Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Can the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE impress Samsung fans? We think so. For $499 to $649, Samsung delivers a device with a high-quality aluminium chassis, pen support, a good range of accessories and a very long update timeline.
The screen impresses with good colours, and connectivity now includes WiFi 6E, although this does not result in a very noticeable increase in speed. A 5G-enabled model is also available and can also be used as a GPS device in cars.
The tablet also offers decent cameras, more powerful storage than its predecessor and barely noticeable temperature development. The speakers are great and the battery lasts quite a long time, too.
Taken on its own, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE is a decent option, but one look at the competition quickly paints a different picture: even the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, which is available for less than $400, offers noticeably better performance.
We never thought we'd be naming Apple as the winner in terms of value for money, but an iPad Air 11 costs only slightly more than the Galaxy Tab S10 FE and is in a completely different league in terms of performance. It also comes with a pen with Bluetooth features and significantly more premium specs.
Given the extremely high prices for the Galaxy Tab S10+ and Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, the Tab S10 FE may seem inexpensive within Samsung's portfolio, but you will have to put up with significant cost-cutting measures in return. And if you check out the competition, there are significantly better deals available.
Thanks to Samsung's long update pledges, the Galaxy Tab S9 FE is also a strong competitor and is already available for a significantly lower price.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
Our test unit was provided by notebooksbilliger.de.
The 5G version with 128 GB of storage is available for $550 on Amazon.com. The WiFi model with 256 GB of storage is selling for $570 on Amazon. To save $70, you can also choose the 128 GB version, which is currently available for $499.
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
- Specifications
- Case – Modern metal chassis without frills
- Features – Only USB 2.0 for the Galaxy Tab S10 FE
- Software – OneUI with a range of preinstalled apps
- Communication and GNSS – Now featuring 6-GHz WiFi
- Phone features and voice quality – The tablet can make calls
- Cameras – Decent tablet photos
- Accessories and warranty – Keyboard cover available
- Input devices and operation – Fingerprint sensor included
- Display – Tab S10 FE with an IPS display and no PWM
- Performance – There should be more to it than that
- Games – More of a mid-range offering
- Emissions – Cool as a cucumber
- Battery life – A slow charger
- Notebookcheck overall rating
- Possible alternatives compared
Samsung now issues "Fan Editions" of high-end Samsung devices for smartphones, headphones and tablets. The aim is also to make high-quality devices available to people with smaller budgets.
The compromises that came with these devices in the past were usually acceptable. The only thing that doesn't really go down well with fans is that Samsung often uses its own Exynos SoCs.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is the most affordable tablet in Samsung's Tab S10 family and was designed to bridge the gap between mid-range and high-end.
The following models are available:
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage: $499
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 12 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: $569
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage: $552
Prices have increased significantly compared to the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE. For this review, we tested a European 5G model, which is also available with 256 GB of storage.
Specifications
Case – Modern metal chassis without frills
The chassis is milled from a single piece of aluminium. The tablet has a very clean finish and the material transitions are barely noticeable. The only design details on the back are the shiny Samsung logo in the upper left corner and the colour-contrasting printed antennas. Overall, it has a modern look without any frills.
Samsung offers its tablet in either dark grey or silver. A subtle blue colour variant is supposed to be available exclusively in Samsung's online store, but it also seems to be available from other online retailers.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is very sturdy and only creaks softly when you try to flex it. Even when pressed harder, there is hardly any visible distortion in the liquid crystal display.
At around 500 grams, it weighs about the same as similar tablets and is significantly lighter than its predecessor. Samsung has also slimmed its tablet down to just 6 millimeters, putting it on par with the iPad Air.
Conveniently, the tablet is IP68-rated for water and dust resistance, so it can be used in harsher environments.
Features – Only USB 2.0 for the Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Unlike the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra or Tab S10+, the Tab S10 FE only has one USB 2.0 port, making it impossible to connect a monitor via cable. Samsung's in-house solution for a desktop environment, DeX, is being discontinued. Instead, you can use Miracast for wireless screen mirroring or Link to Windows.
There is a docking port with three pogo pins along the bottom edge for connecting a keyboard cover. Unfortunately, NFC is not included on the Galaxy Tab S10 FE.
