Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

ModelIntel Celeron J4025Intel Celeron N3350
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshApollo Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1296
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$24 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.4 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.2 pt (19%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (19%)
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
178 Points (19%)
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (11%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
293 Points (1%)
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.8 Points (2%)
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (23%)
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2337 Points (14%)
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4556 Points (3%)
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
983 s (12%)
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.1 s (6%)
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
783 Points (1%)
616 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4955 MIPS (3%)
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2636 MIPS (31%)
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (20%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.6 fps (4%)
6.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.1 fps (12%)
32.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1 fps (2%)
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3792 Seconds (27%)
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (31%)
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2575 Points (5%)
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
23.1 s (5%)
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.9 s (2%)
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1176 s (5%)
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4284 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41689 Points (34%)
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41654 Points (34%)
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3720 Points (9%)
min: 941     avg: 986     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5474 Points (10%)
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
500 Points (20%)
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (13%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
927 Points (2%)
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (17%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (4%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (26%)     max: 1341 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2151 ms (3%)
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (7%)     max: 11461 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89.2 Points (16%)
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (9%)     max: 68 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7007 Points (35%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 59% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 11:49:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753868958s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.019s ... 0.037s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.073s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)