Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 660
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 02.12.2020
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (44%)     max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (35%)     max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 42     avg: 59     median: 62 (7%)     max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 52     avg: 93.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 73     avg: 135.5     median: 138 (8%)     max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161     avg: 241     median: 257 (2%)     max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
min: 200834     avg: 295219     median: 305358 (38%)     max: 321314 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (1%)     max: 109.3 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25     avg: 9.6     median: 10.2 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 176% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
med.
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
240%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
110%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
102%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
90%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 642:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 660:
166  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 660:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 120%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 660lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011960
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Genshin Impact59.358.855.6
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile66605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
1

1
4
1
2
2






Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 19:04:35

#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.164s ... 0.166s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.166s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.166s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.038s ... 0.204s

#8 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.008s ... 0.212s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.002s ... 0.213s

#10 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.098s ... 0.311s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.311s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.121s ... 0.432s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.432s

#14 Got 117 rows for game benchmarks. +0.038s ... 0.471s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.471s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.475s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.497s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.497s

#19 return log +0.095s ... 0.591s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)