Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Katana GF76 review: Gaming laptop with room for improvement

Gaming combat sword. With the Katana GF76, MSI offers a new upper mid-range gaming laptop. We review the 11UE-036 configuration with the GeForce RTX 3060 laptop GPU and the i7-11800H Tiger Lake CPU. Our review shows what the 1,600-Euro (~$1,908) gaming laptop has to offer for the money.

MSI offers its latest gaming combat sword, the Katana GF76, which is the 17-inch sibling of the 15.6-inch Katana GF66, in various configuration options. The configuration that we have in for testing is the MSI Katana GF76 11UE-036 featuring the Intel Core i7-11800H, the GeForce RTX 3060 laptop GPU, as well as 16 GB of DDR4-3200 RAM, and a 512 GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, and it's the third-best configuration variant.

Among others, the device has to face competitors in the test like the Aorus 17G YD with the same CPU, as well as the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG with the i7-10750H and the GeForce RTX 3070 laptop GPU, which is a superior graphics card.

0017L1-036 (Katana GF76 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 62 W PL2 / Short Burst, 44 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 85 W TDP, GDDR6, 466.63, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200 SDRAM
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB 
, 512 GB
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: combo
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25.2 x 398 x 273 ( = 0.99 x 15.67 x 10.75 in)
Battery
53 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, 180-watt power adapter, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.718 kg ( = 95.87 oz / 5.99 pounds), Power Supply: 490 g ( = 17.28 oz / 1.08 pounds)
Price
1 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.4 %
06/2021
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg25.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.1 %
03/2021
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
80.4 %
03/2021
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
06/2021
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.9 %
06/2021
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440
86 %
06/2021
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case: Relatively compact for a 17.3-inch device

The MSI Katana GF76 comes in a jet-black design with a backlit keyboard that has red accents. If you don't like the somber look, the device is also available as the Sword 17 with a white chassis and blue keyboard backlighting.

Compared to some other gaming laptops, the design of the Katana GF76 is relatively modest. Fortunately, the laptop doesn't have sharp edges - as is the case with swords from which it borrows its name - but it does have an angular design. The most noticeable elements are the large air vents at the back and on the left side that are used for the "Cooler Boost 5" cooling system.

Despite the fact that the case is made of plastic, it makes a solid impression in terms of feel, and a decent one in terms of quality. As you would expect from MSI, workmanship regarding gap dimensions and the like is high quality. The hinges have been designed in such a way that the laptop can be opened with one hand, but the display remains firmly in place despite some slight wobbling.

If we include the other gaming laptops with 17.3-inch displays in our size comparison, the MSI Katana GF76 is quite compact. With its 39.8 x 27.3 cm footprint, it's smaller than the Aorus 17G YD and the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG. Only the Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GM7MG0R) has a slightly smaller size, but it's much thicker than the Katana GF76 in exchange, which measures a good 2.5 cm.

Our test candidate weighs around 2.7 kg. This places it at the front of the 17.3-inch field, and it can even almost keep up with the 15.6-inch Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition that is equipped with the same GPU.

Size comparison

405 mm / 15.9 inch 276 mm / 10.9 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.8 kg6.22 lbs395.7 mm / 15.6 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 30.05 mm / 1.183 inch 2.5 kg5.61 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 273 mm / 10.7 inch 25.2 mm / 0.992 inch 2.7 kg5.99 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.9 kg6.39 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 21.7 mm / 0.854 inch 1.9 kg4.27 lbs356.2 mm / 14 inch 272.5 mm / 10.7 inch 22.85 mm / 0.9 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity: The ports in the Katana GF76 leave room for criticism

MSI hasn't placed any ports at the back, so that everything is located on the left and right sides. Although the number of ports is relatively generous, connectivity could still be improved. There's only one USB-C port, and it doesn't support DisplayPort. Thunderbolt is not available either. External monitors can only be connected to the gaming laptop using the HDMI port that outputs 4K UHD content at up to 60 Hz.

The ports are all easy to reach, but they could have been provided with a bit more space between them on the right side of the case.

