Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900KIntel Core i7-12700
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3200 - 5200 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB1 MB
L2 Cache14 MB12 MB
L3 Cache30 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 2412 / 20
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$589 U.S.$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
Die Size215 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
50.7 pt (70%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
47 pt (65%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (85%)     max: 2011 Points
1894 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (86%)     max: 777 Points
731 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (87%)     max: 292 Points
272 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (87%)     max: 3.5 Points
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (78%)     max: 112893 Points
103354 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (79%)     max: 6580 MIPS
6292 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (70%)     max: 206 fps
172.4 fps (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (85%)     max: 368.5 fps
347 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2 GB/s
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (86%)     max: 97955 Points
72464 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (71%)     max: 28789 Points
27022 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (84%)     max: 118702 Points
96264 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (85%)     max: 2042 Points
1924 Points (81%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (71%)     max: 64238 Points
52676 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
508 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96769 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (68%)     max: 330 Points
314 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2308 Points (88%)
2016 Points (77%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (37%)
82.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 90% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 05:40:34

#0 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.019s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.023s ... 0.065s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.017s ... 0.082s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.013s ... 0.095s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.398s ... 0.493s

#12 return log +0.028s ... 0.521s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)