Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Is it NFL material or did it peak in high school? Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Review

Doing without takes practice.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is much cheaper than any other Tab S model. It doesn't have an OLED screen and also cuts some corners in terms of performance. Find out if Samsung's pared-down tablet is still worthwhile here.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Katherine Bodner) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
ARM 5G Android Samsung Tablet

Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Can the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE impress Samsung fans? We think so. For $499 to $649, Samsung delivers a device with a high-quality aluminium chassis, pen support, a good range of accessories and a very long update timeline. 

The screen impresses with good colours, and connectivity now includes WiFi 6E, although this does not result in a very noticeable increase in speed. A 5G-enabled model is also available and can also be used as a GPS device in cars.

The tablet also offers decent cameras, more powerful storage than its predecessor and barely noticeable temperature development. The speakers are great and the battery lasts quite a long time, too.

Taken on its own, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE is a decent option, but one look at the competition quickly paints a different picture: even the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, which is available for less than $400, offers noticeably better performance.

We never thought we'd be naming Apple as the winner in terms of value for money, but an iPad Air 11 costs only slightly more than the Galaxy Tab S10 FE and is in a completely different league in terms of performance. It also comes with a pen with Bluetooth features and significantly more premium specs.

Given the extremely high prices for the Galaxy Tab S10+ and Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, the Tab S10 FE may seem inexpensive within Samsung's portfolio, but you will have to put up with significant cost-cutting measures in return. And if you check out the competition, there are significantly better deals available.

Thanks to Samsung's long update pledges, the Galaxy Tab S9 FE is also a strong competitor and is already available for a significantly lower price.

Pros

+ modern, well-made aluminium body
+ balanced sound from the speakers
+ IP68 certification
+ WiFi 6E and 5G available
+ colour-accurate display
+ no PWM
+ software updates promised for 7 years
+ comprehensive range of accessories
+ comes with a pen

Cons

- below-average performance
- slow charging
- limited number of Bluetooth codecs
- no Ray Tracing
- sustainability information lacking
- only USB 2.0, no NFC
- stutters when playing games
- pen doesn't support Bluetooth

Price and availability

Our test unit was provided by notebooksbilliger.de. 

The 5G version with 128 GB of storage is available for $550 on Amazon.com. The WiFi model with 256 GB of storage is selling for $570 on Amazon. To save $70, you can also choose the 128 GB version, which is currently available for $499.

Amazon Logo
$552.54
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 10.9”128 GB,Android Tablet,(AT&T Network),IP68 Water & Dust-Resistant,Long Battery Life,Powerful Processor,S Pen, 13MP Camera,Lightweight Design,US Version, 2025,Gray

Samsung now issues "Fan Editions" of high-end Samsung devices for smartphones, headphones and tablets. The aim is also to make high-quality devices available to people with smaller budgets.

The compromises that came with these devices in the past were usually acceptable. The only thing that doesn't really go down well with fans is that Samsung often uses its own Exynos SoCs.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is the most affordable tablet in Samsung's Tab S10 family and was designed to bridge the gap between mid-range and high-end.

The following models are available:

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage: $499
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 12 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: $569
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 8 GB RAM / 128 GB storage: $552

Prices have increased significantly compared to the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE. For this review, we tested a European 5G model, which is also available with 256 GB of storage.

Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1580 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
10.90 inch 16:10, 2304 x 1440 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 2 TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: compass, acceleration, hall, orientation
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B66), UMTS (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), GSM (B2/​B3/​B5/​B8), LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 254.3 x 165.8 ( = 0.24 x 10.01 x 6.53 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix video@ UHD 4K (3.840 x 2.160 Pixel), 30fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, pen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
497 g ( = 17.53 oz / 1.1 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
779 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Modern metal chassis without frills

The chassis is milled from a single piece of aluminium. The tablet has a very clean finish and the material transitions are barely noticeable. The only design details on the back are the shiny Samsung logo in the upper left corner and the colour-contrasting printed antennas. Overall, it has a modern look without any frills.

Samsung offers its tablet in either dark grey or silver. A subtle blue colour variant is supposed to be available exclusively in Samsung's online store, but it also seems to be available from other online retailers.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is very sturdy and only creaks softly when you try to flex it. Even when pressed harder, there is hardly any visible distortion in the liquid crystal display.