Our 5G model supports eSIM but also has a nano-SIM slot so you can use dual SIM.
microSD Card Reader
We tested the card reader with our reference microSD card, Angelbird V60. Like its predecessor, the tablet transfers data to and from the microSD card pretty quickly, so you can use it to store files as needed.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Software – OneUI with a range of preinstalled apps
The tablet runs on Android 15 and also features Samsung's own user interface OneUI 7. The security patches were dated April 2025 at the time of testing, making them very current. Samsung promises to offer software updates for 7 years, quarterly at first, then every six months.
Several third-party apps come preinstalled which may annoy some. Some of Samsung's own apps, such as the gallery, aren't that easy to remove either, should you wish to use an alternative.
Sustainability
The tablet produces 124.9 kg of CO2 equivalents during production and use. That is fairly high for a tablet. And while Samsung claims to upcycle discarded fishing nets to plastic parts for devices starting with the Samsung Galaxy S24, this cannot be specifically verified for a particular device. There is no further information on the materials used in the test unit, nor on the share of recycled materials.
Samsung offers a lot of help for repairing minor problems yourself on its website. You can also buy replacement parts and download repair manuals for some devices. At the time of testing, this was not yet possible for the Galaxy Tab S10 FE in Germany, but since all other current Samsung devices are already listed, we assume that it should soon be available.
Communication and GNSS – Now featuring 6-GHz WiFi
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE now also supports WiFi 6E, giving users access to the lesser-used 6-GHz band.
The speeds we measured in our test with our reference router, Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000, are rather low compared to the rest of the field and were between 540 and 770 MBit/s. This is not quite enough to fully utilize a gigabit internet connection, but at least the transfers are fairly stable.
Our 5G model supports sufficient 5G and 4G frequencies to usually allow the tablet to connect to the mobile network when traveling. Still, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE cannot be considered a fully global device.
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Tablet | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Outdoors, the device located us with an accuracy of up to 3 meters after a short wait. However, the number of satellites with which the tablet communicates is relatively small.
For our location test, we took the Tab S10 FE on a bike ride through the city. We also brought along the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch with fairly accurate location tracking.
Our test device performed well, only occasionally locating us a meter away from the road. Even in narrow old town streets, the location remained relatively accurate.
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE can be used for navigation if you don't need pinpoint accuracy in every situation.
Phone features and voice quality – The tablet can make calls
The tablet can also be used to make phone calls: via the loudspeaker and built-in microphones or via a connected headset.
The call quality is good and the person on the other end can hear us very clearly.
Cameras – Decent tablet photos
The camera is less important on tablets such as the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE as it is on smartphones. Samsung has chosen a 13-megapixel sensor as the main camera, which takes decent photos at first glance. Zooming in reveals that details appear rather blurry and out of focus.
In conditions with low light and high contrast, the dynamic range suffers somewhat, especially in dark areas. The test lab revealed a subtle decrease in sharpness toward the edges and slightly oversaturated colors.
Videos can be recorded in 4K with the main camera but only at 30 fps. The autofocus occasionally glitches, but overall the image quality is good.
There is also a 12-megapixel selfie camera on the front. It takes usable pictures with slightly reduced contrast but decent sharpness.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light

Accessories and warranty – Keyboard cover available
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE comes with a pen that doesn't support a Bluetooth connection to the device. Some apps are programmed to be used with the pen, including notes or the drawing app.
The device does not come with a charger but includes a USB cable and a SIM tool.
Several keyboard covers are available from the Samsung online store. They are the same ones as for the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. The normal keyboard cover is available for $200 and also includes a touchpad. It comes in black or white. The slim version is only available in black and costs $140. It does not include a touchpad.
If you just want a book cover to protect your tablet, it will cost you $90 directly from Samsung; a replacement pen costs $55.
Various care and warranty packages can be purchased on the Samsung website.
Input devices and operation – Fingerprint sensor included
The touchscreen on the 90-Hz display of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE responds to input quickly and precisely. When holding the tablet in your hand, however, you need to make sure that the palm of your hand is not resting directly on the display. The device did not always recognize unwanted inputs correctly.
The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the standby button. This is located along the upper long side of the tablet. Once fingerprints have been registered, they are recognized very reliably and the screen is unlocked directly from standby mode. However, you should register at least two fingers for use in landscape and portrait mode, as the sensor may not be easily accessible depending on its position.
