Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8600K vs Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-8600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8600K

The Intel Core i5-8600K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to six threads simultaneously (no HyperThreading). According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i5-8600K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier.

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased significantly compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i5-8600K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is basically identical to the previous generation Intel HD Graphics 630. Only some low demanding games are playable with this graphics card (see GPU page linked above).

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

ModelIntel Core i5-8600KIntel Core i5-11400F
CodenameCoffee Lake-SRocket Lake
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Rocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB480 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 66 / 12
TDP95 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA1200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size276 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$157 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10235 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1339 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
502 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3945 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 988     avg: 990     median: 989.5 (6%)     max: 991 Points
1574 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
181 Points (50%)
210 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.8 Points (14%)
17.7 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (49%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6875 Points (42%)
6210 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32863 Points (24%)
44220 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
57417 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8876 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
188.8 s (2%)
117.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.7 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4583 Points (7%)
7147 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
41522 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5466 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 61     avg: 63.4     median: 63.4 (2%)     max: 65.7 fps
91.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 230.3     avg: 232.7     median: 232.7 (6%)     max: 235 fps
258 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
13.5 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (16%)
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.4 GB/s (14%)
8.7 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
290.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9078 Points (19%)
13359 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.72     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19.67     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (1%)     max: 19.8 s
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 488.9     avg: 496.5     median: 496.5 (2%)     max: 504 s
703 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57236 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10708     avg: 10833     median: 10833 (27%)     max: 10958 Points
15367 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74934 Points (61%)
71688 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
74763 Points (61%)
71496 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74053 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8492     avg: 8523     median: 8522.5 (22%)     max: 8553 Points
13346 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12916     avg: 13019     median: 13018.5 (23%)     max: 13121 Points
21144 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8468 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1575 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7681 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1543 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7679 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6836 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30191 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
18970 Points (34%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4217 Points (55%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
19770 Points (31%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4417 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1022 ms (1%)
654 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
68.1 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
255 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
236 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
204 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8600K → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 134% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 11. 14:44:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9800 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757594675s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9800 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9800 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.052s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)