At around 500 grams, it weighs about the same as similar tablets and is significantly lighter than its predecessor. Samsung has also slimmed its tablet down to just 6 millimeters, putting it on par with the iPad Air.

Conveniently, the tablet is IP68-rated for water and dust resistance, so it can be used in harsher environments.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G

Size comparison

259.1 mm / 10.2 in 176.1 mm / 6.93 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 475 g1.047 lbs254.3 mm / 10 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 524 g1.155 lbs254.3 mm / 10 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 6 mm / 0.2362 in 497 g1.096 lbs251.22 mm / 9.89 in 173.42 mm / 6.83 in 6.18 mm / 0.2433 in 500 g1.102 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 in 178.5 mm / 7.03 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 460 g1.014 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features – Only USB 2.0 for the Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Unlike the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra or Tab S10+, the Tab S10 FE only has one USB 2.0 port, making it impossible to connect a monitor via cable. Samsung's in-house solution for a desktop environment, DeX, is being discontinued. Instead, you can use Miracast for wireless screen mirroring or Link to Windows.

There is a docking port with three pogo pins along the bottom edge for connecting a keyboard cover. Unfortunately, NFC is not included on the Galaxy Tab S10 FE.

Our 5G model supports eSIM but also has a nano-SIM slot so you can use dual SIM.

Right: USB-C port, speaker
Right: USB-C port, speaker
Left: speaker, microphone, SIM slot
Left: speaker, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: docking port
Bottom: docking port
Top: 2x microphones, volume control, standby button
Top: 2x microphones, volume control, standby button

microSD Card Reader

We tested the card reader with our reference microSD card, Angelbird V60. Like its predecessor, the tablet transfers data to and from the microSD card pretty quickly, so you can use it to store files as needed.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.36 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird V60)
57.4 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years)
34.8 MB/s -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (28.6-51.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø85.1 (61.1-113.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)

Software – OneUI with a range of preinstalled apps

The tablet runs on Android 15 and also features Samsung's own user interface OneUI 7. The security patches were dated April 2025 at the time of testing, making them very current. Samsung promises to offer software updates for 7 years, quarterly at first, then every six months.

Several third-party apps come preinstalled which may annoy some. Some of Samsung's own apps, such as the gallery, aren't that easy to remove either, should you wish to use an alternative.

Software Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Software Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Software Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Sustainability

The tablet produces 124.9 kg of CO2 equivalents during production and use. That is fairly high for a tablet. And while Samsung claims to upcycle discarded fishing nets to plastic parts for devices starting with the Samsung Galaxy S24, this cannot be specifically verified for a particular device. There is no further information on the materials used in the test unit, nor on the share of recycled materials. 

Samsung offers a lot of help for repairing minor problems yourself on its website. You can also buy replacement parts and download repair manuals for some devices. At the time of testing, this was not yet possible for the Galaxy Tab S10 FE in Germany, but since all other current Samsung devices are already listed, we assume that it should soon be available.

Communication and GNSS – Now featuring 6-GHz WiFi

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE now also supports WiFi 6E, giving users access to the lesser-used 6-GHz band.

The speeds we measured in our test with our reference router, Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000, are rather low compared to the rest of the field and were between 540 and 770 MBit/s. This is not quite enough to fully utilize a gigabit internet connection, but at least the transfers are fairly stable.

Our 5G model supports sufficient 5G and 4G frequencies to usually allow the tablet to connect to the mobile network when traveling. Still, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE cannot be considered a fully global device.

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
795 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
847 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼63%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Pad V9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1051 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1336 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼67%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
943 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1400 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1344 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
550 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
541 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1253 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼94%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø642 (539-697)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø746 (680-772)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellites
Available satellites

Outdoors, the device located us with an accuracy of up to 3 meters after a short wait. However, the number of satellites with which the tablet communicates is relatively small.

For our location test, we took the Tab S10 FE on a bike ride through the city. We also brought along the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch with fairly accurate location tracking.

Our test device performed well, only occasionally locating us a meter away from the road. Even in narrow old town streets, the location remained relatively accurate.

