Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 4K laptop review: High-performance 14-inch 2-in-1 now also with 4K touchscreen and Intel Core i7-1185G7

We've already reviewed the entry-level configuration with a Core i5 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and a 1080p display. Now we have the top model with a Core i7 Tiger Lake processor, a 4K touchscreen, and 16 GB of RAM in our hands. Naturally, we'll compare both configurations and look at the gain in benefits.
Since everything has remained the same externally, we will skip the sections that cover the case, connectivity, and input devices, unless there are significant differences, of course. You can find the details on these sections in the first review of the Lenovo Yoga 9i 14.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % | 02/2021 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
87.1 % | 12/2020 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % | 03/2020 | Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % | 08/2020 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.2 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % | 12/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Case - Leather on the lid
Our new test model has been provided with the optional leather cover for the display lid. The dark animal skin comes from "responsible sources" and looks really good.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Size comparison
Connectivity
Communication
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average of class Convertible (138 - 1468, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average of class Convertible (136 - 1585, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 |
Webcam

Accessories
Input devices - Yoga 9i 14 with click problems
Touchpad
While the pad had already performed rather moderately in the original test, the current ClickPad is a middling disaster, at least its buttons are. It was the rule rather than the exception for the click buttons to jam and, therefore, not trigger or trigger too late when they finally became unstuck.
It was almost worse to experience long-pressed clicks being constantly "released" when attempting to perform drag-and-drop actions; dragging and dropping items is hardly possible in this way. This might be an isolated error in our test unit, but buyers should absolutely check the touchpad before buying; it could be a weak point of the still quite expensive high-end device.
The fact that the touchpad is not separated from the rest of the palm rest in terms of feel is also suboptimal; you can't feel any boundaries, which is unsettling.
Display - Lenovo panel with 4K and HDR
Instead of a 1080p one, a 4K UHD IPS touchscreen is now installed. The panel is supposed to have a brightness of up to 500 nits and is HDR 400 VESA certified.
We actually measure a maximum brightness of 493 nits; the display reaches an average of 453 nits with an acceptable brightness distribution of 85%.
Screen bleeding isn't a problem with this model.
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 494 cd/m²
Contrast: 1643:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K Lenovo CSOT3 MNE001EA1-2, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 LG Display LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML CMN N140HCE-ET2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -15% | -49% | -14% | -14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 94.4 | 64.2 -32% | 67.9 -28% | 40.47 -57% | 69.6 -26% | 69.9 -26% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 94.2 -5% | 98.3 -1% | 60 -40% | 98.9 0% | 99.2 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84 | 65 -23% | 70.1 -17% | 41.81 -50% | 71.5 -15% | 71.5 -15% |
Response Times | -54% | -39% | -23% | -67% | -32% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 55.2 ? -21% | 35.6 ? 22% | 36.4 ? 20% | 60.8 ? -33% | 47.6 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.4 ? | 34.4 ? -87% | 36.8 ? -100% | 30.4 ? -65% | 36.8 ? -100% | 29.2 ? -59% |
PWM Frequency | 27030 ? | 2500 ? | ||||
Screen | -17% | -26% | -81% | -26% | 2% | |
Brightness middle | 493 | 365 -26% | 329.9 -33% | 272.5 -45% | 447.4 -9% | 549.8 12% |
Brightness | 453 | 346 -24% | 315 -30% | 260 -43% | 420 -7% | 520 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 82 -4% | 90 6% | 88 4% | 85 0% | 86 1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.23 23% | 0.29 3% | 0.42 -40% | 0.31 -3% | 0.39 -30% |
Contrast | 1643 | 1587 -3% | 1138 -31% | 649 -60% | 1443 -12% | 1410 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.65 -66% | 3.68 -67% | 4.65 -111% | 4.23 -92% | 2.12 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.6 | 6.69 -19% | 8.64 -54% | 17.78 -218% | 9.34 -67% | 3.66 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.61 -34% | 1.03 14% | 4.34 -262% | 1.32 -10% | 1.37 -14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 4 -11% | 6.4 -78% | 4.4 -22% | 6.1 -69% | 2.6 28% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.11 104% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6754 96% | 6873 95% | 6195 105% | 6984 93% | 6136 106% | 6884 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.2 | 60.1 -20% | 63.6 -15% | 38.4 -49% | 64.8 -14% | 65.4 -13% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 93.9 -5% | 98.4 -1% | 59.8 -40% | 98.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-22% | -27% /
-26% | -51% /
-67% | -36% /
-29% | -15% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
The black level and contrast are at a good level, but the 4K model is already better calibrated out of the box, so color deviations are even smaller.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Top graphics, poor long-term CPU performance
Instead of an Intel Core i5-1135G7, Lenovo now uses an Intel Core i7-1185G7. RAM has been doubled to 16 GB, and the SSD now holds 1 TB of data.