Right: 1x network (RJ45), 1x HDMI, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x combo audio
Right: 1x network (RJ45), 1x HDMI, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x combo audio
Left: 1x power supply, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A
Left: 1x power supply, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A

Communication

In addition to the Gigabit LAN port, the latest 802.11ax Wi-Fi standard is on board thanks to Intel's Wi-Fi 6 AX201 module. The Wi-Fi connection is very fast in the test, and it can position itself very far ahead in the comparison field.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s +11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (758min - 1577max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s -2%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1369 (693min - 1436max) MBit/s -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -17%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1149 (933min - 1432max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 (1014min - 1439max) MBit/s +2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s +2%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1302 (718min - 1672max) MBit/s
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -3%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1169 (619min - 1217max) MBit/s -10%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1302 (718-1672)
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1330 (1014-1439)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1306 (711-1563)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1148 (619-1217)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1395 (758-1577)
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1149 (933-1432)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (925-1499)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (693-1436)

Webcam

The webcam serves its purpose, but that's it. It has a resolution of 720p and shows relatively large color deviations in the test (∆E of 13.15).

ColorChecker
13.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Katana GF76 11UE: 13.15 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 24.14 ∆E

Accessories

Apart from the 180-watt power adapter, which has sufficient capacity, MSI doesn't include anything else. No accessories tailored to the device are offered as an option either.

Maintenance

11 small cross-head screws block the way into the interior. This makes it possible for the user to carry out maintenance, replacement, and upgrade procedures. The SO-DIMM slots can accommodate a maximum of 64 GB of RAM. In addition, there's a free M.2 slot for another SSD.

The bottom of the MSI Katana GF76 including the large fan vents
The bottom of the MSI Katana GF76 including the large fan vents

Warranty

MSI offers the usual two-year manufacturer's warranty including Collect & Return. There's no warranty extension available.

Input devices: Keyboard with number pad and Gaming Hotkey

Keyboard

MSI uses the 17.3-inch device's space for a keyboard with a solid key size and a number pad crammed to the right. Looking at the case, there would have been more room to the left and right, but this is probably not possible due to the internal components. Especially the number keys, but also the arrow keys, are quite small. On the other hand, the WASD keys, which are important for gamers, have a comfortable size, just like all the other letters. In addition, there are special Gaming Hotkeys for specific functions as well as for the usual double assignment of the F1 to F12 keys. Unfortunately, a fingerprint sensor is not on board.

The key travel is 1.7 mm. That is generally quite a lot for a laptop and solid for a voluminous gaming device. Noise development remains pleasingly moderate when typing quickly. The typing experience is good, allowing the device to be used not only for gaming but also for the occasional typing session. However, there are definitely better alternatives when it comes to office devices.

The keyboard illumination can be adjusted in three levels, and it makes sure that the keys labeled in red are well illuminated and recognizable. It glows exclusively in red. There are no modifiable colors or other gimmicks on the MSI Katana GF76.

Keyboard and touchpad of the MSI Katana GF76
Keyboard and touchpad of the MSI Katana GF76

Touchpad

The touchpad, which is only slightly recessed, is placed in the center under the space bar and measures 10.5 x 6.5 cm. It's comfortable to the touch, and the two click surfaces at the bottom left and right aren't noticeably loud. The touchpad works with pleasant precision, so there are hardly any points of criticism in our review of the Katana GF76 in this regard.

Display: Fast 144 Hz refresh rate but many weaknesses as well

In addition to the powerful hardware, the 17.3-inch display is one of the Katana GF76's highlights according to the manufacturer. It refreshes at a fast 144 Hz, which provides for a smooth gaming experience combined with the performance level. The IPS panel with LED backlight has a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels and a matte surface.