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE can be used for navigation if you don't need pinpoint accuracy in every situation.

GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – overview
GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – overview
GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – turn
GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – turn
GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – bridge
GPS location Samsung Galaxy S10 FE – bridge
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – overview
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – overview
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – turn
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – turn
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – bridge
GPS location Garmin Venu 2 – bridge

Phone features and voice quality – The tablet can make calls

The tablet can also be used to make phone calls: via the loudspeaker and built-in microphones or via a connected headset.

The call quality is good and the person on the other end can hear us very clearly.

Cameras – Decent tablet photos

Picture taken with front camera
Picture taken with front camera

The camera is less important on tablets such as the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE as it is on smartphones. Samsung has chosen a 13-megapixel sensor as the main camera, which takes decent photos at first glance. Zooming in reveals that details appear rather blurry and out of focus.

In conditions with low light and high contrast, the dynamic range suffers somewhat, especially in dark areas. The test lab revealed a subtle decrease in sharpness toward the edges and slightly oversaturated colors.

Videos can be recorded in 4K with the main camera but only at 30 fps. The autofocus occasionally glitches, but overall the image quality is good.

There is also a 12-megapixel selfie camera on the front. It takes usable pictures with slightly reduced contrast but decent sharpness.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
ColorChecker
7.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: 7.31 ∆E min: 2.64 - max: 14.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: 47.54 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.34 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – Keyboard cover available

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE comes with a pen that doesn't support a Bluetooth connection to the device. Some apps are programmed to be used with the pen, including notes or the drawing app.

The device does not come with a charger but includes a USB cable and a SIM tool.

Several keyboard covers are available from the Samsung online store. They are the same ones as for the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. The normal keyboard cover is available for $200 and also includes a touchpad. It comes in black or white. The slim version is only available in black and costs $140. It does not include a touchpad.

If you just want a book cover to protect your tablet, it will cost you $90 directly from Samsung; a replacement pen costs $55.

Various care and warranty packages can be purchased on the Samsung website. 

Input devices and operation – Fingerprint sensor included

The touchscreen on the 90-Hz display of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE responds to input quickly and precisely. When holding the tablet in your hand, however, you need to make sure that the palm of your hand is not resting directly on the display. The device did not always recognize unwanted inputs correctly.

The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the standby button. This is located along the upper long side of the tablet. Once fingerprints have been registered, they are recognized very reliably and the screen is unlocked directly from standby mode. However, you should register at least two fingers for use in landscape and portrait mode, as the sensor may not be easily accessible depending on its position.

Alternatively, you can use 2D facial recognition via the front camera. As this does not use a depth sensor like the iPad, it is not recognized by Android as an authentication method for sensitive apps such as banking.

Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode

Display – Tab S10 FE with an IPS display and no PWM

Subpixel resolution
Subpixel resolution

Like most tablets in this price range, the Samsung Galaxy S10 FE does not feature an OLED display. The IPS screen has a maximum brightness of 667 cd/m², which is good for everyday use. The low black value also makes for strong contrasts.

The resolution is on par with that of the predecessor at 2304 x 1440 pixels. Competitors such as the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro feature more detailed resolutions.

We were pleased to note that the display does not use PWM at lower brightness levels, making it suitable for sensitive users.

654
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 663 cd/m²
Contrast: 1700:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Honor Pad V9
IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5"
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen
-33%
-7%
-241%
-15%
Brightness middle
663
694
5%
508
-23%
543
-18%
776
17%
Brightness
617
695
13%
497
-19%
501
-19%
750
22%
Brightness Distribution
84
88
5%
93
11%
89
6%
91
8%
Black Level *
0.39
0.66
-69%
0.5
-28%
0.62
-59%
0.58
-49%
Contrast
1700
1052
-38%
1016
-40%
876
-48%
1338
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
2.1
-43%
1.13
23%
12.4
-744%
1.6
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.14
4.3
-4%
2.49
40%
15.9
-284%
4.5
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
3.3
-136%
1.7
-21%
12.1
-764%
2.5
-79%
Gamma
2.199 100%
2.26 97%
2.173 101%
0.58 379%
2.23 99%
CCT
6730 97%
7010 93%
6747 96%
6175 105%
6892 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Analysis using CalMAN software in “Natural” screen colour mode revealed very accurate colour reproduction with only minor deviations from the target colour space which are barely noticeable to the naked eye.

