Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20 vs ARM Mali-G77 MP11

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G71 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP20

The ARM Mali-G71 MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was e.g. used in smartphone chip Samsung Exynos 9 8895. It features 20 clusters and is manufactured in 10nm FinFET (in the Exynos 8895). The performance is in the high-end class and therefore all current Android games should run fluently on the chip.

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G77 MP11

The ARM Mali-G77MP11 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Samsung Exynos 990 (e.g. Galaxy S20 series). It integrates 11 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G71 MP20ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesnono
technology4 nm16 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 29.03.2017 19.03.2020
CodenameMimirValhall
ArchitectureBifrostValhall
Pipelines8 - unified11 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 4162     avg: 4222     median: 4221.5 (2%)     max: 4281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
1391 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 33077     avg: 35410     median: 36347 (4%)     max: 36807 Points
min: 48476     avg: 74951     median: 82052.5 (8%)     max: 87223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 3222     avg: 3555     median: 3426 (15%)     max: 4016 Points
min: 7385     avg: 7798     median: 7576 (33%)     max: 8485 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 3896     avg: 4314     median: 4137 (9%)     max: 4908 Points
min: 9470     avg: 10329     median: 9536 (21%)     max: 11868 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 2648     avg: 3058     median: 3261 (14%)     max: 3265 Points
min: 6638     avg: 7083     median: 7076 (30%)     max: 7459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 2723     avg: 3293     median: 3571 (9%)     max: 3584 Points
min: 870     avg: 7112     median: 8239 (21%)     max: 9190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3414     avg: 3796     median: 3958 (35%)     max: 4015 Points
min: 5646     avg: 6920     median: 7152 (64%)     max: 8097 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3928     avg: 4546     median: 4786 (29%)     max: 4923 Points
min: 6388     avg: 9004     median: 9480 (57%)     max: 11488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2584     avg: 2989     median: 3188 (16%)     max: 3194 Points
min: 6544     avg: 6733     median: 6732 (33%)     max: 6896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2661     avg: 3204     median: 3472 (12%)     max: 3479 Points
min: 8005     avg: 8260     median: 8257 (28%)     max: 8469 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 79.3     median: 79.5 (14%)     max: 89 fps
min: 20     avg: 21.8     median: 22 (4%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 43     avg: 53.4     median: 56 (4%)     max: 58 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
25 fps (2%)
min: 38     avg: 47.6     median: 50 (5%)     max: 51 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
min: 24     avg: 36     median: 42 (1%)     max: 42 fps
min: 65     avg: 77.4     median: 80 (2%)     max: 85 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
min: 50     avg: 54.3     median: 51 (2%)     max: 62 fps
min: 96     avg: 108.8     median: 108 (5%)     max: 126 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
min: 104     avg: 110     median: 105 (1%)     max: 121 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP11
min: 145     avg: 186.8     median: 199 (2%)     max: 200 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
222645 Points (22%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (45%)     max: 695509 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 41022     avg: 41847     median: 42183 (96%)     max: 42335 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 41901     avg: 43072     median: 43464 (97%)     max: 43852 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
71.6 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7552 Points (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2573 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 18% n=8

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP11 → 38% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
high
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
59%
Mali-G77 MP11:
40 40 60 ~ 47 fps
med.
Mali-G77 MP11:
40  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
68%
Mali-G77 MP11:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
26%
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
76%
Mali-G77 MP11:
87  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Mali-G77 MP11:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-G77 MP11:
60  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
60  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 26%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP11 → 68%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 63%

Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G71 MP20ARM Mali-G77 MP11
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile805940474040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6060
Dead Trigger 21143087
Asphalt 9: Legends6059
Real Racing 360
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G71 MP20ARM Mali-G77 MP11
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3

1


2
5


2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 06. 07:32:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7732 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10328 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762410758s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Nov 2025 05:21:25 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.017s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7732 +0s ... 0.023s

#12 got single benchmarks 7732 +0.005s ... 0.027s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10328 +0s ... 0.028s

#14 got single benchmarks 10328 +0.007s ... 0.034s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.052s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.052s

#18 Got 67 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.063s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.063s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.064s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.068s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.068s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)