245
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 274 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 250.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 260 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.71
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
41.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.068
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
AU Optronics B156HAN08.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Aorus 17G YD
Sharp LQ173M1JW04, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
63%
-5%
69%
76%
Display P3 Coverage
39.8
64.7
63%
37.65
-5%
68.1
71%
72.3
82%
sRGB Coverage
59.5
96.4
62%
56.3
-5%
98.5
66%
100
68%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.12
66.9
63%
38.9
-5%
69.3
69%
73.7
79%
Response Times
69%
-11%
79%
58%
64%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.8 ?(17.2, 19.6)
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
80%
36.8 ?(19.2, 17.6)
-0%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
89%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
54%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
58%
31.6 ?(18.4, 13.2)
-22%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
68%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
62%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
65%
PWM Frequency
24510 ?(39)
Screen
21%
-15%
21%
6%
10%
Brightness middle
260
328
26%
266.5
3%
329
27%
370
42%
286
10%
Brightness
251
314
25%
262
4%
321
28%
333
33%
282
12%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
91
7%
92
8%
84
-1%
73
-14%
Black Level *
0.26
0.29
-12%
0.18
31%
0.27
-4%
0.38
-46%
0.24
8%
Contrast
1000
1131
13%
1481
48%
1219
22%
974
-3%
1192
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.9
1.93
51%
5.33
-37%
2.78
29%
2.41
38%
2.79
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.64
4.94
76%
18.28
11%
4.88
76%
7.32
65%
6.23
70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.71
0.68
82%
4.36
-18%
1.63
56%
1.19
68%
0.82
78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
2.8
-75%
4.5
-181%
2.5
-56%
3.9
-144%
3.5
-119%
Gamma
2.068 106%
2.18 101%
2.35 94%
2.106 104%
2.287 96%
2.358 93%
CCT
6511 100%
7023 93%
6289 103%
6201 105%
7302 89%
6147 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67
35.6
76
69
74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
55.8
99
93
96
Total Average (Program / Settings)
51% / 37%
-10% / -12%
50% / 31%
44% / 27%
50% / 32%

* ... smaller is better

In addition to the modest brightness, the remaining values are also rather poor. The display doesn't even cover 60% of the sRGB color space. Response times, which are even more relevant for gamers, aren't all that good either. While we could extend this list by quite a bit, we'll keep it short: The displays of most of the comparison devices are significantly better, and they have refresh rates that are at least as fast.

CalMAN: Grayscales
CalMAN: Grayscales
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Although the brightness of around 250 cd/m² isn't particularly high, unfortunately, the device is still acceptable for outdoor use - at least when the sun isn't shining too brightly. This is mostly due to the matte and non-reflective display.

However, since the device is relatively bulky by design due to it being a gaming laptop, it's unlikely to be used outdoors. The anti-glare panel also has an advantage when gaming indoors. The matte display hardly reflects any light sources, which means that you always have a good view of the game.

MSI Katana GF76 11UE vs. sRGB (59%)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE vs. sRGB (59%)
Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
MSI Katana GF76 11UE vs. AdobeRGB (41%)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE vs. AdobeRGB (41%)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Viewing-angle stability is excellent thanks to the IPS panel, allowing content to be easily recognized even from oblique viewing angles.

Thanks to the IPS panel, content can still be recognized from very oblique viewing angles as well
Thanks to the IPS panel, content can still be recognized from very oblique viewing angles as well
The device is also suitable for outdoor use with some limitations
The device is also suitable for outdoor use with some limitations

Performance: Gaming laptop with fast CPU

MSI offers the Katana GF76 in many different configurations. In addition to two variants (11SC-081 and 11UC-210) with the Intel Core i5-11400H, most models are equipped with the Intel Core i7-11800H from the Tiger Lake generation. These include the Katana 11US-083 that comes with the GeForce RTX 3050 laptop GPU, various models with the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti laptop GPU, and finally, the top model with the GeForce RTX 3070 laptop GPU.