CalMAN greyscales
CalMAN greyscales
CalMAN colour accuracy
CalMAN colour accuracy
CalMAN sRGB colour space
CalMAN sRGB colour space
CalMAN AdobeRGB colour space
CalMAN AdobeRGB colour space
CalMAN DCI P3 colour space
CalMAN DCI P3 colour space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 4.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 25.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

The maximum brightness is sufficient for outdoor use on cloudy days, but on sunny days you should at least move into the shade. 

Thanks to IPS technology, the display offers a very wide viewing angle, which is excellent.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – There should be more to it than that

We have said it before: The Samsung Exynos SoCs aren't really a "fan favourite", especially on the more expensive Samsung devices. This is because they often offer lower performance than comparable SoCs from Qualcomm or Snapdragon and have had to deal with significant temperature increases in the past.

The Galaxy Tab S10 FE features the Samsung Exynos 1580. The SoC is also used in the bestselling Samsung Galaxy A56 5G smartphone, so it promises mid-range power rather than luxury feel.

Indeed, the much more affordable Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro turns out to be far superior in terms of performance. The Galaxy tablet has to settle for a middle-of-the-road ranking among the devices tested.

Everyday performance is good enough for smooth operation, though, and many apps also run smoothly. More demanding users who want to use the device for cutting or working with large image files will see a noticeable difference compared to more powerful tablets, with slightly delayed processes and occasional lagging.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
3019 Points +121%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (1367 - 1380, n=2)
1374 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1367 Points
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1359 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=87, last 2 years)
1197 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
1011 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11773 Points +200%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points +31%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4119 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
3921 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (3890 - 3921, n=2)
3906 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=87, last 2 years)
3844 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
2858 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2045290 Points +129%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1133809 Points +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (894364 - 901303, n=2)
897834 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
894364 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=52, last 2 years)
877394 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
573936 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
17996 Points +35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (13344 - 14298, n=2)
13821 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
13344 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
11259 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=77, last 2 years)
10752 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1052 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (1036 - 1052, n=2)
1044 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years)
825 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
673 Points -36%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points +47%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8279 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
6058 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
6058 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=62, last 2 years)
4653 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
4424 Points -27%
System
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11001 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10013 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
10013 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
9016 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=62, last 2 years)
7702 Points -23%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points +71%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
9693 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
7554 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
7554 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=62, last 2 years)
5409 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
4486 Points -41%
Graphics
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
28497 Points +177%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points +140%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=62, last 2 years)
10818 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10293 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
10293 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
7031 Points -32%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1730 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
1730 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1546 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
1347 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=62, last 2 years)
1336 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
58543 Points +445%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=61, last 2 years)
12008 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (10741 - 11181, n=2)
10961 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10741 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
6110 Points -43%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet
  (268 - 499, n=2, last 2 years)
384 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
268 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
268 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet
  (270 - 497, n=2, last 2 years)
384 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
270 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
270 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet
  (634 - 1133, n=2, last 2 years)
884 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
634 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
634 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)
1944 Points
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1148 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points +1129%
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=10, last 2 years)
1774 Points +491%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1070 Points +257%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
300 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
  (n=1)
300 Points 0%

Things get even worse when it comes to graphics performance, where the Tab S10 FE is often slower than all comparable devices from other manufacturers, even those that are significantly cheaper.

The rendering performance in 4K is too low for smooth display, and this also applies to complex graphics in the screen's native resolution. At 1080p, the performance is usually sufficient for smooth playback.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5611 Points +277%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points +102%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2594 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1488 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5190 Points +242%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points +111%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2649 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points +133%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9759 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5184 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2987 Points -42%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2088 Points +208%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points +61%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2572 Points +270%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1137 Points +63%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
696 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps -8%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -33%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
592 fps +287%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps +193%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
375 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -15%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
450 fps +313%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps +145%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +11%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
238 fps +194%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps +126%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +88%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
159 fps +246%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +137%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +140%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
64.2 fps +192%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +141%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +62%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps +292%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps +174%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -34%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
35.2 fps +263%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +147%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -38%

When browsing the internet, our test device ranked in the middle of the comparison field. Websites load quickly and images are available after minimal delays when scrolling.