Alternatively, you can use 2D facial recognition via the front camera. As this does not use a depth sensor like the iPad, it is not recognized by Android as an authentication method for sensitive apps such as banking.
Display – Tab S10 FE with an IPS display and no PWM
Like most tablets in this price range, the Samsung Galaxy S10 FE does not feature an OLED display. The IPS screen has a maximum brightness of 667 cd/m², which is good for everyday use. The low black value also makes for strong contrasts.
The resolution is on par with that of the predecessor at 2304 x 1440 pixels. Competitors such as the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro feature more detailed resolutions.
We were pleased to note that the display does not use PWM at lower brightness levels, making it suitable for sensitive users.
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 663 cd/m²
Contrast: 1700:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9" | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Honor Pad V9 IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5" | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -33% | -7% | -241% | -15% | |
Brightness middle | 663 | 694 5% | 508 -23% | 543 -18% | 776 17% |
Brightness | 617 | 695 13% | 497 -19% | 501 -19% | 750 22% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 88 5% | 93 11% | 89 6% | 91 8% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.66 -69% | 0.5 -28% | 0.62 -59% | 0.58 -49% |
Contrast | 1700 | 1052 -38% | 1016 -40% | 876 -48% | 1338 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.47 | 2.1 -43% | 1.13 23% | 12.4 -744% | 1.6 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.14 | 4.3 -4% | 2.49 40% | 15.9 -284% | 4.5 -9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.3 -136% | 1.7 -21% | 12.1 -764% | 2.5 -79% |
Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.173 101% | 0.58 379% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6730 97% | 7010 93% | 6747 96% | 6175 105% | 6892 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Analysis using CalMAN software in “Natural” screen colour mode revealed very accurate colour reproduction with only minor deviations from the target colour space which are barely noticeable to the naked eye.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 4.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.6 ms rise | |
↘ 25.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Performance – There should be more to it than that
We have said it before: The Samsung Exynos SoCs aren't really a "fan favourite", especially on the more expensive Samsung devices. This is because they often offer lower performance than comparable SoCs from Qualcomm or Snapdragon and have had to deal with significant temperature increases in the past.
The Galaxy Tab S10 FE features the Samsung Exynos 1580. The SoC is also used in the bestselling Samsung Galaxy A56 5G smartphone, so it promises mid-range power rather than luxury feel.
Indeed, the much more affordable Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro turns out to be far superior in terms of performance. The Galaxy tablet has to settle for a middle-of-the-road ranking among the devices tested.
Everyday performance is good enough for smooth operation, though, and many apps also run smoothly. More demanding users who want to use the device for cutting or working with large image files will see a noticeable difference compared to more powerful tablets, with slightly delayed processes and occasional lagging.
CrossMark - Overall | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (1036 - 1052, n=2) | |
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
Honor Pad V9 |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (10741 - 11181, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Tablet (268 - 499, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Tablet (270 - 497, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1) | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Average of class Tablet (634 - 1133, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1) |
Things get even worse when it comes to graphics performance, where the Tab S10 FE is often slower than all comparable devices from other manufacturers, even those that are significantly cheaper.
The rendering performance in 4K is too low for smooth display, and this also applies to complex graphics in the screen's native resolution. At 1080p, the performance is usually sufficient for smooth playback.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
When browsing the internet, our test device ranked in the middle of the comparison field. Websites load quickly and images are available after minimal delays when scrolling.
4K videos on YouTube play smoothly.
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (169.9 - 173.1, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (191 - 194, n=2) | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (12 - 12.3, n=2) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (138 - 138, n=2) | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (50719 - 50864, n=2) | |
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119) | |
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (791 - 793, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung has upgraded the storage compared to its predecessor and now uses UFS 3.1 storage, which enables significantly faster access and shorter waits. When compared to its Android competitors, however, Samsung is not at the forefront in terms of storage speed.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | Honor Pad V9 | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | 52% | 101% | 20% | -14% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1602.8 | 526.65 -67% | 1921.68 20% | 3849.52 140% | 1728 ? 8% | 1253 ? -22% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1271.5 | 282.47 -78% | 1767.43 39% | 3283.91 158% | 1155 ? -9% | 882 ? -31% |
Random Read 4KB | 225.1 | 225.02 0% | 343.96 53% | 302.34 34% | 285 ? 27% | 206 ? -8% |
Random Write 4KB | 204.2 | 68.78 -66% | 396.64 94% | 346.85 70% | 316 ? 55% | 212 ? 4% |
Games – More of a mid-range offering
When gaming, you don't really feel like you're playing on a high-end device. Although we achieved 60 fps in Genshin Impact with high settings, visible and perceptible stuttering during battles and fast movements are a problem.
