Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8768 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Mediatek MT8766B

Mediatek MT8768

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8768

The MediatekMT8768 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) and tablets that was introduced in early 2020. It is most likely manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process (like the similar Helio A25) and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores divided in two clusters. A performance cluster with four cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and a efficiency cluster clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem, a LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison  Helio MT8766B

The Mediatek MT8766B is an entry-level ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets (mainly Android-based) that was introduced in 2020. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz. and a PowerVR GE6300 GPU. It looks very similar to the older Helio A20 (-200 MHz CPU core clock).

The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x. Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-4 DL (150 Mbps download) and Cat-5 UL (75 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 5 modem is integrated.

The SoC should be produced in the same 12nm process as the Helio A20 (most likely the same chip).

ModelMediatek MT8768Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Mediatek MT8766B
SeriesMediatek Mediatek MT8Qualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A53Kryo 260Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek MT8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 « 1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81682 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Mediatek MT87681.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81682 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1500 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 84 / 4
FeaturesLTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 DecoderAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISPPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 Decode
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 650 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610PowerVR GE8300
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.mediatek.com
Technology11 nm12 nm

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8768
0.3 pt (22%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11228     avg: 11876     median: 11431 (10%)     max: 12969 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
13779 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 957     avg: 1390     median: 1251.5 (15%)     max: 2101 Points
853 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 969     avg: 1146     median: 1144 (13%)     max: 1328 Points
860 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
185 Points (6%)
179%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
848 Points (3%)
133%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 135     avg: 156     median: 155 (7%)     max: 179 Points
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 498     avg: 775     median: 798.5 (1%)     max: 1003 Points
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
789 Points (8%)
1472 Points (15%)
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3745 Points (4%)
4938 Points (6%)
2217 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
741 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2043 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10163.3     avg: 11131     median: 11009 (13%)     max: 12342 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
11505 ms (13%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4070     avg: 4855     median: 4215 (4%)     max: 6281 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
3920 Points (4%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
30 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 24     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (7%)     max: 39 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 19097     avg: 21572     median: 21571.5 (18%)     max: 24046 Points
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 15791     avg: 19538     median: 19538 (16%)     max: 23285 Points
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 11434     avg: 11546     median: 11546 (2%)     max: 11658 Points
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 35898     avg: 37935     median: 37935 (14%)     max: 39972 Points
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 89714     avg: 90591     median: 90590.5 (9%)     max: 91467 Points
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
75328 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
132881 Points (8%)
149%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
40100 Points (11%)
165%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
6.9 MB/s (5%)
321%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
171.2 MB/s (5%)
66%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
18.7 MB/s (23%)
83%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
249 MB/s (7%)
166%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6296 Points (10%)
171%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4564     avg: 5215     median: 5215 (24%)     max: 5866 Points
109%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2269 Points (12%)
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5264 Points (11%)
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
6844 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4536     avg: 4750     median: 4750 (31%)     max: 4964 Points
4808 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5647     avg: 6171     median: 6170.5 (31%)     max: 6694 Points
6431 Points (32%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
232 Points (9%)
141%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.1 Watt (1%)
99%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.8 Watt (1%)
99%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8768 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 174% n=19

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 90% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 23:10:13

#0 checking url part for id 12755 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12755 +0.015s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 12755 +0.017s ... 0.066s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.012s ... 0.078s

#10 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.04s ... 0.118s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.009s ... 0.127s

#12 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.011s ... 0.138s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.138s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.24s ... 0.377s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.377s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)