Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Celeron N4120 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8750

Intel Atom x7-Z8700

► remove from comparison Intel Z8700

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom Z3795, the Atom x7-Z8700 offers about 5 percent more performance and is similar fast as an AMD A6-6210 APU or high-end ARM SoCs, e.g. the Snapdragon 810 or Exynos 7420.

Using Windows, the performance is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance somewhere between the Qualcomm Adreno 330 / PowerVR G6430 and the Adreno 420 / PowerVR GX6450.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4120 in our database is not much faster than AMD's Zen-based, affordable Athlon Silver 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the Intel Celeron 6305 and the Core i5-7Y54 found close nearby as well. It's a very basic CPU that we're talking about here. While it does have four cores, these are some seriously slow cores, dashing hopes of anybody looking to get a Core i3-like performance for cheap.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, Celeron N4120 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a good option for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. It's manufactured on a very old (as of late 2022) 14 nm process, though, making for poor energy efficiency.

Intel Atom x7-Z8750

► remove from comparison Intel Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level laptops and passive-cooled tablets, which has been presented in early 2016. It is clocked at 1.1 - 2.56 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail. In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Compared to the similar Pentium N3710, the Atom x7-Z8750 is tuned for less power consumption and offers less PCI-Express lanes (2 instead of 4) and less USB 3.0 ports (3 instead of 5). Furthermore, the integrated GPU clocks only at 600 (instead of 700) MHz and the memory controller supports LPDDR3-1600.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Due to the passive cooling and lower TDP, the Atom x7-Z8750 is a bit slower than the similar clocked Pentium N3710. The boost frequency of the CPU cores wont be used as long as in an average Pentium based laptop. However, if TDP and cooling are similar, the performance should be comparable. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software or multitasking.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is not rated with a TDP, but only an SDP (Scenario Design Power) of 2 Watt (N3710 SDP 4 Watt, TDP 6 Watt). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Atom x7-Z8700Intel Celeron N4120Intel Atom x7-Z8750
CodenameCherry TrailGemini Lake RefreshCherry Trail
SeriesIntel Atom x7Intel Gemini LakeIntel Atom x7
Series: Atom x7 Cherry Trail
Intel Atom x7-Z87501.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 « 1.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z87001.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz1600 - 2560 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C90 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell, 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP6 Watt
SocketBGA1090UTFCBGA1380
$37 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4120
16.7 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 965     avg: 1149     median: 1230 (1%)     max: 1253 Points
50%
1 Z8750 +
612 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 409     avg: 416.5     median: 416.5 (17%)     max: 424 Points
50%
1 Z8750 +
208 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 159     avg: 163.3     median: 165 (18%)     max: 166 Points
47%
1 Z8750 +
78 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 376     avg: 460.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 516 Points
45%
1 Z8750 +
220 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 116     median: 116 (1%)     max: 134 Points
min: 223     avg: 227     median: 224 (1%)     max: 234 Points
133 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (10%)     max: 38 Points
min: 73     avg: 73.6     median: 73.2 (20%)     max: 74.5 Points
38.9 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.72     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.79 Points
2.7 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.36     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1003     avg: 1114     median: 1114 (7%)     max: 1225 Points
2159 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1876     avg: 3116     median: 3116 (2%)     max: 4356 Points
6432 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
2458 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
1311 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.5 s (5%)
17.6 s (4%)
24.7 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
661 s (8%)
86%
1 Z8750 +
772 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z8750 +
807 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5832     avg: 6817     median: 7184 (4%)     max: 7436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2145     avg: 2279     median: 2279 (27%)     max: 2412 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z8700 +
10.3 fps (0%)
97%
1 Z8750 +
10 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z8700 +
50.8 fps (1%)
94%
1 Z8750 +
48 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.38 fps
44%
1 Z8750 +
0.6 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
77%
1 Z8750 +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (4%)
83%
1 Z8750 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
53%
1 Z8750 +
1 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2558     avg: 2571     median: 2570.5 (18%)     max: 2583 Seconds
52%
1 Z8750 +
4929 Seconds (35%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.642     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (36%)     max: 1.649 sec
60%
1 Z8750 +
2.7 sec (59%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3403 Points (7%)
71%
1 Z8750 +
2426 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
49.8 s (11%)
25.6 s (6%)
36.4 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
96.7 s (4%)
58.8 s (3%)
80.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z8750 +
1734 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 493     avg: 1186     median: 1186 (3%)     max: 1879 Points
min: 2626     avg: 2669     median: 2668.5 (7%)     max: 2711 Points
1499 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
2570 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8750 +
19651 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
237 Points (1%)
min: 2251     avg: 2348     median: 2373 (6%)     max: 2421 Points
1664 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3496     avg: 3723     median: 3688 (7%)     max: 3984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 909     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (4%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
320 Points (7%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1068 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 Z8750 +
192 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8750 +
383 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 438     avg: 442     median: 439 (15%)     max: 449 Points
53%
1 Z8750 +
233 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1505     avg: 1525     median: 1509 (3%)     max: 1561 Points
51%
1 Z8750 +
770 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 435     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (2%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1492     avg: 1503     median: 1503 (5%)     max: 1514 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1864     avg: 1885     median: 1876 (19%)     max: 1915 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5477     avg: 5606     median: 5668 (6%)     max: 5674 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
970 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3350 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
990 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z8700 +
2675 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z8700 +
2440 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z8700 +
3867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z8700 +
3767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
3427 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4370 ms (5%)
min: 2125     avg: 2308     median: 2345.5 (3%)     max: 2415 ms
4386 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8700 +
348.7 ms (4%)
520 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
8408 Points (6%)
min: 16865     avg: 17701     median: 17701 (12%)     max: 18537 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 85     avg: 90.9     median: 86.2 (15%)     max: 106 Points
56%
1 Z8750 +
48.1 Points (9%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 Z8750 +
3482 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 Z8750 +
19372 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 Z8750 +
21698 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 Z8750 +
43532 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 Z8750 +
88084 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 3.0 Battery Life
383 min (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28061 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8969 Points (31%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.3 Watt (2%)
84%
1 Z8750 +
9.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 Z8750 +
6.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)
48%
1 Z8750 +
13.6 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8700 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → 287% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8750 → 188% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 28. 10:53:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6670 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11533 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9070 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766915601s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Dec 2025 05:18:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.015s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6670 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 6670 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11533 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 11533 +0.007s ... 0.032s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9070 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 9070 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.082s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.082s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)