4K videos on YouTube play smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
303.591 Points +79%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=9, last 2 years)
245 Points +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (169.9 - 173.1, n=2)
171.5 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
169.88 Points
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
151.997 Points -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
548 runs/min +182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
194 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (191 - 194, n=2)
192.5 runs/min -1%
Honor Pad V9
192 runs/min -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=66, last 2 years)
154.9 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
80.1 runs/min -59%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
34.4 runs/min +180%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=43, last 2 years)
13.7 runs/min +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min 0%
Honor Pad V9
12.3 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
12.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (12 - 12.3, n=2)
12.2 runs/min -1%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points +12%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
148 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
138 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (138 - 138, n=2)
138 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=72, last 2 years)
118.1 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
107 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
92645 Points +82%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
50864 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (50719 - 50864, n=2)
50792 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
49086 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=95, last 2 years)
34743 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
34739 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=81, last 2 years)
3306 ms * -318%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
1208.7 ms * -53%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
847.4 ms * -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (791 - 793, n=2)
792 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
790.8 ms *
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * +17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
329.7 ms * +58%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung has upgraded the storage compared to its predecessor and now uses UFS 3.1 storage, which enables significantly faster access and shorter waits. When compared to its Android competitors, however, Samsung is not at the forefront in terms of storage speed.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEHonor Pad V9Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-53%
52%
101%
20%
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
1602.8
526.65
-67%
1921.68
20%
3849.52
140%
Sequential Write 256KB
1271.5
282.47
-78%
1767.43
39%
3283.91
158%
Random Read 4KB
225.1
225.02
0%
343.96
53%
302.34
34%
Random Write 4KB
204.2
68.78
-66%
396.64
94%
346.85
70%

Games – More of a mid-range offering

When gaming, you don't really feel like you're playing on a high-end device. Although we achieved 60 fps in Genshin Impact with high settings, visible and perceptible stuttering during battles and fast movements are a problem.

In PUBG Mobile, you have to settle for 30 fps even with minimal settings, but these are quite stable. We tested the frame rates with GameBench, as always.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø57 (38-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø57.5 (16-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.7 (27-31)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.6 (26-31)

Emissions – Cool as a cucumber

Temperature

Did we say that Exynos chips often have a problem with overheating? Well, temperature control is easier with a large tablet and the Galaxy Tab S10 FE manages to stay cool even after long periods under load: We measured a maximum surface temperature of 40.3 °C.

Throttling is no problem either, as the 3DMark stress tests show. Instead, they reveal something else: The graphics unit doesn't support some of the more modern features such as Ray Tracing, which means that the 3DMark Solar Bay cannot be executed, despite working on all comparison devices (except for the predecessor). 

Max. Load
 32 °C
90 F
29 °C
84 F
28 °C
82 F
 
 40.3 °C
105 F
33 °C
91 F
28.1 °C
83 F
 
 39.9 °C
104 F
32.7 °C
91 F
28.2 °C
83 F
 
Maximum: 40.3 °C = 105 F
Average: 32.4 °C = 90 F
28.6 °C
83 F
28.8 °C
84 F
30.9 °C
88 F
29.3 °C
85 F
29.5 °C
85 F
31.5 °C
89 F
29.3 °C
85 F
30.8 °C
87 F
39 °C
102 F
Maximum: 39 °C = 102 F
Average: 30.9 °C = 88 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % -10%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.7 % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % -8%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.7 % -13%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
76.4 % -22%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 %
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81.3 %
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
81.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % -2%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 % -10%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
80 % -19%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.98 (8.89-9.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.3 (21.8-28.5)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.4 (13.9-16.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.8 (31.6-32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.5 (49.2-56.2)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.6 (48.5-58.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø5.01 (4.99-5.03)
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.4 (10.5-13.1)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.35 (7.17-8.06)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back

Speakers

Available Bluetooth audio codecs
Available Bluetooth audio codecs

Samsung's Galaxy Tab S10 FE comes with two speakers. They can achieve a decent volume, though other tablets are even more powerful. The sound is balanced and enjoyable - even at high volumes, nothing is distorted and the sound remains clear.