We ran all benchmarks using the Maximum Performance mode in Lenovo's Vantage software in order to achieve the best possible results.
Processor
The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is the fastest Tiger Lake G7 CPU for laptops. Its four cores clock between 3 GHz and 4.8 GHz. Additionally, the not-uncontroversial Intel vPro (Wikipedia, news) is supported. It should be well-equipped for all the tasks that the convertible has to do.
In the Cinebench R15 loop, the long-term performance of the nominally stronger processor is disappointing in any case. However, the short-term output is significantly higher than that of the Intel Core i5-1135G7, so there's a performance gain in short tasks. But the long-term performance is even lower than that of the lower-end model! The CPU performance is nowhere near the one of the Ryzen 7 4700U in the Asus VivoBook Flip and neither is the output power.
In the first loop, the TDP briefly reaches 44 watts. After that, it drops to 25 to 27 watts. When a new loop is started, the TDP only reaches 35 to 40 watts. After only one second, the value drops to 25 watts again, and even to 20 watts in the subsequent loops.
On battery power, we measure a performance drop of only about 5% in Cinebench R15.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (489 - 593, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 727, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 5680, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (1425 - 2493, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (168 - 230, n=27) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 271, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2332, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (617 - 1066, n=32) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Convertible (218 - 4249, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (478 - 745, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (3678 - 5507, n=27) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average of class Convertible (2046 - 5897, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (5394 - 61169, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (18812 - 27693, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (1398 - 1626, n=21) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average of class Convertible (260 - 1822, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 12374, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (4620 - 5944, n=21) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 17.2, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (5.02 - 8.13, n=27) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Convertible (35.3 - 223, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (41.3 - 61.7, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4592 - 2.12, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (0.55 - 0.615, n=27) |
* ... smaller is better
System performance
In PCMark, the Yoga 9i performs about 3% to 5% below an average Intel Core i7-1185G7. The differences between the rivals are otherwise rather small. Everyday work is mostly smooth.
PCMark 10 Score | 4765 points | |
Help |
DPC latencies
There are latencies when opening multiple browser tabs. YouTube playback of our 4K/60 fps test video caused eight dropped frames.
Problems are caused by the ACPI Driver for NT, a network driver, and the Kernel-Mode Driver Framework, among others.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
* ... smaller is better
Storage
Lenovo installs a 1 TB NVMe SSD from Western Digital. The PCIe 3.0 model ranks 15th in our SSD/HDD ranking, so it's fast. Our measurements confirm this; it even outperforms the Samsung PM981a SSD found in the lower-end Yoga 9i.
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | -10% | -24% | -8% | -20% | 1% | |
Write 4K | 161.8 | 139.6 -14% | 125.6 -22% | 121.2 -25% | 112.6 -30% | 106.7 -34% | 139.9 ? -14% |
Read 4K | 40.67 | 37.3 -8% | 43.46 7% | 49.91 23% | 131 222% | 49.94 23% | 44.5 ? 9% |
Write Seq | 1873 | 1827 -2% | 2011 7% | 1090 -42% | 458.9 -75% | 1223 -35% | 2346 ? 25% |
Read Seq | 2059 | 2253 9% | 2046 -1% | 1533 -26% | 1355 -34% | 1801 -13% | 2102 ? 2% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 530 | 467.9 -12% | 375.8 -29% | 393.3 -26% | 341.3 -36% | 325.3 -39% | 442 ? -17% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 440.4 | 366.7 -17% | 338.1 -23% | 406 -8% | 320.6 -27% | 551 25% | 460 ? 4% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3005 | 2349 -22% | 2346 -22% | 1225 -59% | 1219 -59% | 1224 -59% | 3049 ? 1% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3370 | 3540 5% | 3562 6% | 2277 -32% | 2462 -27% | 2350 -30% | 3285 ? -3% |
AS SSD | -43% | -50% | -65% | -95% | -286% | -16% | |
Seq Read | 2793 | 2177 -22% | 1719 -38% | 1397 -50% | 1039 -63% | 1801 -36% | 2606 ? -7% |
Seq Write | 1292 | 813 -37% | 1211 -6% | 783 -39% | 310.1 -76% | 1125 -13% | 1935 ? 50% |
4K Read | 46.5 | 53.2 14% | 53.1 14% | 48.08 3% | 76 63% | 39.7 -15% | 42.9 ? -8% |