Our MSI Katana GF76 11UE-036 test device is one of the best configuration variants. It's equipped with the Intel Core i7-11800H Tiger Lake CPU, the GeForce RTX 3060 laptop GPU, 16 GB of DDR4-3200 RAM, and a 512 GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

Processor

Intel's Core i7-11800H is a CPU from the Tiger Lake generation specifically designed for gaming laptops and workstations. MSI makes maximum use of the 45-watt TDP and allows a short-term peak of up to 60 watts. The clock rate goes from a minimum of 2.3 GHz to a maximum of 4.6 GHz in single-core Turbo mode as well as 4.2 GHz for all cores. Thanks to the L3 cache that has increased to 24 MB, among other things, the new Tiger Lake CPU offers significantly more performance than the Intel Core i7-10875H (Comet Lake H) predecessor with clock speeds of 2.3 to 5.1 GHz and 16 MB of L3 cache.

In the benchmarks, the MSI Katana GF76 isn't quite able to keep up with the Aorus 17G YD, which has the same CPU but a higher PL2 value, or the CPU average. Thanks to the newer CPU, however, it positions itself clearly ahead of the competitors in our comparison field that are equipped with the Intel Core i7-10750H as well as the Intel Core i7-10870H. Here, the current Tiger Lake H generation shows what it's capable of and its considerable performance gain. Nevertheless, it's well known that the CPU has to give way to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H from the Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition in some cases. On battery power, the CPU only achieves a good 60% of its performance level when plugged in during the Cinebench benchmark.

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1681 (1645.14-1822.57)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1090 (1079.56-1097.57)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1367 (1316.83-1382.98)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1943 (1915.62-2089.21)
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points +21%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points -4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
1248 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1225 Points -18%
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +77%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
12862 Points +16%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points +10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
11080 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
8408 Points -24%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
6921 (6730.84min - 6920.58max) Points -38%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points +21%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points -3%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
541 Points -7%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
483 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points -18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
460 Points -21%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +77%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4818 Points +14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points +12%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
4214 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points -23%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
2998 Points -29%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
2673 Points -37%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +19%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points +3%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
202 Points -11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +70%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
2089 Points +15%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points +10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1823 (1645.14min - 1822.57max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points -24%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1258 (1113.24min - 1257.82max) Points -31%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
1098 (1079.56min - 1097.57max) Points -40%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
403 Seconds * -42%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * -15%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
284.1 Seconds * -0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
284 Seconds *
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * +30%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS +1%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5547 MIPS +1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
5511 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
5236 MIPS -5%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
5209 MIPS -5%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +71%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS +19%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
48261 MIPS +7%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
45311 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS -10%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
36161 MIPS -20%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
33084 MIPS -27%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points +15%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1583 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1568 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
1310 Points -16%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1304 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +61%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
9317 Points +10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
8470 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points -21%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
6392 Points -25%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
6355 Points -25%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +60%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.8 fps +19%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps +11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.3 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps -17%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps -22%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.35 fps -30%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * -14%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.9 s * -3%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.2 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
45.2 s * +8%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
39 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.592 sec * -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.589 sec * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * -3%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.559 sec *
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.558 sec * -0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1823 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
187 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
226 Points
Help

System performance

System performance paints the same picture: The Aorus 17G YD usually performs even better, and the Katana GF76 doesn't entirely reach the CPU/GPU average, either. However, compared with the other devices, it performs well, which is mainly thanks to the new CPU generation. Therefore, there are no problems in everyday use, and the laptop runs at a fast speed.

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +17%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7073 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6156 - 6865, n=4)
6558 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6505 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6017 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points -13%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5390 Points -17%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +11%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10295 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9063 - 10522, n=4)
9829 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9695 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points -5%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9093 Points -6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8652 Points -11%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +10%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9259 Points +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8874 Points
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8657 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8200 - 8874, n=4)
8648 Points -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7729 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points -19%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +32%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10075 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8520 - 9423, n=4)
9011 Points +4%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8684 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7893 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points -13%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6047 Points -30%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5458 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
5458 Points 0%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5265 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4073 Points -25%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7104 Points +14%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6208 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
6208 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5375 Points -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5458 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
9135 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6208 points
PCMark 10 Score
6505 points
Help

