Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-7100H vs AMD A6-9220e

Intel Core i3-7100H

► remove from comparison Intel i3-7100H

The Intel Core i3-7100H is a dual-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is probably based on the quad-core die from the other H-series processor with two deactivated cores considering the TDP and the integrated HD Graphics 630. The two CPU cores run at 3GHZ without a Turbo, and the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel HD Graphics 630 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architektur

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Compared to the similarly branded, but much more efficient Core i3-7100U (2.4 GHz, 15-Watt TDP), the i3-7100H has much higher clocks and the performance is almost on par with theCore i5-7200U (2.5-3.1 GHz).

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 950 MHz in this case. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration. Compared to HD 620 GPUs, the higher TDP could result in better sustained performance.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. The TDP is pretty high for a dual-core processor at 35 Watts, so the CPU is not suited fpr thin and light notebooks (where the i3-7100U comes into play).

AMD A6-9220e

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220e

The AMD A6-9220e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. The 9220e is an entry-level Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.6 - 2.4 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the similar named A6-9220 the 9220e is significantly slower clocked (2.5 - 2.9 GHz) including the GPU (600 versus 655 MHz) and can be passively cooled thanks to the TDP of 6W.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220e is noticeably slower than the A6-9220. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark the 9220 reaches 38% higher scores, in the single thread test its more than twice as fast (219% versus the 9220 in the HP 255 G6). Compared to Intel CPUs, the A6-9220e is on par with the old Celeron N2820 in Cinebench (single and multi core). Therefore, the CPU is placed in the lowest segment (performance wise) and only suited for light tasks and light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220e with 6 Watts and therefore significantly below the 15 W of the A6-9220. This means the APU can be passively cooled and is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelIntel Core i3-7100HAMD A6-9220e
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H « 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3000 MHz1600 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP35 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1356BGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NISingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 950 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$393 U.S.
Announced
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
73 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
110 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 325     avg: 327.5     median: 327.5 (2%)     max: 330 Points
86 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
130 Points (39%)
31 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4870 Points (29%)
1056 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11172 Points (8%)
1741 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
503 s (6%)
1517 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.9 s (3%)
35.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2713 Points (4%)
519 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.3 fps (7%)
2.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
113.6 fps (26%)
14.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
0.3 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4231 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.6 s (3%)
66.4 s (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.5 s (1%)
113.1 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2732 s (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4559 Points (12%)
529 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
4502 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
4404 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
5273 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
444 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5154 Points (9%)
376 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2022 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
260 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
293 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1260 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1571 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1112 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1513 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1929 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2003 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1329 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3297 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2796 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3496 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3085 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3192 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4105 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
357.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
9070 Points (8%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
64 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7100H → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220e → 37% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 11:05:08

#0 checking url part for id 8418 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11876 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8418 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 8418 +0.013s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11876 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#9 got single benchmarks 11876 +0.012s ... 0.079s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.283s ... 0.361s

#12 return log +0.04s ... 0.401s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)