Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10600K

The Intel Core i5-10600K is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 4.1 and 4.8 GHz and can execute up to twelfe threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high clock speeds (and possible TDP settings with most mainboards), the Core i5-10600K offers a similar speed than the old Core i7-9700K quad core. Compared to current AMD offerings, the multi-core performance is on par with a Ryzen 5 3600, single core and gaming performance with a faster Ryzen 9 3900.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900KIntel Core i5-10600K
CodenameAlder LakeComet Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K « 4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3200 - 5200 MHz4100 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB384 KB
L2 Cache14 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache30 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 246 / 12
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$589 U.S.$262 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
43.7 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10600K
31.9 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
10475 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (84%)     max: 2011 Points
1385 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (84%)     max: 777 Points
464 Points (51%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
3443 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
1452 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (80%)     max: 292 Points
205 Points (57%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
15.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.5 Points
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
7343 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
40074 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (72%)     max: 112893 Points
51816 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
9594 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
113.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
6536 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
40379 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (78%)     max: 6580 MIPS
5289 MIPS (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (5%)     max: 206 fps
88.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (9%)     max: 368.5 fps
251.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
12.2 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (57%)     max: 2 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
8 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
302.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
438.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (75%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (65%)     max: 28789 Points
15961 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
68275 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
68908 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (80%)     max: 118702 Points
70668 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
13014 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
20040 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
8290 Points (35%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2715 Points (68%)
1830 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
17450 Points (68%)
10290 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (78%)     max: 2042 Points
1286 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
7248 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
1281 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
7237 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
5821 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (64%)     max: 64238 Points
28391 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
760 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96769 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 330 Points
239 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2308 Points (86%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
204.4 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
172.5 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10600K → 60% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 15. 03:54:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12212 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757901295s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Sep 2025 14:08:46 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12212 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 12212 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.071s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)