DPC latencies

The Katana GF76 exhibited very high latencies in our test, and these were confirmed over multiple repetitions. This implies that the device isn't ideal for real-time audio and video editing. That said, this always remains a momentary snapshot.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4527 μs *
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1082 μs * +76%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1064 μs * +76%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
788 μs * +83%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
743 μs * +84%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * +91%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The SSD installed in the MSI Katana GF76 is not really able to convince in the test. On one hand, it's relatively small for a gaming device with 512 GB. However, thanks to the free M.2 slot (NVMe PCIe Gen 3), an additional SSD can be added later if necessary. Furthermore, the device is also available with a 1 TB SSD and an otherwise identical configuration for an extra charge in the form of the Katana GF76 11UE-058.

The built-in model's operating speed is modest. In our benchmarks, it predominantly lands at the bottom of the list, it achieves significantly worse rates than most comparison models, and it also scores 10% worse than the average of all devices equipped with this SSD. It's not a clear performance bottleneck in everyday use though. However, copying operations and the like can sometimes take a bit longer than in other gaming laptops.

MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Aorus 17G YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
66%
25%
98%
132%
9%
Write 4K
107.3
143.7
34%
157.3
47%
116.9
9%
145.7
36%
227.4
112%
194.5 ?(107.3 - 286, n=8)
81%
Read 4K
45.46
45.1
-1%
46.69
3%
44.56
-2%
51.3
13%
91.3
101%
Write Seq
978
978
0%
2389
144%
1552
59%
3036
210%
2241
129%
Read Seq
1255
1163
-7%
2196
75%
1682
34%
2837
126%
4496
258%
Write 4K Q32T1
579
519
-10%
407.6
-30%
497.8
-14%
511
-12%
661
14%
505 ?(327 - 625, n=8)
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
299.6
302.7
1%
519
73%
436.8
46%
582
94%
712
138%
Write Seq Q32T1
978
981
0%
2401
146%
1461
49%
3294
237%
1540
57%
Read Seq Q32T1
1977
1983
0%
3344
69%
2364
20%
3522
78%
6806
244%
AS SSD
24%
195%
83%
203%
308%
41%
Seq Read
1704
1659
-3%
3002
76%
2082
22%
2876
69%
5150
202%
Seq Write
716
921
29%
2420
238%
825
15%
2803
291%
3920
447%
4K Read
37.77
51
35%
48.46
28%
42.41
12%
55.3
46%
46.6
23%
4K Write
66
120.1
82%
114.3
73%
98.3
49%
106.9
62%
145.8
121%
118.9 ?(66 - 170.5, n=10)
80%
4K-64 Read
441.2
463.5
5%
1873
325%
1255
184%
1662
277%
2071
369%
4K-64 Write
735
909
24%
1882
156%
738
0%
2101
186%
3267
344%
Access Time Read *
0.191
0.179
6%
0.045
76%
0.109
43%
0.067
65%
0.078
59%
Access Time Write *
0.053
0.032
40%
0.101
-91%
0.17
-221%
0.037
30%
0.029
45%
Score Read
649
680
5%
2221
242%
1506
132%
2005
209%
2633
306%
Score Write
872
1121
29%
2238
157%
918
5%
2488
185%
2805
222%
Score Total
1816
2130
17%
5565
206%
3136
73%
5520
204%
7716
325%
Copy ISO MB/s
912
2421
165%
1391
53%
2029
122%
3190
250%
Copy Program MB/s
278.9
705
153%
645
131%
691
148%
987
254%
373 ?(248 - 609, n=7)
34%
Copy Game MB/s
144.6
1490
930%
1101
661%
1513
946%
2096
1350%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 15%
131% / 148%
54% / 62%
151% / 165%
220% / 244%
25% / 30%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1977 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 299.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1255 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 107.3 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

Compared with other gaming laptops using the GeForce RTX 3060 laptop GPU, the MSI Katana GF76 11UE-036 isn't quite able to keep up most of the time. It scores slightly less points in most benchmarks and also ends up below the GPU average. This shows that MSI isn't exploiting the full potential of the graphics solution but is keeping it on a tight leash instead with a TGP of a good 85 watts. MSI restrains the GPU even further on battery power (TGP of around 45 watts).

