The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 100%n=8
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 96%n=8
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 96%n=8
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.27
log 15. 23:22:53
#0 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.003s ... 0.028s
#8 got single benchmarks 162 +0.024s ... 0.053s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.003s ... 0.055s
#10 got single benchmarks 322 +0.08s ... 0.136s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.003s ... 0.139s
#12 got single benchmarks 164 +0.024s ... 0.163s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.163s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.112s ... 0.275s