Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M1 Max vs Intel Core i5-10200H

Apple M1 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Max

The Apple M1 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 48 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (32 or 64 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU. This is the main difference to the M1 Pro and the CPU performance is quite similar.

The biggest difference to the M1 Pro is the bigger integrated GPU with 24 or 32 cores (up from 16).

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including two ProRes engines).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 57 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. 

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelApple M1 MaxIntel Core i5-10200H
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Apple M1 Max « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2060 - 3220 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache2.9 MB256 KB
L2 Cache28 MB1 MB
L3 Cache48 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 104 / 8
Transistors57000 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUApple M1 Max 32-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameComet Lake-H
TDP45 Watt
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1440
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12385     avg: 12389     median: 12386 (12%)     max: 12396 Points
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1530     avg: 1533     median: 1533 (65%)     max: 1536 Points
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 390     avg: 393.3     median: 395 (44%)     max: 395 Points
419 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2735     avg: 2746     median: 2750 (7%)     max: 2753 Points
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1689     avg: 1691     median: 1691 (11%)     max: 1693 Points
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 197     avg: 202.3     median: 200 (60%)     max: 210 Points
171.6 Points (52%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4497 MIPS (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 187     avg: 188.7     median: 189 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6233 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1780     median: 1782 (75%)     max: 1795 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12563     avg: 12656     median: 12697 (23%)     max: 12708 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 404.3     avg: 459.2     median: 482.3 (1%)     max: 491.1 ms
882 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 66938     avg: 68647     median: 68029 (61%)     max: 70973 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 350     avg: 358.7     median: 360 (75%)     max: 366 Points
187.3 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 1586     avg: 1607     median: 1615 (62%)     max: 1621 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
50.8 Watt (9%)
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
53 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
11.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M1 Max +
31.9 Points per Watt (24%)
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Max → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 70% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 14:55:02

#0 checking url part for id 13843 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13843 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 13843 +0.011s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.016s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.013s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.167s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.191s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)