Needless to say, the Katana GF76 can't really compete with the even more powerful graphics solutions found in the other test devices. Users who need more graphics power than what is offered by the 11UE-036 configuration can get the GeForce RTX 3070 laptop GPU with the 11UG-090 version. If the Nvidia GPU is not needed, the CPU's integrated Intel UHD Graphics takes over.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +64%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
38275 Points +55%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
36043 Points +46%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
26881 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 30772, n=43)
26816 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
26790 Points +9%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24656 Points
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
23840 Points -3%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points +17%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
130616 Points +12%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
117148 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
116504 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
104577 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 136826, n=38)
101628 Points -13%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
82246 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +56%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
29128 Points +55%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27275 Points +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16354 - 23109, n=49)
20436 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
20381 Points +8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
20312 Points +8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
18851 Points
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
18434 Points -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +68%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
10850 Points +51%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10144 Points +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8295 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6285 - 9235, n=49)
8057 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points +8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7175 Points
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
7041 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
21217 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113376 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44408 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16909 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7349 points
Help

Gaming performance

When it comes to gaming performance, the device delivers an above-average performance under low load. The frame rate then drops below the GPU average as the demand on the GPU increases, which is due to the poor TGP.

The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (34.2 - 617, n=141, last 2 years)
329 fps +43%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
267 (51min, 92.9P0.1, 164P1 - 557max) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (204 - 296, n=33)
237 fps +3%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
229.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
229 (68.3min, 99.8P0.1, 142P1 - 378max) fps 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
223.2 (209min - 231max) fps -3%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years)
220 fps +64%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
183 (68.1min, 80.8P0.1, 115P1 - 443max) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 186.8, n=41)
144.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
144 (55.2min, 60.2P0.1, 99.7P1 - 296max) fps +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
142 fps +6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134.4 fps
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134.2 (126min - 143max) fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +61%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
109 (83min) fps +50%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 (43.4min, 50.9P0.1, 68.2P1 - 195max) fps +46%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1 - 167max) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75.6 (64min) fps +4%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.6 (61min) fps
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 (63min - 74max) fps -5%

The frame rates in The Witcher 3 are in the lower half of the test field, but they are constant and absolutely sufficient throughout the entire time. All the games that we tested ran without issues and very smoothly at the maximum supported resolution of 1920x1080 pixels and the highest settings. The MSI Katana GF76 doesn't show any weaknesses here yet, but it could eventually reach its limits in future and even more demanding games.

05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125Tooltip
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø70.7 (67-74)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø107 (96-112)
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø65.9 (62-70)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø73.6 (66-77)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø88.8 (83-97)
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø116.4 (109-125)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 178.9 171.6 146.9 81.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 340.9 229.4 134.4 72.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 168 150 140 130
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 208.5 200.3 132.9 110.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 161 98.5 74.4 54.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 121 104 83.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 105 97 91
Strange Brigade (2018) 372 179 144 125
F1 2020 (2020) 242 169 148 97.6
Dirt 5 (2020) 144 92.1 77.2 65.4
Days Gone (2021) 167.2 108.3 95 71.9

Emissions: Loud in both ways

Noise emissions

The powerful hardware has its drawbacks as well. At 33 to 35 dB(A), the device only produces a whispering noise in idle usage, but it's already quite audible here. When the device is under stress, the cooling section of the Katana GF76 emits well over 50 decibels.

Although this isn't unusual for a gaming laptop, it's a bit louder compared with some other devices. At least the fan noise remains at a relatively constant level across all load levels, and it doesn't keep fluctuating back and forth. Other unwanted noise, such as transistor whine or the like, didn't occur in our test device.

