Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron J4115

Intel Core i7-9700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700

The Intel Core i7-9700 is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3 - 4.7 GHz. Compared to the similar named Core i7-9700K, the 9700 has no open multiplicator for easy overclocking, offers lower clock speeds and offers a reduced TDP.

Compared to the old Core i7-8700, the 9700 offers two more real cores but no Hyperthreading. Therefore, the performance gain is not that big - depending on the app. The single core performance was slightly improved thanks to the higher Turbo clocks. As a high end desktop CPU, the i7-9700 is well suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 65 Watt (instead of the 95W of the faster models) and therefore the CPU wont need a high end desktop cooling system.

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-9700Intel Celeron N4020Intel Celeron J4115
CodenameCoffee Lake-RGemini Lake refreshGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 « 3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50051.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3000 - 4700 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz1800 - 2500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 24 / 4
TDP65 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14++ nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9700
31.3 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
15.6 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
616 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
308 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
474 Points (52%)
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2892 Points (7%)
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1254 Points (8%)
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
199 Points (55%)
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 78.9 Points
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
3.2 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (53%)
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7473 Points (45%)
2184 Points (13%)
2087 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37381 Points (27%)
7426 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i7-9700 +
49666 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i7-9700 +
9840 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
155.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6945 Points (11%)
1203 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
33539 MIPS (19%)
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5186 MIPS (61%)
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.6 fps (2%)
17.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
247.5 fps (6%)
76.3 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.5 fps (18%)
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (23%)
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388.7 Seconds (3%)
4064 Seconds (29%)
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2495 Points (5%)
3683 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
460.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13939 Points (34%)
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 i7-9700 +
79476 Points (65%)
27642 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 i7-9700 +
79073 Points (64%)
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i7-9700 +
79079 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11688 Points (30%)
1286 Points (3%)
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16387 Points (29%)
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6867 Points (29%)
476 Points (2%)
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
400 Points (9%)
361 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
706 Points (3%)
1125 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1312 Points (44%)
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (16%)     max: 475 Points
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (13%)     max: 410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7060 Points (13%)
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
1300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
7060 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
5777 Points (58%)
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-9700 +
27040 Points (27%)
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (3%)     max: 3462 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
790 ms (1%)
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (14%)     max: 61.1 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
232 Points (42%)
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (14%)     max: 84.2 Points
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
143.8 Watt (25%)
12.5 Watt (2%)
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
141.9 Watt (26%)
10.1 Watt (2%)
12.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i7-9700 +
8.8 Points per Watt (7%)
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700 → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 21% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 26% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 23. 15:20:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12254 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761225603s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:39:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12254 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 12254 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.016s ... 0.042s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#13 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.005s ... 0.05s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.112s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)