4K Write | 220.8 | 180 -18% | 131.4 -40% | 134.6 -39% | 118 -47% | 67 -70% | 129.1 ? -42% |
4K-64 Read | 1118 | 531 -53% | 508 -55% | 835 -25% | 371.8 -67% | 1253 12% | 1361 ? 22% |
4K-64 Write | 1573 | 398.5 -75% | 883 -44% | 734 -53% | 469.5 -70% | 209 -87% | 1920 ? 22% |
Access Time Read * | 0.041 | 0.052 -27% | 0.05 -22% | 0.081 -98% | 0.067 -63% | 0.069 -68% | 0.0689 ? -68% |
Access Time Write * | 0.017 | 0.058 -241% | 0.085 -400% | 0.084 -394% | 0.138 -712% | 0.625 -3576% | 0.06215 ? -266% |
Score Read | 1444 | 802 -44% | 733 -49% | 1022 -29% | 552 -62% | 1472 2% | 1664 ? 15% |
Score Write | 1923 | 660 -66% | 1135 -41% | 947 -51% | 618 -68% | 388 -80% | 2242 ? 17% |
Score Total | 4037 | 1822 -55% | 2235 -45% | 2474 -39% | 1448 -64% | 2583 -36% | 4726 ? 17% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1812 | 1962 8% | 1636 -10% | 1212 -33% | 764 -58% | 1293 -29% | 2041 ? 13% |
Copy Program MB/s | 528 | 522 -1% | 698 32% | 374.3 -29% | 465.8 -12% | 560 6% | 552 ? 5% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1134 | 1258 11% | 1246 10% | 829 -27% | 764 -33% | 927 -18% | 1183 ? 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-30% | -30% /
-35% | -45% /
-50% | -52% /
-64% | -153% /
-190% | -8% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 iGPU now has 96 instead of 80 EUs and potentially slightly higher clock rates. You can definitely play games with this iGPU but rather at medium resolutions and details. Other graphics tasks like photo or video-editing are handled well by the graphics unit.
In the 3DMark tests, the card places itself ahead of the competition and is about 5% faster than the average model. It's about 10% to 12% superior compared with its sibling configuration. The AMD RX Vega 7 in the Ryzen 7 4700U is about 30% to 40% behind.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7273, n=154) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average of class Convertible (471 - 18102, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38040, n=141) | |
Average of class Convertible (2965 - 74205, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 5955, n=166) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average of class Convertible (365 - 13081, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=163) | |
Average of class Convertible (94 - 5081, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7256 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18932 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4752 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1667 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
The Witcher 3 sometimes even runs in Full HD but only with low details. Otherwise, performance is rather sufficient for medium resolutions and details. Compared with the competition, the Yoga 9i takes the top position again. The average Iris Xe G7 is outperformed by 10% at least (The Witcher 3), the sibling configuration is 5% to 10% behind, and the competition with last-gen iGPUs is even further behind. The differences seen in The Witcher 3 are slightly higher than in the 3DMark tests and other titles.
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (36 - 148, n=166) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (15.5 - 134.8, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
1366x768 med (1/3) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (31.6 - 108.5, n=166) | |
Average of class Convertible (6.9 - 122.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.2 - 88.1, n=166) | |
Average of class Convertible (5.5 - 117.9, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.6 - 78.5, n=166) | |
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 114.1, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=167) | |
Average of class Convertible (5.01 - 125.7, n=76, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=168) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (3.46 - 105.9, n=78, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14ITL5 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.1 - 59.8, n=167) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average of class Convertible (3.09 - 88.1, n=75, last 2 years) |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (46 - 85.5, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (35.1 - 49, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (19.9 - 28.2, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (16.4 - 22.7, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (29 - 63, n=19) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
1920x1080 Lowest Preset | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (33 - 45.4, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11 - 31, n=19) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 ITL 4K | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (12 - 25, n=13) |
Gaming performance is relatively stable and only drops minimally over a period of more than an hour (from 15 fps to 13-14 fps). The Y9i 4K passes the Fire Strike stress test with 99%.