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
Load
53 / 57 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.13638.634.6392534.834.531.834.439.23143.646.942.342.544.44028.935.830.927.331.35037.143.241.822.237.16332.733.630.831.935.58031.726.624.921.128.910030.922.622.816.431.512530.728.926.818.631.116032.129.828.219.733.720029.123.823.521.933.42503226.524.119.534.531534.523.72316.736.740033.122.421.613.637.3500352321.812.33863036.523.322.611.2398003824.223.810.740.6100038.723.823.710.941.812504326.226.211.545.5160041.123.823.811.644.2200044.924.124.511.847.8250043.320.420.512.346.5315043.81919.213.346.9400043.317.517.814.846.9500040.615.515.21444.5630039.214.514.213.544.2800033.814.413.713.6391000032.614.413.513.2381250026.713.514.412.732.51600021.912.612.412.325.7SPL53.434.133.925.356.7N8.621.90.710.8median 35median 23median 22.6median 13.3median 39Delta4.33.53.22.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Katana GF76 11UE

Temperature

The MSI Katana GF76 sometimes heats up to over 50 °C (~122 °F) under load. Therefore, placing the device on the lap while gaming with shorts is not the best idea. As usual, however, the hottest area is directly in front of the screen.

The keyboard area reaches a reasonable 40 °C (~104 °F) and the touchpad around 35 °C (~95 °F), so that heat development doesn't have a particularly negative impact on the user's hands. The device only heats up marginally above room temperature in idle usage.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test

When the CPU and GPU run under full load in our stress test, the Intel Core i7-11800H settles at around 2,300 MHz and about 90 °C (~194 °F). The GPU reaches rates of 1,320 MHz and 83 °C (~181 °F).

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 gains another 150 MHz in The Witcher 3, but it doesn't get hotter. The CPU then runs at around 4,400 MHz and 80 °C (~176 °F). Activating Cooler Boost lowers the temperatures even further, but this has a very negative impact on noise levels.

The device delivers a significantly reduced performance on battery power. When disconnected from a power outlet, the MSI Katana GF76 only achieves 7,142 points in 3DMark 11 under otherwise identical settings. In contrast, it achieves 21,217 points when plugged in.

Max. Load
 51 °C
124 F
49 °C
120 F
49 °C
120 F
 
 43 °C
109 F
47 °C
117 F
45 °C
113 F
 
 30 °C
86 F
36 °C
97 F
34 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 51 °C = 124 F
Average: 42.7 °C = 109 F
49 °C
120 F
49 °C
120 F
52 °C
126 F
40 °C
104 F
44 °C
111 F
40 °C
104 F
27 °C
81 F
32 °C
90 F
29 °C
84 F
Maximum: 52 °C = 126 F
Average: 40.2 °C = 104 F
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C = 118 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

Speakers

The relatively loud stereo speakers of the Katana GF76 are suitable when it comes to drowning out the noise generated by the fans. They reproduce highs well and mids solidly. As in most laptops, however, bass is lacking. Gamers will prefer to use a headset or headphones as an audio solution anyway; they can be connected to the laptop using the combined port (3.5 mm audio jack) or Bluetooth 5.2. This also makes the fan noise less annoying.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.642.32534.435.93142.544.24027.331.15022.227.46331.934.98021.128.110016.430.412518.64116019.746.220021.951.825019.562.431516.767.240013.668.850012.375.863011.276.380010.773.2100010.971.7125011.571.8160011.670.3200011.870.6250012.369.8315013.371.1400014.864.950001465.6630013.570.5800013.667.21000013.263.41250012.764.31600012.365.9SPL25.382.8N0.758.2median 13.3median 67.2Delta2.45.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.440.845.235.641.146.451.929.535.424.934.426.836.817.836.615241525.116.725.918.333.115.849.214.557.512.465.411.972.911.87711.477.112.276.212.672.212.76812.565.712.865.714.465.515.470.113.867.813.467.213.268.313.165.612.872.312.173.325.583.30.756.2median 13.1median 67.21.410.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Katana GF76 11UEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzAorus 17G YD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 17G YD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy management: Frugal but not enduring

