP7ARM Mali-G78 MP22
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58
League of Legends: Wild Rift111.459.3
Genshin Impact5648.149
PUBG Mobile56573930
Dead Trigger 290.4
ARM Mali-G715 MP7ARM Mali-G78 MP22
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

1


2
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 20:22:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11628 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752517330s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11628 +0.016s ... 0.039s

#9 got single benchmarks 11628 +0.013s ... 0.051s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0s ... 0.052s

#11 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.058s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.068s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.068s

#19 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.078s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.078s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.078s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.081s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.081s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.082s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)