However, as is often the case with Samsung, the lack of Bluetooth codecs is annoying. This means that you'll need to check whether your headphones or speakers can connect wirelessly in good quality before buying.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204643.62539.138.33133.237.34037.836.55040.139.76325.529.48016.535.910017.744.812519.551.616017.457.220015.86225016.36431514.767.54001363.45001767.963020.669.18002167.8100018.874.2125017.178.8160015.878.320001475.9250012.473.5315012.271.2400012.569500012.165.6630012.464.7800012.273.21000012.271.21250012.164.41600011.762.7SPL27.885.6N0.963.5median 14.7median 67.8Delta2.74.23340.227.530.322.831.626.331.836.440.921.130.720.738.519.643.812.650.816.359.716.359.113.163.212.4651063.210.869.212.473.811.976.111.678.412.480.811.679.811.378.611.977.812.175.613.175.613.174.613.778.813.379.813.674.413.765.814.269.824.689.50.683.7median 12.6median 74.61.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life – A slow charger

Energy consumption

Samsung seems to have a good grip on the Galaxy Tab S10 FE's energy demand. That said, the model also offers significantly lower performance than some other tablets, so it's important to take this into account, especially when evaluating the load values.

The tablet can be charged with a maximum of 25 watts; no charger is included with the tablet. 

Even when using chargers with the appropriate power output, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE did not always charge at full speed in our test lab. It appears that chargers have to support USB Power Delivery in order to enable fast charging. Even then, it takes almost 3 hours to fully charge the device.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.1 / 2.5 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh
Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 1580
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-73%
-52%
-70%
1%
2%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
1.13
46%
1.6
24%
1.26
40%
0.75
64%
1.41 ?(0.72 - 2.1, n=2)
33%
Idle Average *
2.5
4.81
-92%
2.8
-12%
5.57
-123%
1.5
40%
1.975 ?(1.45 - 2.5, n=2)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
4.89
-69%
4.7
-62%
5.61
-93%
1.56
46%
Load Average *
5.8
15.02
-159%
11.4
-97%
12
-107%
7.92
-37%
7.74 ?(5.8 - 9.68, n=2)
-33%
Load Maximum *
7.9
15.22
-93%
16.8
-113%
13.36
-69%
16.5
-109%
10.6 ?(7.9 - 13.4, n=2)
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (2.02-11.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.27 (6.81-7.84)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

Battery life

The 8000-mAh battery managed to keep the tablet going for 14:47 hours in our practical WiFi test. This should get you through a day on the couch, but if you use your tablet regularly you might need to recharge it every night.

Under load, the battery lasts about 4 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 06min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh
Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-12%
21%
19%
Reader / Idle
1489
1534
3%
H.264
967
773
-20%
WiFi v1.3
887
872
-2%
703
-21%
1074
21%
1054
19%
Load
246
224
-9%

Notebookcheck overall rating

Reviewed: Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Reviewed: Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is a lot cheaper than its high-end colleagues, but it cuts quite a lot of corners in terms of performance.

This is particularly problematic given the strong competition and even Apple's offering in this price range with the iPad Air.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE - 04/28/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
67 / 80 → 84%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 67%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
90%
Display
83%
Games Performance
20 / 65 → 31%
Application Performance
62 / 92 → 68%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
54 / 90 → 60%
Average
70%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
80%
Materials
5%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 69.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
81.6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $552.54
List Price: 779€
497 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
IPS
2.
86.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $16.55
2 Pack Galaxy Tab S9 FE S Pe...
2. $21.08
Keyboard Case for Samsung Ga...
3. $29.99
Dexnor Case for Samsung Gala...
List Price: 529€
524 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
TFT-LCD
3.
87.4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3 ⎘
Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon: $529.00
List Price: 699€
460 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
4.
82.2%
Honor Pad V9
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 500€475 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
IPS
5.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 450€500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Is it NFL material or did it peak in high school? Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Review
Florian Schmitt, 2025-04-29 (Update: 2025-05- 2)