In PUBG Mobile, you have to settle for 30 fps even with minimal settings, but these are quite stable. We tested the frame rates with GameBench, as always.
Emissions – Cool as a cucumber
Temperature
Did we say that Exynos chips often have a problem with overheating? Well, temperature control is easier with a large tablet and the Galaxy Tab S10 FE manages to stay cool even after long periods under load: We measured a maximum surface temperature of 40.3 °C.
Throttling is no problem either, as the 3DMark stress tests show. Instead, they reveal something else: The graphics unit doesn't support some of the more modern features such as Ray Tracing, which means that the 3DMark Solar Bay cannot be executed, despite working on all comparison devices (except for the predecessor).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Honor Pad V9 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 |
Speakers
Samsung's Galaxy Tab S10 FE comes with two speakers. They can achieve a decent volume, though other tablets are even more powerful. The sound is balanced and enjoyable - even at high volumes, nothing is distorted and the sound remains clear.
However, as is often the case with Samsung, the lack of Bluetooth codecs is annoying. This means that you'll need to check whether your headphones or speakers can connect wirelessly in good quality before buying.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life – A slow charger
Energy consumption
Samsung seems to have a good grip on the Galaxy Tab S10 FE's energy demand. That said, the model also offers significantly lower performance than some other tablets, so it's important to take this into account, especially when evaluating the load values.
The tablet can be charged with a maximum of 25 watts; no charger is included with the tablet.
Even when using chargers with the appropriate power output, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE did not always charge at full speed in our test lab. It appears that chargers have to support USB Power Delivery in order to enable fast charging. Even then, it takes almost 3 hours to fully charge the device.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 1580 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -73% | -52% | -70% | 1% | 2% | -43% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 1.13 46% | 1.6 24% | 1.26 40% | 0.75 64% | 1.41 ? 33% | 1.766 ? 16% |
Idle Average * | 2.5 | 4.81 -92% | 2.8 -12% | 5.57 -123% | 1.5 40% | 1.975 ? 21% | 3.76 ? -50% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 4.89 -69% | 4.7 -62% | 5.61 -93% | 1.56 46% | 2.2 ? 24% | 4.25 ? -47% |
Load Average * | 5.8 | 15.02 -159% | 11.4 -97% | 12 -107% | 7.92 -37% | 7.74 ? -33% | 9.51 ? -64% |
Load Maximum * | 7.9 | 15.22 -93% | 16.8 -113% | 13.36 -69% | 16.5 -109% | 10.6 ? -34% | 13.3 ? -68% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Battery life
The 8000-mAh battery managed to keep the tablet going for 14:47 hours in our practical WiFi test. This should get you through a day on the couch, but if you use your tablet regularly you might need to recharge it every night.
Under load, the battery lasts about 4 hours.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | -12% | 21% | 19% | |
Reader / Idle | 1489 | 1534 3% | |||
H.264 | 967 | 773 -20% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 887 | 872 -2% | 703 -21% | 1074 21% | 1054 19% |
Load | 246 | 224 -9% |
Notebookcheck overall rating

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is a lot cheaper than its high-end colleagues, but it cuts quite a lot of corners in terms of performance.
This is particularly problematic given the strong competition and even Apple's offering in this price range with the iPad Air.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
- 04/28/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $552.54 List Price: 779€ | 497 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ , 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $16.55 2 Pack Galaxy Tab S9 FE S Pe... 2. $21.08 Keyboard Case for Samsung Ga... 3. $29.99 Dexnor Case for Samsung Gala... List Price: 529€ | 524 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI TFT-LCD | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: $529.00 List Price: 699€ | 460 g | 128 GB NVMe | 10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS | |
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 500€ | 475 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 450€ | 500 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.