Energy consumption

The Katana GF76 UE11-036 is relatively frugal in terms of energy consumption considering it's a gaming laptop. It requires about 20% less power than most of the comparison models, which are partly also equipped with even more power-hungry components. In idle usage, the test device is satisfied with an average of just 13 watts. Under full load, however, it reaches the limit of the 180-watt power adapter.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.8 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9 / 13 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 102 / 187 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
15%
-19%
-23%
-65%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
9
12
-33%
5.4
40%
11
-22%
13
-44%
24
-167%
Idle Average *
13
16
-23%
12.8
2%
14
-8%
16
-23%
26
-100%
Idle Maximum *
20
28
-40%
19.5
2%
25
-25%
29
-45%
38
-90%
Load Average *
102
92
10%
86.6
15%
123
-21%
100
2%
101
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149
198
-33%
115.7
22%
176
-18%
173
-16%
164
-10%
Load Maximum *
187
210
-12%
175.2
6%
226
-21%
213
-14%
230
-23%

* ... smaller is better

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
MSI Katana GF76 11UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø148.5 (142-154)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø175.9 (173-183)

Battery life

Despite the pretty low energy consumption, the Katana GF76 loses the battle for the best battery life. Almost every other competitor offers much more endurance.

The reason for this is that the battery's capacity of 53 Wh is modest compared to the competition. It's sufficient to play video games for an hour or to stream movies for three hours without using a power outlet. However, the Katana GF76 UE11 is undoubtedly at its best when the power adapter is plugged in.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
4h 46min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 40min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
3h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 20min
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 51 Wh
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-2%
46%
87%
29%
58%
59%
Reader / Idle
286
337
18%
667
133%
881
208%
462
62%
541
89%
H.264
232
525
126%
283
22%
370
59%
WiFi v1.3
220
252
15%
276
25%
306
39%
293
33%
360
64%
Witcher 3 ultra
50
96
92%
Load
80
49
-39%
65
-19%
55
-31%
80
0%
96
20%

Pros

+ fast Tiger Lake CPU
+ upgradeable SSD and RAM
+ compact dimensions for a 17.3-inch device
+ fast WLAN

Cons

- GPU potential not exploited
- no Thunderbolt or DisplayPort
- display shows various weaknesses
- moderate battery life

Verdict: The MSI Katana GF76 only convinces to a limited extent in the test

In review: MSI Katana GF76. Test device provided by MSI.
In review: MSI Katana GF76. Test device provided by MSI.

The MSI Katana GF76 gaming laptop, which has a rather restrained look, is convincing on paper with its fast CPU and good GPU. In practice, however, it misses the mark a bit in terms of performance.

Nevertheless, performance is completely sufficient to provide a smooth and impressive gaming experience at Full HD resolution and high details in all tested games.

The fan could be a bit quieter, the battery could last longer, and there's also room for improvement when it comes to the ports. Although the panel refreshes at 144 Hz, it leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to many metrics.

To revisit MSI's own naming associations once again: The Katana GF76 11UE-036 isn't a blunt combat sword, but it could definitely use some sharpening here and there. We would have expected a bit more at an MSRP of $1,499.

MSI offers other configurations as an alternative. If you want to experience the full potential of the built-in CPU and also want higher graphics power but are willing to spend a bit more in return, you'll find a better solution in the Aorus 17G YD, among others. The MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG, which is in a similar price range, also offers more graphics performance but an older CPU.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the MSI Katana GF76 is only officially available in Micro Center stores. This configuration comes with the Intel Core i7-11800H, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, 16 GB of DDR4-3200 RAM, and a 1 TB SSD, and it will set you back $1,499.99. Alternatively, you can also keep tabs on online stores like Amazon or newegg and wait for the device to pop up here.

MSI Katana GF76 11UE - 06/26/2021 v7
Marcus Schwarten

Chassis
80 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
48 / 80 → 60%
Weight
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Battery
55 / 95 → 58%
Display
82%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
79%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Average
71%
80%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > MSI Katana GF76 review: Gaming laptop with room for improvement
Marcus Schwarten, 2021-06-30 (Update: 2021-06-30)